Hus didn't make a second account. I'm a different person, retard.

Yes, and you are as of now reported.

Yeah, whatever, go on and report me. Once the IP is all checked out, they'll know you're wrong.

make that two...

This is the breakdown we're likely to see from most developers. Anybody hoping for the AAA third party titles on Wii is going to be hoping for a long time. Nintendo will get games that are cheap to make (last gen ports, spinoffs, and, for lack of a better term, kiddy games). Anything online is likely to favor 360 because Microsoft's got a 5 year headstart. PS3 and 360 will be the choices for those looking for power, and the biggest games will be on one or both of those systems. EA is pretty similar to the remainder of the American developers. They are platform agnostic, but they do have their preferences as to what gets what. Similarly, Take Two sees the biggest opportunity in Wii for Fantastic 4 and last gen ports, while the big games like GTA will be on 360 and PS3. THQ, meanwhile, will heavily utilize Wii to leverage its Nickelodeon licenses.

And isn't it fantastic that rather than arguing solidly the name calling comes back again.

Oh the woe that is becoming vgchartz.

Kwaad summed it up pretty well, but I prefer to say 'everyone' rather than 'kiddy'.  It's the 'everyone'ness' that makes the game 'kiddy' to Hus and Kwaad because it has to be suitable for the kiddies as well as other people.

I believe the appropriate term is "family-oriented," which while it can extend beyond just kids doesn't necessarily mean everyone.