Crytek is still King boys.

http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=da&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=fa&ie=UTF-8&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gamereactor.dk%2Fanmeldelser%2F151741%2FCrysis%2B3

"Forget about Microsoft and Sony's promise of next-generation graphics. It is this fact already, and we can thank Crytek for."

That link doesn't do SHIT!!

Are you high?

They can talk when they bring a new Crysis with an Open World with the CryEngine3 on PC aka a game that is destroying 3000$ PCs.
As long as they don't do that > DICE with Battlefield is the King of graphics.Cause they don't try to copy Call of "smaller maps than the litterbox of my cat" Duty.
They go all out on PC and show how much superior a PC Version can be.Unlike Crytek who is willing to destroy everything so the (PS)360 boys are happy and not sad the PC Version is superior.

This crap called Crysis 2 and Crysis 3 isn't worth the words.
They destroy all the hype they generated with Crysis 1 on PC in just a single Gen where they got money hungry.

Now if they could just make it a game worthwhile playing. "look at me, I has the best graphics but I'm forgettable as fuck." That's what this game screams to me.

Was there ever any doubt? I could tell from the demos theyve showed this game would be untouchable on PC.

Whether you like Crytek games or not they know how to seriously push hardware

Graphics king sure. But the rest?

Yay, shiny visuals and gimmicky gameplay (the nanosuit is ridiculous and useless, much like Plasmids in Bioshock and add very little to the game), the worst AI in gaming today, shallow, cliched plots and dialogue. Oh, and its not sandbox at all, they Crysis games just have very wide corridors and are quite linear.

Well done Crytek, you make the shiniest hollow husks of all.

looks horrible, i was more impressed with my run through off final fantasy ix then this.