By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Wii U graphics power finally revealed - "we can now finally rule out any next-gen pretensions for the Wii U"

Kaizar said:
ninjablade said:
Kaizar said:
zero129 said:
ninjablade said:
curl-6 said:
ninjablade said:
curl-6 said:
ninjablade said:
curl-6 said:
ninjablade said:

we do have the specs for the most part http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/df-hardware-wii-u-graphics-power-finally-revealed

look under my sig those are all confirmed specs barring some kind of miracle.

The specs are incomplete, and some of them are assumptions rather than fact.


did you read the article, most of it is cold hard facts, at first some people said eurogamer rushed the article but its going on 2 days now and nobody corrected anything, even neogaf are accepting the 352 gflops numbers now here is quote i found intersting in the comment section.

 

Am I the only one being shocked by the fact that the Wii U CPU is basically the same type that I had in my 1998 PowerMac G3?! Am I correct here, it's basically a triple-core overclocked PowerPC 750?!! ROFLMAO! No wonder the poor ports and performance, the GPU on that thing is no powerhouse by any means but that ancient CPU architecture is choking it blue. A 3DFX Voodoo2 would have been a better match. They'd be better off if they'd stuck a current low-end, dual-core celeron in there instead but I guess they got a ridiculously good deal on tons of left-over GC/Wii CPU's laying around the manufacturers warehouse. Facepalm Nintendo, facepalm...

I read the article; there's plenty of unknown factors and guesstimates. And I'm not sure how a troll post helps your point?

i don't see how its a troll post it actaully makes sense, why they put such a weak cpu in the machine, anyway i believe DF, they have a amazing track record, no reason to doubt them and nobody has proved them wrong. 

"I guess they got a ridiculously good deal on tons of left-over GC/Wii CPU's laying around the manufacturers warehouse. Facepalm Nintendo, facepalm..." That's trolling. People who drop those kind of lines strike me as people who are not going to give an objective perspective on Nintendo hardware. Not to mention, it hasn't been proven that the Wii U CPU is a "triple core overclocked PowerPC 750", in fact it's most likely not. It might be based on it for backwards compatibility purposes, but newer chips are often "based" on older ones because they're a direct descendent, just with improvements that come over time like large/faster caches, more cores, etc.

Nobody has proven Digital Foundry's analysis right either. What will prove it one way or another are games that come out once developers get a handle on the system's innards.


seems to me like he's a nintendo fan thats updset about the cpu but anything negative is called trolling. as i 360 fan, DF  broke the first real news about ps4 being more powerful and i believed them, i will alway trust DF and beyond3d, some those guys on neogaf are using wishful thinking instead of hard facts, most of them thrakter, bigassian claimg 600 flops, while more reasonable members told them 300-350 gflops.

See you only like to believe the stuff that agrees with what you want to believe without taking other facts into account. This is all ill say on the subject to you as clearly you have no idea what your talking about when it comes to this..


Yep, both ninjablade & Chark are PS fanboys who deny everything that shows that Nintendo is doing even 1 good thing during the present.

its like Dealing with 2D fanboys, except at least the 2D fanboys admit that they have a 2D agenda.

But it's like both PS fanboys & 2D fanboys have nothing else better to do but spend all day attacking everything in opposition.

I own Playstation & Nintendo & Sega Systems.

But I can only afford 2 consoles & 2 handhelds at a time (during any one Generation) but luckily the Vita library made it so I could just save money for a 3DS XL instead of PS Vita, but then the 3D effect in the Newer 3DS games made me save money for something else instead of 3DS XL.

So I just got extra cash laying around outside of what I got plan for Wii U & PS4. And the 3D movies in theaters won't cut it, LOL.

i don't even own a a ps3, how can i be a sony fanboy, lol


Well, as long as you are not one of those 2D fanboys that wish that 3D would die from the industry then I'll stop talking smack, LOL.

but your Xbox only thing sounds like a American only philosophy that is use for a white supremacist mentality to brainwash into kids like shown in Nightline (with Ted whomever, that was shown earlier during the 21st century)

i'm going ps4 nextgen, it will the most powerful, and i'm happy they are not focusing on motion controls, which i hate.



