I wouldn't waste my time on him. He has also claimed there is no evidence that planes were involved in pentagon attacks in 9-11 and ignores even truther sites that admit it was a plane that hit the pentagon with tons of photos. He also claims there is no pictures of charred remains at the site because he refuses to do research (quick google search) of the photos released during the terrorists trial

The thing I don't get about Religion haters is that often they try and minimize the life of Christ. Jesus Christ was remarkable. He promoted peace, love, foregiveness, selflessness, and hated the way religious laws were being abused. He also hated the combiniton of business and the Church when he stormed the money changers in the temple. He also told Christians not to wage war the way that the world does.  Jesus Christ is everything people seem to respect these days.

Don't hate Jesus.. hate the Christians who are giving him a bad name.

What? How did Roman become Jew? Try and keep up here at least.

I said none of the Romans doubted the existence of their Gods. That doesn't make their Gods credible (obviously).

The rest is just suppositive and assumptive. 

You're welcome to your opinion, but you've failed to provide 1 piece of contemporary evidence. Speaks volumes really to any logical individual.

oh wow, really?  That explains a lot lol

I'm trying to understand your logic.  The question is rhetorical.  

I'm Chinese, so no, not even remotely close. The missionaries did good work spreading the religion though, I think the credit should go to those guys.

HAHAHAHA, wow, I really thought you had me there, but his is what you said

"Back in Roman times no one disagreed that Zeus existed. Your argument is stupid."

where in that sentence does it say "romans believed that zeus existed" it doesn't, you said "roman times" meaning that everyone during that time period belived that Zeus existed.  

haha, anyways, I never ever said I would try and provide contemporary evidence, you assumed that was what I was doing.

I completely agree that there is no contemporary evidence, but what I don't agree with is that there "should" be, or that the evidence that their is, DOESNT prove the existence of Jesus.

Remember, Jesus was a carpenter, how many ordinary carpenters were recorded in history?  The only time period that anythign would have been recorded was during his 3 year ministry, now tell me, do the research, find out "who" should have recorded anything, and if you do this, then we can continue.

Sure?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifty_Bibles_of_Constantine

L2research. 

The entire moral workings are known to share similarities with Plato's transendental ideas. "At face value" means fuck all considering how warped Christianity has become (Council of Nicea). 

The most influencial? Maybe. Most famous person in history? Without a doubt.

I think it depends on the person how much influence Jezus hade on their lives. For me a lot of people have made a bigger impact on my life: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Shigeru Miyamoto, Michael Schumacher and even people like Adolf Hitler have influenced me much more than Jezus, being in a good or bad way.

But if we really looking at a person's personal life, their parents, brothers, sisters or partners will probably have hade a bigger influence.

Ah. Well say what you mean then if you wish to accomplish something specific. In this case, yes I would expect contemporary evidence as the means to justify this particular claim. Certainly not all claims can be confined as such, but this one requires witnesses and such. None of these witnesses wrote of the event. That I find to be quite amazing. 

What does Roman times mean to you in regards to theism? ROMAN GODS. I don't care to debate semantics.

I didn't assume anything. I simply challenged you to do so, which you failed to do. No contemporary evidence, no proof. Simple. Issuing a challenge after you've lost a debate is pure lunacy. I think we have completed this discussion.