By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Galaxy S IV!

NYCrysis said:
michael_stutzer said:
NYCrysis said:

Sense 5 it a totally different beast vs sense 4. It's way faster cleaner looking and less resource hogging. I use it on my droid dna and it rocks! Also sense has a better ui than touchwiz. Also samsung is becoming like apple and i am done with supporting them. Gone from an s3 to a dna and I ain't looking back. The xperia z looks like an amazing phone + its waterproof capabilities are amazing. It has a great camera and I love that sony factory installs screen protectors on their devices (so no dust or airbuubles get underneath). An s4 pro proc. is more than enough for mobile web browsing, looking at mail, watching movies, playing potty games, or listening to music. I don't get the whole ordeal of superpowerful smartphones. There is no use for it atm.


The new Sense definitely looks nice and looks closer to stock than touchwiz. Pretty much only thing I am hesitant about One is the lack of SD card slot and removable battery. They were so close to perfection but screwed up again in those areas. At least give me my SD card slot. Xperia Z has SD card slot but the screen is nowhere near One. Decisions, decisions.

One thing I do a lot on my dna is use an otg cable to either connect my fiio e17 amp with it to listen to music (beats audio sucks, and s4 processor has a terrible built in dac), and connect my 64gb usb drive to it. It's amazing what I can do with android. Hell I can connect someone else's android and transfer files as well with that.

Yeah, I have an Ipad 4 and a 3 year old Galaxy S. Ipad just seems dumb compared to the phone. 



Around the Network
michael_stutzer said:
MoHasanie said:
michael_stutzer said:


The new Sense definitely looks nice and looks closer to stock than touchwiz. Pretty much only thing I am hesitant about One is the lack of SD card slot and removable battery. They were so close to perfection but screwed up again in those areas. At least give me my SD card slot. Xperia Z has SD card slot but the screen is nowhere near One. Decisions, decisions.


Just go for the S4 or Xperia Z. They both seem like great phones, and both will probably sell better than the HTC One. I'd also recomend the Lumia 920 cause that phone is excellent, and the OS is more appealing IMO although its a bit heavy compared to the S4 and Xperia. 

S4 is out of question for me. The reason is, I had a Galaxy S (and I actually still use it) I dropped it a lot (like once everyday) but it is still perfectly functional. I sometimes just throw it around in the house for fun. Two of my friends asked me for a durable phone because they drop their phones a lot like me and I recommended S3 to both.  Within one month, the screens of both phones cracked and one of them had a case on. I don't trust Samsung anymore. What is the purpose of plastic if the phone is not really durable? Functionality wise it is the best phone though.

Windows phone is out of question. I like it but I'd never use it as my daily driver. Great for a lot of people though, I am considering a Lumia 620 for my mother as a gift.


Yeah, I heard that too, that the S3 breaks very easily, and the S4 will probably too since its made from the same materials.

If you want a durable phone, then I think the Xperia is pretty good. 

Are you sure you don't like Windows phone? It looks really good, except many people complain about the few apps, so its understandable if that's your reason for not getting it. But in terms of durabilty, the Lumia 920 is fantastic. The guy at the store was showing me how strong it is and I was very impressed.  Check this link out to see how strong it is:

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Nokia-Lumia-920-torture-series-continues-what-will-break-it_id36885



    

NNID: FrequentFlyer54

michael_stutzer said:
disolitude said:
Regardless though... Here is an article which kind of explains what I am on about with my posts here.

http://www.engadget.com/2013/03/15/samsung-htc-design-marketing-battle/


Yeah, HTC is absolutely the better choice. I mean, It is just as big as s4 even though its screen is 0.3 inch less, it doesn't feature an SD card slot, doesn't have removable battery, the battery is smaller etc. But who cares, HTC has the looks so that is  automatically better option.

Sure if those things matter and you are willing to use a chep and plasticky feeling phone that is more likely to break when you drop it, you may have a point. I can show you what happened to my Samsung Focus S (Same phone as Galaxy S2) after a drop out of my pocket. My Lumia 920 has been dropped 10 times worse and its stll fine.  

Some of the things you mention would be cool like a bigger removable battery, however no matter what the battery life is (unless its droid RAzr Maxx) you're looking at daily recharges. 

SD card? Between my Skydrive, Dropbox and Box accounts I have 150 Gigs of online storage and phone comes with another 32 or 64 GB. With all of the Wifi networks around and unlimited data plans becoming more popular, I am not sure Is see any value in this. 

We're not even discussing how these devices feel in hand as I've not used wither. But HTC One X felt much nicer than S3 and I don't see how this will change.



MoHasanie said:
michael_stutzer said:
MoHasanie said:
michael_stutzer said:


The new Sense definitely looks nice and looks closer to stock than touchwiz. Pretty much only thing I am hesitant about One is the lack of SD card slot and removable battery. They were so close to perfection but screwed up again in those areas. At least give me my SD card slot. Xperia Z has SD card slot but the screen is nowhere near One. Decisions, decisions.


