One thing that bothers me when I see the argument "Have you ever seen a game on {platform A} that looks as good as {game x}" as their proof that one system is more powerful than another is that they always fail to take into consideration that the developers of the game they praise so heavily may have made trade-offs (that could be made in other games) that resulted in improved graphics.

Gran Turismo 5 is the latest in these games ... Now I'm not a racing game fan (I think I would rather watch grass grow than play a racing simulation) but I have heard that the Gran Turismo series has historically had worse Physics, AI, and a far less interactive environment (for example no traffic) and the only technical area where it is technically impressive is its graphics; at the same time there seems to be countless other racing games which are (somewhat) similar in graphics but are far more advanced in one (or more) other areas.

I actually found your comment sort of biased towards the 360 rocketpig.

I have both a 360 and a ps3, no it is not debateble, Uncharted looks SIGNIFICANTLY better than gears of war. Is Ratchet  not a platformer? GT5 prolauge is not a demo it is more of a prolauge as in it introduces you to the game. WHy do you think there is a demo out for it?

Of course, you're entitled to your own opinion.

I felt however that your comments in this thread weren't very constructive, and were a bit damning against Sony fans in general. Also lots of one line sentences and smiley faces didn't help...

'You are that sony fan that has to justify your 600$ purchase when the 360 does the same or better as of now'

'Its funny how some sony fanboys are'

'ROFL!!

Sony fanboys are always a good laugh.'

'right now 360>PS3'

etc.

 I'm not sure if I'd question his mental stability considering your post's in this thread xD

for me its pretty hard to say right now,which one will achive crysis level first will be the better one

Well, I don't consider GT5P a full game. That's my prerogative, whether it sounds childish to you or not. Personally, I think it's a load of crap that Sony is shoveling that game at $40 a pop down peoples' throats and they're taking it with a smile.

And I still don't consider R&C a platformer. Sorry, I just don't. While previous R&Cs definitely fit that description, Future Tools doesn't IMO. 

I think they're both beautiful games with great graphics and vastly different art styles. I don't see how that's biased toward anything.

 Well it is 40 cars, 16 man races isn't it? I'm not sure if that's actually much of a "dumbed down game" xD, but yeah I'm not sure if $40 should be the entry fee, maybe 30 :P

If Sony charged $20 for GT5P, I wouldn't have a problem. If they charged $40 and refunded $20 when you bought GT5, I wouldn't have a problem.

But $40 for a cut down game that you'll have to rebuy for $60 in a year? Ugh, no thanks. Screw you, Sony.

 That would be sweet :P but I sadly know many people willing to buy it xD, well GT5 is supposed to come with so much extra stuff it's attempting to be a completely different game :P, now if you could transfer your GT5 prologue data I'd even think about it :P