Based on what someone told me, Black Ops 2 would be the objectively superior game. Even though it's slightly less acclaimed than those other two, it more than makes up for it by being extremely more popular. That means it is of the highest quality. As far as I know, this is a fact; you can disagree with me but just know that you would disagreeing with fact.

Not trying to be rude OP, but I hate threads like these. None of them are "better" than the other, it's all preference. Somebody might prefer the fast pace of Cod compared to Battlefield, but that doesn't make it better...

halo or battlefield is like gran turismo or mario kart for me, not comparable. didn't play blops2 and even if, i don't know the battlefield for console version so yeah, no help for you from me

battlefield has not that many game modes but it's no disadvanatge for battlefield because that game wouldn't work with game modes from halo or something^^

Battlefield 3 by a mile.

Sniper shoots me, I go hop in a tank and destroy the building he's hiding on.

Pure bliss.

CoD multiplayer can be decent with friends but it get's really repetitive, it's the zombies mode that makes it great.
If we are only talking multiplayer I'd say Battlefield 3 is your best bet.

I'm not a fan of Halo's multiplayer but I do enjoy the campaigns.

To be honest I still prefer UT, Tribes and Quake over these games.

However if I have to pick, I say Black Ops II marginally better than Halo 4.