Imaginedvl said:
sergiodaly said:
no question there @bold but can you wrap your head around the idea that there are other ways to grab our money? Sony and Nintendo, as platform holders, can negotiate with publishers some other way to bring more cash in their platform other than intrusive DRM... you can go check my post history, and see that i am pro DRM, because i work in a SW house and know creating SW is hard work, but DRM must be well implemented and work without the consumer ever notice he is there, unless they make something illegal (not illegal to be off-line, to lend a game or sell your disc game(by selling it you must revoke the right to play that game and the new owner must get a new user right permit to use that SW). And the lack of Laws in this matter is disturbing BTW...
|
Very glad you got the point of the thread. Many did not and just came in defense of Sony or argued about the patent itself instead :)
Now, we can still talk about DRM of course!
Regarding your point, I am not disgreeing at all. I think it would be hard to argue that no-DRM is better than DRM for the end user :)
My reality is that, on a personal stand point, it does not bother me that much; and at the same time I really find the fact that you need to connect to the internet once per 24 hours really not as drastic as some seem to believe. I have a lot of game on Steam and it is way more drastic than that... Same for downloadable games on console... I actually see this as an advantage (because you install the game and forget the disc)
Now, if the console makers let us sell back our game online on in-store (and it looks like we will be able to do so), then the only draw drawback is to be able to lend a game disc to a friend... But again, you cannot do that with digital games or most of the PC games today.
|
i don't know about all platforms... but in PS3... we can... when i buy a game in the PSN store, i can download and install in 2 PS3 systems (mine, obviously, and in a friend PS3 for example) as soon as my friend say he is done with the game i can go to my account settings and disable his system from my account *... he can even play the game (while active)in his profile and earn trophies**... this is DRM and still you can control your account and your content.
MS could do this "tie the disc game with your account" and you must be on-line only in the activation of the disc, after that, you could go off-line for days and months until next new game, witch would be less intrusive, but would require extra stuff in the BD drive and result in less security for the platform (my guess, no actual proof).
*(i believe steam has a similar system, PCs (HW) "tied" to one account, but the disable has to be done on-site, while on SEN is done remotely IIRC)
**(even play with me MP, witch is not possible with a lend disc)