Galaxy S IV!

[disolitude]

michael_stutzer said:

disolitude said:
Regardless though... Here is an article which kind of explains what I am on about with my posts here.

http://www.engadget.com/2013/03/15/samsung-htc-design-marketing-battle/

Yeah, HTC is absolutely the better choice. I mean, It is just as big as s4 even though its screen is 0.3 inch less, it doesn't feature an SD card slot, doesn't have removable battery, the battery is smaller etc. But who cares, HTC has the looks so that is  automatically better option.

Sure if those things matter and you are willing to use a chep and plasticky feeling phone that is more likely to break when you drop it, you may have a point. I can show you what happened to my Samsung Focus S (Same phone as Galaxy S2) after a drop out of my pocket. My Lumia 920 has been dropped 10 times worse and its stll fine.  

Some of the things you mention would be cool like a bigger removable battery, however no matter what the battery life is (unless its droid RAzr Maxx) you're looking at daily recharges. 

SD card? Between my Skydrive, Dropbox and Box accounts I have 150 Gigs of online storage and phone comes with another 32 or 64 GB. With all of the Wifi networks around and unlimited data plans becoming more popular, I am not sure Is see any value in this. 

We're not even discussing how these devices feel in hand as I've not used wither. But HTC One X felt much nicer than S3 and I don't see how this will change.