Around the Network
zero129 said:
ninjablade said:
Aielyn said:
ninjablade said:

no they said they did there own anlaysis they got the gpu pic from neogaf but not there analysis.

OK, then, let's use the article, because even from the article, you're wrong.

"Chipworks' shot is still being analysed"

"The answer comes from a mixture of known and unknown variables."

"The obvious suspect would be the Wii U's 1.2GHz CPU, a tri-core piece of hardware re-architected from the Wii's Broadway chip" - NOT a tri-core version of Broadway, but hardware that was re-architected from Broadway.

"However, there still plenty of unknowns to factor in too"

"... and effectively we have something approaching a full spec"

Even DF don't make the claim that it's cold hard facts.

And the fact that they had to update the die photo image because they had only marked half of the shader units says to me that they didn't do the analysis themselves... at least, the author didn't. And all of the information in the article, except for that exceptional and unsubstantiated claim right at the end, is information available from that NeoGAF thread - while there was an initial mistake regarding 20 vs 40 ALUs (I think that's what they referred to them as) that Beyond3D corrected NeoGAF about, NeoGAF has made more progress than Beyond3D on actually analysing it.


no t true at all thrakter was coming out with a wild hypothesis of 470 gflops, and beyond3d memeber came and corrected him there is not one single fact neogaf came up with just assumptions so far and not even good ones.

What! O_O , Wasnt you saying how much of a trusted site it was awhile ago? or was that only when they where agreeing with you?

I did trust them but then i found beyond3d, the only person that really came with something conclusive is AlStrong a mod at beyond3d, which is where neogaf got there numers from for the wiiu gflops, at first neogaf though it was 160 sp instead of 320sp.



zero129 said:
Imo i dont think anyone else should listen to another thing you say on both the WiiU and the x8 as clearly its easy to see your biased to only 1 system.

Your almost like Ninjas clone i can see why he likes to listen to you

Wow that's an intelligent response to my post. Please prove me wrong that what I said is not true.

1) MS's HDDs are way more expensive and are slower than what we can get in retail channels for the same price. I cannot buy an SSD for the Xbox 360, or a 1TB 2.5 inch hard drive. I am stuck buying a slow 5400 rpm POS Toshiba or Hitachi mechanical 250GB drive with MS. Amazing!! 

2) Shall we count the # of Xbox 360 exclusive titles/franchisees worth buying? I just bought Fable 1 and 3 for my PC for $5 on Amazon. That leaves me with Gears of War, Halo and Forza. The only 3 franchises I care to purchase considering I have a high-end gaming PC. To me that makes Xbox 360 a budget PC with just 3 key franchisees worth buying and crappy graphics for multi-platform games I'd rather buy for me PC.

3) Xbox Live fees - Sony offers the option of PSN+ (with free games) or PSN (with free online gaming).

So I stated facts and you attacked me for being biased? 

Go ahead ask any PC gamer which console is the most redundant on any PC hardware forum. I can almost guarantee almost everyone with a high-end gaming PC will tell you that Xbox 1 and 360 were the most redundant consoles for our userbase. 



Trim those quote trees, guys. ;)

And for those of you who weren't into it or around then, we had spec wars like this at the start of the 6th and 7th gens too, and people claimed the PS2 was stronger than the Xbox and Gamecube or the 360 was stronger than the PS3 based on specs like these Wii U ones.



curl-6 said:
Trim those quote trees, guys. ;)

And for those of you who weren't into it or around then, we had spec wars like this at the start of the 6th and 7th gens too, and people claimed the PS2 was stronger than the Xbox and Gamecube or the 360 was stronger than the PS3 based on specs like these Wii U ones.


Hate to burst your bubble but the specs speak volumes right now whereas in the 6th and 7th gen the difference between the core consoles was negliable. 

The Wii U's max power draw is very low. It is likely that the PS4/next-box will not follow that suit and will probably use arounf 100W more power. Fact is the Wii U has yet to demonstrate power that suggests it is next-gen ready - there is as of yet no "PGR3" for the Wii U. Until such a game is released, it will not be considered a next-gen console. 