Just go for the S4 or Xperia Z. They both seem like great phones, and both will probably sell better than the HTC One. I'd also recomend the Lumia 920 cause that phone is excellent, and the OS is more appealing IMO although its a bit heavy compared to the S4 and Xperia. 

S4 is out of question for me. The reason is, I had a Galaxy S (and I actually still use it) I dropped it a lot (like once everyday) but it is still perfectly functional. I sometimes just throw it around in the house for fun. Two of my friends asked me for a durable phone because they drop their phones a lot like me and I recommended S3 to both.  Within one month, the screens of both phones cracked and one of them had a case on. I don't trust Samsung anymore. What is the purpose of plastic if the phone is not really durable? Functionality wise it is the best phone though.

Windows phone is out of question. I like it but I'd never use it as my daily driver. Great for a lot of people though, I am considering a Lumia 620 for my mother as a gift.


Yeah, I heard that too, that the S3 breaks very easily, and the S4 will probably too since its made from the same materials.

If you want a durable phone, then I think the Xperia is pretty good. 

 

Are you sure you don't like Windows phone? It looks really good, except many people complain about the few apps, so its understandable if that's your reason for not getting it. But in terms of durabilty, the Lumia 920 is fantastic. The guy at the store was showing me how strong it is and I was very impressed.  Check this link out to see how strong it is:

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Nokia-Lumia-920-torture-series-continues-what-will-break-it_id36885

 


I really wanted an htx 8x but my issues were with the windows phone os. I like the widget style of android better vs the tiles of windows phone. While windows 8 is my fav. tablet os, on the phone side I just don't like it. Also I have a lot invested into my google account and I just like google services better.



disolitude said:

Sure if those things matter and you are willing to use a chep and plasticky feeling phone that is more likely to break when you drop it, you may have a point. I can show you what happened to my Samsung Focus S (Same phone as Galaxy S2) after a drop out of my pocket. My Lumia 920 has been dropped 10 times worse and its stll fine.  

Some of the things you mention would be cool like a bigger removable battery, however no matter what the battery life is (unless its droid RAzr Maxx) you're looking at daily recharges. 

SD card? Between my Skydrive, Dropbox and Box accounts I have 150 Gigs of online storage and phone comes with another 32 or 64 GB. With all of the Wifi networks around and unlimited data plans becoming more popular, I am not sure Is see any value in this. 

We're not even discussing how these devices feel in hand as I've not used wither. But HTC One X felt much nicer than S3 and I don't see how this will change.

One will feel better in hand and look cool, no contest about that. 

Galaxy s2 and Galaxy S were extremely durable phones. This is the first time I hear something like that for a s2 variant. You were just unlucky. S3 on the other hand is terrible. It is not the materials used, there was something wrong with the S3 design. They may have fixed it this time. 920 is godly in this area, but I'd expect nothing less since it is like 2 S4 duct taped together. Noika may manufacture another phone with the remaining materials.

SD card is very important for me. 32 and 64 GB phones are ripoffs. I always get the lowest storage possible and just insert an SD card. Much more storage at cheaper prices. I don't care about streaming, it is bad for the battery, it consumes a lot of data, doesn't work everywhere( like in a plane) etc.

One may be a better option for some, but don't act like s4 has nothing compared to it. It is so wrong.



Around the Network
NYCrysis said:
VXIII said:
disolitude said:
VXIII said:

I understand why you don't like Samsung phones, I'm not a big fan either, but that completely false. A tech guy like you, you should have known better.

No it isn't false. How is it false?

Snapdragon 600 in HTC One is 40% faster than Sanpdragon S4 Pro in Galaxy S4

Camera on HTC One is being praised as the best cell phone camera on the market right now (other than Pureview 808) with amazing low light performance. This has to do with the face HTC isn't just throwing Megapixels at the sensor but is making them larger so they can take in more detail and light. Low light performance on HTC One is amazing.

Software is another no contest. Have you every used TouchWiz on Samsung phones? It just sucks. Sense on HTC Phones sucks less and is closer to Androids true flavour... All these bullshit features samsung gets people to line up for are nothing but gimmicks. I know quite a few people that use the S3 and they all tell me that first thing they do is disable them because they drain the battery much faster and are essentially useless. 

 

There are two versions of the S4, one comes with Octa core processor, the other come with a Snapdragon that is clocked at higher speed than the HTC One S600, and don't forget the DDR3 ram.

HTC one Ultrapexle camera samples are already all over the internet, nothing is so grounbreaking about them really , it does take a great low light pics like Nokia's phone , but that's just about it.

Software part, I have to respectfully disagree. Sense is just terrible ( haven't tried 5 yet ) and tries too hard to be different for the sake of it, it is very heavy and causes the phone to lag alot. TouchWiz on the other hand is well optimized and features packed UI , I adore the " gimmicks " that it has to offer, looks terrible though :)

 


Sense 5 it a totally different beast vs sense 4. It's way faster cleaner looking and less resource hogging. I use it on my droid dna and it rocks! Also sense has a better ui than touchwiz. Also samsung is becoming like apple and i am done with supporting them. Gone from an s3 to a dna and I ain't looking back.

