By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Lego City: Undercover, next gen graphics?

 

Are these next gen graphics?

Yes 60 23.26%
 
Barely 50 19.38%
 
Equal to 7 generation 73 28.29%
 
No 75 29.07%
 
Total:258
ninjablade on 18 March 2013
MDMAlliance said:
ninjablade said:
snowdog said:
ninjablade said:

you guys do realize the game is sub HD, draw distance is bad and so is frame rate, the only thing impressive is motion blur but i guess looking through rose tinted glasses make even a ok looking current gen game look next gen. i'm saying this based on the 43% that say its nextgen and barley, so the reality is its all bias, people way over exaggerate, a game's graphics just to feel good about the console they love.



Sub-HD..? Got any sauce with that..? I assumed it was 720p native..?

And you might want to have a look at the draw distance again and see an optician if you don't think the draw distance is impressive.

you have a neogaf account, it's been confirmed to be sub-hd on neogaf, look at page 12.


http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=50344158&postcount=551 You mean this?  (I didn't read the entire thread btw)

To me, this seems entirely baseless and by no means is a confirmation.

edit: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=50448360&postcount=607  We can argue that this post confirms it's native 720p if we look into it the way you looked into that neogaf post that was hypothetical.

noffi is a huge nintendo fan and if he thinks its sub hd, its probably is, we will find out soon enough probably tomorrow, and has for your draw distance comment, how is it impressive if its not consistent.



Around the Network
cbarroso09 on 18 March 2013
ninjablade said:
MDMAlliance said:
ninjablade said:
snowdog said:
ninjablade said:

you guys do realize the game is sub HD, draw distance is bad and so is frame rate, the only thing impressive is motion blur but i guess looking through rose tinted glasses make even a ok looking current gen game look next gen. i'm saying this based on the 43% that say its nextgen and barley, so the reality is its all bias, people way over exaggerate, a game's graphics just to feel good about the console they love.



Sub-HD..? Got any sauce with that..? I assumed it was 720p native..?

And you might want to have a look at the draw distance again and see an optician if you don't think the draw distance is impressive.

you have a neogaf account, it's been confirmed to be sub-hd on neogaf, look at page 12.


http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=50344158&postcount=551 You mean this?  (I didn't read the entire thread btw)

To me, this seems entirely baseless and by no means is a confirmation.

edit: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=50448360&postcount=607  We can argue that this post confirms it's native 720p if we look into it the way you looked into that neogaf post that was hypothetical.

noffi is a huge nintendo fan and if he thinks its sub hd, its probably is, we will find out soon enough probably tomorrow, and has for your draw distance comment, how is it impressive if its not consistent.

do you realize you can't use person opinions to validate an statement. 



ninjablade on 18 March 2013
cbarroso09 said:
ninjablade said:
MDMAlliance said:
ninjablade said:
snowdog said:
ninjablade said:

you guys do realize the game is sub HD, draw distance is bad and so is frame rate, the only thing impressive is motion blur but i guess looking through rose tinted glasses make even a ok looking current gen game look next gen. i'm saying this based on the 43% that say its nextgen and barley, so the reality is its all bias, people way over exaggerate, a game's graphics just to feel good about the console they love.



Sub-HD..? Got any sauce with that..? I assumed it was 720p native..?

And you might want to have a look at the draw distance again and see an optician if you don't think the draw distance is impressive.

you have a neogaf account, it's been confirmed to be sub-hd on neogaf, look at page 12.


http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=50344158&postcount=551 You mean this?  (I didn't read the entire thread btw)

To me, this seems entirely baseless and by no means is a confirmation.

edit: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=50448360&postcount=607  We can argue that this post confirms it's native 720p if we look into it the way you looked into that neogaf post that was hypothetical.

noffi is a huge nintendo fan and if he thinks its sub hd, its probably is, we will find out soon enough probably tomorrow, and has for your draw distance comment, how is it impressive if its not consistent.

do you realize you can't use person opinions to validate an statement. 

well i didn't validate, i thought it was confirmed, its not, i'm just saying it probably is and we will find out soon enough. 



MDMAlliance on 18 March 2013
ninjablade said:
MDMAlliance said:


http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=50344158&postcount=551 You mean this?  (I didn't read the entire thread btw)

To me, this seems entirely baseless and by no means is a confirmation.

edit: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=50448360&postcount=607  We can argue that this post confirms it's native 720p if we look into it the way you looked into that neogaf post that was hypothetical.

noffi is a huge nintendo fan and if he thinks its sub hd, its probably is, we will find out soon enough probably tomorrow, and has for your draw distance comment, how is it impressive if its not consistent.

What?  I never said the word "impressive."   I made no comments about it myself.  I was just defending what other people were saying about it.



famousringo on 18 March 2013
snowdog said:
The draw distance, lighting, pixel perfect shadows and depth of field are beyond anything that the PS3 and 360 GPUs are capable of, therefore it is a 'next gen' game.


Wrong.

It's developed for a console that came out in 2012, not a console that came out in 2006, therefore it is a 'next gen' game.



"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event."  — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.

Around the Network
Chark on 18 March 2013

It has some nice stuff thanks to the more modern hardware. Just looking at the water and draw distance but it isn't anything out of the realm of what PS3 and 360 have been offering. Close up this title doesn't have much next gen about it at all. This looks good for a lego game, but to be honest I don't think anyone should expect much from this dev. The backgrounds and added visual effects really are odd to see in a lego title and I guess the fact they are there really show that it is on a next gen console because otherwise they wouldn't have bothered I think.

In the end, not a graphic heavy title. The 22GB isn't hard to reach. Wii U titles don't need to be compressed as heavily now that they are on larger a disc format. The big hitters on PS3 or 360 uncompressed would take up a ton of space and there are plenty of titles that use that much space now like Infamous 2.



Before the PS3 everyone was nice to me :(

ninjablade on 18 March 2013
cbarroso09 said:
ninjablade said:
MDMAlliance said:
ninjablade said:
snowdog said:
ninjablade said:

you guys do realize the game is sub HD, draw distance is bad and so is frame rate, the only thing impressive is motion blur but i guess looking through rose tinted glasses make even a ok looking current gen game look next gen. i'm saying this based on the 43% that say its nextgen and barley, so the reality is its all bias, people way over exaggerate, a game's graphics just to feel good about the console they love.



Sub-HD..? Got any sauce with that..? I assumed it was 720p native..?

And you might want to have a look at the draw distance again and see an optician if you don't think the draw distance is impressive.

you have a neogaf account, it's been confirmed to be sub-hd on neogaf, look at page 12.


http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=50344158&postcount=551 You mean this?  (I didn't read the entire thread btw)

To me, this seems entirely baseless and by no means is a confirmation.

edit: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=50448360&postcount=607  We can argue that this post confirms it's native 720p if we look into it the way you looked into that neogaf post that was hypothetical.

noffi is a huge nintendo fan and if he thinks its sub hd, its probably is, we will find out soon enough probably tomorrow, and has for your draw distance comment, how is it impressive if its not consistent.

do you realize you can't use person opinions to validate an statement. 

more impressions neogaf claiming its sub hd http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=50645976&postcount=1509, i would say the game is sub hd 99% confirmed, since i habe never seen neogaf be wrong about this.