Around the Network
BlueFalcon said:
zero129 said:
Imo i dont think anyone else should listen to another thing you say on both the WiiU and the x8 as clearly its easy to see your biased to only 1 system.

Your almost like Ninjas clone i can see why he likes to listen to you

Wow that's an intelligent response to my post. Please prove me wrong that what I said is not true.

1) MS's HDDs are way more expensive and are slower than what we can get in retail channels for the same price. I cannot buy an SSD for the Xbox 360, or a 1TB 2.5 inch hard drive. I am stuck buying a slow 5400 rpm POS Toshiba or Hitachi mechanical 250GB drive with MS. Amazing!! 

2) Shall we count the # of Xbox 360 exclusive titles/franchisees worth buying? I just bought Fable 1 and 3 for my PC for $5 on Amazon. That leaves me with Gears of War, Halo and Forza. The only 3 franchises I care to purchase considering I have a high-end gaming PC. To me that makes Xbox 360 a budget PC with just 3 key franchisees worth buying and crappy graphics for multi-platform games I'd rather buy for me PC.

3) Xbox Live fees - Sony offers the option of PSN+ (with free games) or PSN (with free online gaming).

So I stated facts and you attacked me for being biased? 

Go ahead ask any PC gamer which console is the most redundant on any PC hardware forum. I can almost guarantee almost everyone with a high-end gaming PC will tell you that Xbox 1 and 360 were the most redundant consoles for our userbase. 


that's what happens to me as well, people with strong loyalities to a company will always claim your biased if you say anything negative even though its a fact, in reality we just want the best product for are money.



Mazty said:
curl-6 said:
Trim those quote trees, guys. ;)

And for those of you who weren't into it or around then, we had spec wars like this at the start of the 6th and 7th gens too, and people claimed the PS2 was stronger than the Xbox and Gamecube or the 360 was stronger than the PS3 based on specs like these Wii U ones.


Hate to burst your bubble but the specs speak volumes right now whereas in the 6th and 7th gen the difference between the core consoles was negliable. 

The Wii U's max power draw is very low. It is likely that the PS4/next-box will not follow that suit and will probably use arounf 100W more power. Fact is the Wii U has yet to demonstrate power that suggests it is next-gen ready - there is as of yet no "PGR3" for the Wii U. Until such a game is released, it will not be considered a next-gen console. 

There's a whole 'nother thread for this, but power doesn't determine generations, product iterations do. I'm not expecting the Wii U to rival what the Nextbox and PS4 do graphically, and that doesn't bother me.

The specs we have now are incomplete and unclear. You can't determine a console's true processing capabilities from its power draw.



ninjablade said:
Kaizar said:
ninjablade said:
Kaizar said:
zero129 said:
ninjablade said:
curl-6 said:
ninjablade said:
curl-6 said:
ninjablade said:
curl-6 said:
ninjablade said:

we do have the specs for the most part http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/df-hardware-wii-u-graphics-power-finally-revealed

look under my sig those are all confirmed specs barring some kind of miracle.

The specs are incomplete, and some of them are assumptions rather than fact.


did you read the article, most of it is cold hard facts, at first some people said eurogamer rushed the article but its going on 2 days now and nobody corrected anything, even neogaf are accepting the 352 gflops numbers now here is quote i found intersting in the comment section.

 

Am I the only one being shocked by the fact that the Wii U CPU is basically the same type that I had in my 1998 PowerMac G3?! Am I correct here, it's basically a triple-core overclocked PowerPC 750?!! ROFLMAO! No wonder the poor ports and performance, the GPU on that thing is no powerhouse by any means but that ancient CPU architecture is choking it blue. A 3DFX Voodoo2 would have been a better match. They'd be better off if they'd stuck a current low-end, dual-core celeron in there instead but I guess they got a ridiculously good deal on tons of left-over GC/Wii CPU's laying around the manufacturers warehouse. Facepalm Nintendo, facepalm...