The xperia z looks like an amazing phone + its waterproof capabilities are amazing. It has a great camera and I love that sony factory installs screen protectors on their devices (so no dust or airbuubles get underneath).

An s4 pro proc. is more than enough for mobile web browsing, looking at mail, watching movies, playing potty games, or listening to music. I don't get the whole ordeal of superpowerful smartphones. There is no use for it atm.

The one imo is a better phone than the s4. It's a cleaner looking device, has better speakers/camera, a 4.7 inch full rgb s-lcd 3 display (Gorgeous with my dna), has a solid feel to it, imo sense is cleaner looking imo.


Sounds really tempting. HTC keeps evolving, one has to respect that.

Man, I'm gonna try so hard not to upgrade this year, my phone is only 3 months old xD

 

 

 

 

 

 



MoHasanie said:

Yeah, I heard that too, that the S3 breaks very easily, and the S4 will probably too since its made from the same materials.

If you want a durable phone, then I think the Xperia is pretty good. 

 

Are you sure you don't like Windows phone? It looks really good, except many people complain about the few apps, so its understandable if that's your reason for not getting it. But in terms of durabilty, the Lumia 920 is fantastic. The guy at the store was showing me how strong it is and I was very impressed.  Check this link out to see how strong it is:

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Nokia-Lumia-920-torture-series-continues-what-will-break-it_id36885

It is indeed very strong, Nokia phones are always durable. One of the main reasons why reason I won't consider WP is the hardware still, the design of 920 is terrible to my eyes, too heavy, too thick etc. 8X is better in this area, nothing great, but good. It doesn't have any features to win me over still. The screen is a little small for me too. Windows Phone is just not for me, I mean it was out for 3 years and it still doesn't have a proper way to handle notifications I receive 100 notifications in a day minimum. Lots of small details like this but I guess we are a little off topic here.



michael_stutzer said:
disolitude said:

Sure if those things matter and you are willing to use a chep and plasticky feeling phone that is more likely to break when you drop it, you may have a point. I can show you what happened to my Samsung Focus S (Same phone as Galaxy S2) after a drop out of my pocket. My Lumia 920 has been dropped 10 times worse and its stll fine.  

Some of the things you mention would be cool like a bigger removable battery, however no matter what the battery life is (unless its droid RAzr Maxx) you're looking at daily recharges. 

SD card? Between my Skydrive, Dropbox and Box accounts I have 150 Gigs of online storage and phone comes with another 32 or 64 GB. With all of the Wifi networks around and unlimited data plans becoming more popular, I am not sure Is see any value in this. 

We're not even discussing how these devices feel in hand as I've not used wither. But HTC One X felt much nicer than S3 and I don't see how this will change.

One will feel better in hand and look cool, no contest about that. 

Galaxy s2 and Galaxy S were extremely durable phones. This is the first time I hear something like that for a s2 variant. You were just unlucky. S3 on the other hand is terrible. It is not the materials used, there was something wrong with the S3 design. They may have fixed it this time. 920 is godly in this area, but I'd expect nothing less since it is like 2 S4 duct taped together. Noika may manufacture another phone with the remaining materials.

SD card is very important for me. 32 and 64 GB phones are ripoffs. I always get the lowest storage possible and just insert an SD card. Much more storage at cheaper prices. I don't care about streaming, it is bad for the battery, it consumes a lot of data, doesn't work everywhere( like in a plane) etc.

One may be a better option for some, but don't act like s4 has nothing compared to it. It is so wrong.


Point taken. I think I am over-compensating for the fact that Galaxy S4 will get 10X+ the sales of HTC One while arguable being a worse phone.

Apparently its been revealed that the screen on the Samsung S4 is still pentile. While it doesn't make a big difference at that kind of PPi, its still dissapointing when you consider that the competition isn't using pentire arangements for their screens. Its esentially samsing cheating and giving users 1/2 the "true PPI" at 1080p.

Finally I must have been unlucky with the Samsung focus S which really cracked on me after an innocent fall of 3 feet maybe.




Baalzamon said:
theARTIST0017 said:

Now, your picture is a bit misleading. I'm sure the S4 is slightly bigger than the S3 than what it shows and also lighter.

 

Picture isn't misleading at all. The S4 is actually a marginally smaller phone than the S3, despite its screen size increasing.


Thats a misleading comment because if you told me or most people that the S4 is smaller then the S3 the first thing they'll think of is screen size. So in this case it would be strange to say smaller since if you were to put an S3 on top of the S4, the S4 would appear larger.

However, the S4 is thinner and  lighter so the only way you could say its smaller is if you're comparing how thin 



NINTENDO

nintendo forever . . .

It's awesome iam geting one. Steve jobs just rolled over in his grave again lol



VITA 32 GIG CARD.250 GIG SLIM & 160 GIG PHAT PS3