By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Killzone: Shadowfall will be 1080p/30FPS

KingofRome on 21 February 2013
dahuman said:
ethomaz said:

dahuman said:

You fail at reading so hard that I don't even know what to respond with right now, I don't even know how you came to that conclusion after reading that article, you don't understand it at all and you don't even want to.

Dude... I think you are crazy because it's impossible to undestand anything else from that article... you think you are right but you are not.

You need to learn a little more about the stuffs that you talk.


Thank you for proving my point in that you only see what you want to see and nothing else is registering.

You're wrong on so many levels, it's hilarious. 



Around the Network
Conegamer on 21 February 2013
Chevinator123 said:
Conegamer said:
Personally I'd rather 720 at 60, but whatever. Doubt this is an issue with the console but a design choice, a strange one though

Whaa =/ 720p is disgusting, you can still see pixels!!!

Well, you can't, but the fact is 30FPS is far worse for a shooter than 60FPS, in my opinion obviously.



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

dahuman on 21 February 2013
ethomaz said:

KingofRome said:

Maybe because he just "TL;DR".

Ain't nobody got time fo dat.

Go there and read everything and comeback here to say I'm wrong... it's easy.

If you guys wants I can even ask to the author of the article to confirm what I'm saying... I did that with the PS3 hack thing and I was right another time... when I was wrong I accept and just apologize.


What PS3 hack thing?

No amount of tweaking will make up for the lower performance if your skill level is at the higher performance part, it's all skill based, and it's something consoles don't have to worry about since they all perform the same! What made you think that tweaking your settings would make you be on equal footings? Seriously?



dahuman on 21 February 2013
KingofRome said:
dahuman said:
ethomaz said:

dahuman said:

You fail at reading so hard that I don't even know what to respond with right now, I don't even know how you came to that conclusion after reading that article, you don't understand it at all and you don't even want to.

Dude... I think you are crazy because it's impossible to undestand anything else from that article... you think you are right but you are not.

You need to learn a little more about the stuffs that you talk.


Thank you for proving my point in that you only see what you want to see and nothing else is registering.

You're wrong on so many levels, it's hilarious. 

Thanks for the constructive posting without reasoning? o_O;



KingofRome on 21 February 2013
Conegamer said:
Chevinator123 said:
Conegamer said:
Personally I'd rather 720 at 60, but whatever. Doubt this is an issue with the console but a design choice, a strange one though

Whaa =/ 720p is disgusting, you can still see pixels!!!

Well, you can't, but the fact is 30FPS is far worse for a shooter than 60FPS, in my opinion obviously.

BF3 online with 30 FPS (Dedicated servers) > CoD online with 60 FPS (One host).

As long as it has dedicated servers (which it will), I'll be happy for my multiplayer experience.



Around the Network
KingofRome on 21 February 2013
dahuman said:
KingofRome said:
dahuman said:
ethomaz said:

dahuman said:

You fail at reading so hard that I don't even know what to respond with right now, I don't even know how you came to that conclusion after reading that article, you don't understand it at all and you don't even want to.

Dude... I think you are crazy because it's impossible to undestand anything else from that article... you think you are right but you are not.

You need to learn a little more about the stuffs that you talk.


Thank you for proving my point in that you only see what you want to see and nothing else is registering.

You're wrong on so many levels, it's hilarious. 

Thanks for the constructive posting without reasoning? o_O;

I'm sorry I just wanted to join in and say you're wrong. I don't even know what I'm talking about, nor do I know what your ongoing argument with Ethomaz consists of. Carry on!



dahuman on 21 February 2013
KingofRome said:
dahuman said:
KingofRome said:
dahuman said:
ethomaz said:

dahuman said:

You fail at reading so hard that I don't even know what to respond with right now, I don't even know how you came to that conclusion after reading that article, you don't understand it at all and you don't even want to.

Dude... I think you are crazy because it's impossible to undestand anything else from that article... you think you are right but you are not.

You need to learn a little more about the stuffs that you talk.


Thank you for proving my point in that you only see what you want to see and nothing else is registering.

You're wrong on so many levels, it's hilarious. 

Thanks for the constructive posting without reasoning? o_O;

I'm sorry I just wanted to join in and say you're wrong. I don't even know what I'm talking about, nor do I know what your ongoing argument with Ethomaz consists of. Carry on!


Hahaha okie, gotcha.



9087 on 21 February 2013

Killzone Shadowfall is going to be awesome.

Cant wait to see more.



ethomaz on 21 February 2013

dahuman said:

What PS3 hack thing?

No amount of tweaking will make up for the lower performance if your skill level is at the higher performance part, it's all skilled based, and it's something consoles don't have to worry about since they all perform the same! What made you think that tweaking your settings would make you be on equal footings? Seriously?

I just give a example but the PS3 hack thing there is nothing to do with you.

What you said now I agree... if you are a more skilled gamer then you are better. What I'm saying a player running the game at fixed 80fps have no advantage over a player running at fixed 40fps if the game was coded right (like I explain before).

Now the calibraiton of the maouse is another thing... you can make you gameplay better with it and have some advantage over somebody that didn't do that (even so if the guy is more skilled he will play better anyway) but the fps didn't interfere in the mouse response.

The problem is not the low fps... what give you advantage in online play is the variable fps that some other play have with the weak hardware... so sometimes the guy have a biggest drop in the fps that cause the lag in the response to the server, the machine is having trouble to run the game so the reponse is delayed... you have advantage over these guys.

But over a guy with fixed 40fps for example... your 80fps fixed give you no advantage.



ethomaz on 21 February 2013
RolStoppable said:

ethomaz said:

(...)

The problem is not the low fps... what give you advantage in online play is the variable fps that some other play have with the weak hardware... so sometimes the guy have a biggest drop in the fps that cause the lag in the response to the server, the machine is having trouble to run the game so the reponse is delayed... you have advantage over these guys.

But over a gay with fixed 40fps for example... your 80fps fixed give you no advantage.

Can you show me any statistics to back up that homosexual gamers are better than heterosexual ones?

lol lol lol fixed.