I read the article; there's plenty of unknown factors and guesstimates. And I'm not sure how a troll post helps your point?

i don't see how its a troll post it actaully makes sense, why they put such a weak cpu in the machine, anyway i believe DF, they have a amazing track record, no reason to doubt them and nobody has proved them wrong. 

"I guess they got a ridiculously good deal on tons of left-over GC/Wii CPU's laying around the manufacturers warehouse. Facepalm Nintendo, facepalm..." That's trolling. People who drop those kind of lines strike me as people who are not going to give an objective perspective on Nintendo hardware. Not to mention, it hasn't been proven that the Wii U CPU is a "triple core overclocked PowerPC 750", in fact it's most likely not. It might be based on it for backwards compatibility purposes, but newer chips are often "based" on older ones because they're a direct descendent, just with improvements that come over time like large/faster caches, more cores, etc.

Nobody has proven Digital Foundry's analysis right either. What will prove it one way or another are games that come out once developers get a handle on the system's innards.


seems to me like he's a nintendo fan thats updset about the cpu but anything negative is called trolling. as i 360 fan, DF  broke the first real news about ps4 being more powerful and i believed them, i will alway trust DF and beyond3d, some those guys on neogaf are using wishful thinking instead of hard facts, most of them thrakter, bigassian claimg 600 flops, while more reasonable members told them 300-350 gflops.

See you only like to believe the stuff that agrees with what you want to believe without taking other facts into account. This is all ill say on the subject to you as clearly you have no idea what your talking about when it comes to this..


Yep, both ninjablade & Chark are PS fanboys who deny everything that shows that Nintendo is doing even 1 good thing during the present.

its like Dealing with 2D fanboys, except at least the 2D fanboys admit that they have a 2D agenda.

But it's like both PS fanboys & 2D fanboys have nothing else better to do but spend all day attacking everything in opposition.

I own Playstation & Nintendo & Sega Systems.

But I can only afford 2 consoles & 2 handhelds at a time (during any one Generation) but luckily the Vita library made it so I could just save money for a 3DS XL instead of PS Vita, but then the 3D effect in the Newer 3DS games made me save money for something else instead of 3DS XL.

So I just got extra cash laying around outside of what I got plan for Wii U & PS4. And the 3D movies in theaters won't cut it, LOL.

i don't even own a a ps3, how can i be a sony fanboy, lol


Well, as long as you are not one of those 2D fanboys that wish that 3D would die from the industry then I'll stop talking smack, LOL.

but your Xbox only thing sounds like a American only philosophy that is use for a white supremacist mentality to brainwash into kids like shown in Nightline (with Ted whomever, that was shown earlier during the 21st century)

i'm going ps4 nextgen, it will the most powerful, and i'm happy they are not focusing on motion controls, which i hate.


Both WiiMote + Nunchuck is way more better for gaming , just try Resident Evil 4 Wii or some other FPS game with these controls.

Im sorry if Sony or Microsoft gave you a bad fps Motion control experience.



curl-6 said:
Trim those quote trees, guys. ;)

And for those of you who weren't into it or around then, we had spec wars like this at the start of the 6th and 7th gens too, and people claimed the PS2 was stronger than the Xbox and Gamecube or the 360 was stronger than the PS3 based on specs like these Wii U ones.

This is completely different. PC gamers now have an entire history of AMD GPUs spanning from HD7000 and below. When the GPU in Xbox 360 came out, we didn't even have a unified shader GPU architecture on the PC as that only arrived in 2006. At Xbox 360's launch time this made it impossible to estimate or understand how the GPU compared to PC parts. After HD2000 series released, we knew that Xbox 360's GPU was more powerful than PS3's RSX. That's not even up for debate among people who researched the specs. You can say without a shadow of a doubt that the GPU inside Xbox 360 is more powerful if you don't talk about the CPUs.

