While I agree that Wolfenstein in this day and age may not be the best game to make and market but....

Dont think we needed an Epic Mickey 2 or hell maybe evan a one

Hush. Smeags did.

sales and reception says he's in the minority. at least in terms of the sequel

Atleast Epic Mickey was an attempt for creating an unique experience. You have to give him credit for that and also for his past. We need another FPS which gives the genre a new twist cause the AAA-FPS are for the most part repetetive as hell nowadays. Battlefield 4 may have good graphics but the campaign is the same overreacting bum bum script blah blah 3rd WW  scenario. And the MP will get more cod like. Even more then BF 3. Killzone 4 does the same, better graphics but the same gameplay.

he developed my favorite game of all time. For that I love him, or atleast the him of 13 years ago.

The two existing wolfenstein games were atleast awesome for their time imo.

But jesus christ, he's full of crap these days. There was some stupid quote he made about ultraviolence which is just dumb, when he's made some of the most violent games for their time in the past.

 I'd defend him, if I thought he was capable of developing a good game any more, but haha.

No, we don't need another generically dark, monochromatic, FPS, kill-the-Nazi-giant-robot game. I fully agree.

@Epic Mickey. The world needed an Epic Mickey and a GOOD Epic Mickey 2 that could correct the faults of the original.

No, no i dont. There was nothing unique about it, it played just like half a dozen 3d platformers i played years ago during the PS1/n64 era, wonky camer and all, and a paint mechanic that im sure was done better in Okami. The sequel was more of the same with a better camera and terrible partner AI attached. And LOL at your KZ4 critique, so you must have played the game? Please

Hater :P I'll pick this one up and enjoy the shit out of it. Like with the other Wolfenstein games.

Oh yeah?!

Oh... yeah.

(Sorry, Smeags.)