| noname2200 said: Because you don't give Citizen Kane a motherfucking 7 dammit! |
Haha, thanks for the good laugh
| noname2200 said: Because you don't give Citizen Kane a motherfucking 7 dammit! |
Well Swedens biggest newspaper gave the last of us a 2/5...
If it isn't turnbased it isn't worth playing
(mostly)
And shepherds we shall be,
For Thee, my Lord, for Thee. Power hath descended forth from Thy hand, That our feet may swiftly carry out Thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to Thee And teeming with souls shall it ever be. In Nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritūs Sancti. -----The Boondock Saints
| aikohualda said: because they already played the game and think it is a 10... |
This hasn't been quoted enough!
Off-topic: I never really liked Citizen Kane, from all the classics I think that one is overrated.
| Naum said: Well Swedens biggest newspaper gave the last of us a 2/5... |
Haha, what? Which paper is that? I need to read that review! 
Aftonbladet?
| Mummelmann said: The only thing more baffling than people getting upset over review scores is people who are furious and upset about people being upset about reviews scores. Nothing new under the sun. |
I totally disagree. I mean the first batch of people basically say YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE YOUR OWN OPINION (you cant rate it 7!!!!!!) the other group say WHY DO YOU WHINE ABOUT PEOPLE HAVING ANOTHER OPINION?
Saying that the later group existing baffles you more than the first is quite sad tbh.

JazzB1987 said:
|
Okay.
Rofl. It's just one mans opinion. 7.5 is still a decent score imo.
I can't wait to see what the interwebs will do once Quarter to Three's review goes up.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.