We know the die size of Wii U's GPU and the console's total maximum power consumption and die sizes of all of the important R700 chips made on 40nm nodes. There is no magic sauce in R700 GPU design. It uses an outdated VLIW architecture. If the architecture is not Graphics Core Next, the GPU in Wii U is already outdated automatically, no matter what it is because we know it's a 40nm part made by AMD and there are no 40nm GCN GPUs. If the power consumption of the Wii U in games is 35-40W, the console cannot be powerful. It's just not possible. So yes, you definitely can estimate the performance of hardware looking at GPU manufacturing nodes and the total power consumption, especially since you can rule out that Wii U does not use the most advanced GPU architectures (Kepler or Graphics Core Next). That means the GPU is automatically less efficient per clock cycle.

Look at the size of flagship GPUs on the PC. They are nearly the size of the Wii U itself. AMD's flagship HD7970GE uses 235W of power, manufactured on 28nm node (which is 60% more efficient than 40nm one at the same operating transistor frequency). This would mean that GPU inside the Wii U would use 587W of power if it were made on 40nm node of Wii U and clocked at 1.05Ghz. Based on this estimate alone, and Wii U's power usage of 35W in games, the GPU in the Wii U is 16.7x slower than an HD7970GE (587W / 35W ~ 16.7x)

No matter how you look at it, from a power consumption, die size, or maximum specs of R700 vs. die size comparison, you end up arriving at very similar conclusion = Wii U's GPU is extremely underpowered to be a next generation console.



BlueFalcon said:
curl-6 said:
Trim those quote trees, guys. ;)

And for those of you who weren't into it or around then, we had spec wars like this at the start of the 6th and 7th gens too, and people claimed the PS2 was stronger than the Xbox and Gamecube or the 360 was stronger than the PS3 based on specs like these Wii U ones.

This is completely different. PC gamers now have an entire history of AMD GPUs spanning from HD7000 and below. When the GPU in Xbox 360 came out, we didn't even have a unified shader GPU architecture on the PC as that only arrived in 2006. At Xbox 360's launch time this made it impossible to estimate or understand how the GPU compared to PC parts.

We know the die size of Wii U's GPU and the console's total maximum power consumption and die sizes of all of the important R700 chips made on 40nm nodes. There is no magic in GPU design. If the architecture is not Graphics Core Next, the GPU in Wii U is already outdated automatically, no matter what it is. If the power consumption of the Wii U in games is 35-40W, the console cannot be powerful. It's just not possible. 

Look at the size of flagship GPUs on the PC. They are nearly the size of the Wii U itself on their own. They also use 230-290W of power, on 28nm node (which is 60% more efficient than 40nm one). This would mean those GPUs would use 368-464W of power if they were made on 40nm node of Wii U. Also, since the GPU inside the Wii U is clocked at 550mhz, that's only HALF of the clock speeds of today's flagship cards. That means a Wii U GPU with 1.05Ghz clocks of modern GPUs made on 40nm node would use yet again 2x more 50% more power due to go from 550mhz to 1.05ghz or 736-928W of power if it were to be exactly as efficient in its GPU architecture as today's high-end GPUs. Based on this estimate alone, and Wii U's power usage of 35W in games, the GPU in the Wii U is roughly 21-25x slower than a GTX690.

21-25x slower than a GTX690 would put the Wii U's GPU power at 18 VP, or roughly only 40-50% more than the GPUs in Xbox 360/PS3.

No matter how you look at it, from a power consumption, die size, or maximum specs of R700 vs. die size comparison, you end up arriving at very similar conclusion = Wii U's GPU is extremely underpowered to be a next generation console.

You still need to know all of the customizations made to Latte, which we don't yet. It's not off-the-shelf.

You and Matzy seem to be under the mistaken impression that I'm arguing for a "top of the line PC"/"rivals PS4/720" level of power in Wii U. I'm not. I'm saying that (A) the evidence so far suggests it is more powerful than the PS3 and 360, and (B) that we don't know enough to make a conclusive ruling yet.

50% better than PS360 is fine by me. It's about what I expected.

It should also be noted that as a console, Wii U has the advantage of having uniform innards which means games can be more specifically optimised for it than PC games. Consoles always blow away what a PC with the same amount of raw power can do in gaming because of this, so directly comparing it to PC parts often paints an inaccurate picture.