Care to elaborate on the reasoning why?

Sure. It's such unbelievably bad logic.(as is the suspicion about spurge) It's the type of opinion newbs tend to have, where behavior outside of this Round of Mafia would influence what role they get. It's uncoachable.

Just watch. Nothing suits town better than deductive reasoning. I think he's already displayed his capabilities this far, and I'm pretty certain that makes you a tad nervous as scum.

So in this delusional world of yours, nen is my scumbuddy or a townie?

I'm not sure yet but I'm pretty positive you and Seth are in the same team.

Well I'm pretty positive that's the case too. See we can agree!

:) That's awesome. I just think you're both in a scumteam though.

Here's a possible scenario:

My read on nen is good, he was not able to present a very solid case against it and now you are trying to deflect from it.

I didn't really think it was very likely until this post, but why go to the step of calling someones theory something out of a 'delusional world'. This is suspicious to me, it's the same kind of trying to appeal to ones own superiority that really raised the red flag on nen-suer for me.

Bong, that was directed at happy. Since before you, nen was the only one I mentioned being suspicious of. So if I believe you are a threat due to your deductive skills, it would suggest I don't want you going after nen. Further, that would mean I was bussing my scummate, which is not beyond me, yet totally completely unneeded when the FF train could be the spotlight. Ahhh, but what if FF is scum too you say? Well then sacrificing him serves the same purpose as bussing nen.

While Nacho was first to mention coaching: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5194404 Bong takes it to quite another level here. It's one thing to understand that scum could help a newb with a good reply for a question, it's another to jump to the conclusion that the scumteam would instruct the newb to play up the newb card.