Riot Of The Blood said:
I disagree completely. Final Destiniation is not a great for duels; it's quite the opposite. 1.That stage allows for coward tactics like projectiles spamming and running away the entire match. 2. Battlefield is better suited for duels, because it makes it so both fighters are forced to do just: duel! There's no running away. You have to fight in order to win.3. On that stage, the best fighter will be the winner. There are no places to run, no places to hide, and there's nothing on the stage that can kill you. 4.The fight is won by the fighter with the most skill. |
1. not true
Coward tactics work better in battle field because the attacker cannot jump on the projectile user because of the platforms.
2. not true
Battlefield is not better suited for duels because it has obstructions.
Ike for example is at an advantage because his sword goes through the platform hitting any opponent resting on the platform.
While pikachu has a disadvantage because his thunderbolt can't pass through the platform.
3.Not true
Those description fit more if paired with final destination.
"no places to run" "no places to hide" "nothing on the stage that can kill you"
The first two points is false because BattleField has platforms.
The only point battlefield has is the last one, but final destination is just as equally well with the last point.
4.More so in final destination.
Check number 2.
I would like to ask for other brawlers input.
What do you guys think?