I didn't know that you could choose the body part to atack in Monster Hunter. In my brief experience with Tri, I didn't notice it.

Now I can see the comparision, althought I see it more like an improvement over Xenoblade mechanics rather than being influenced by Monster Hunter.

Wyrdness said: Is NinjaBlade still trying to make us believe in his dream world oh dear, here is the 360 version of RDR in 720p and here is the trailer of X. The first 15 seconds of X's trailer shows how much more detailed X is, it's not even a contest look at the character models, plant life and animations and this is not even a direct trailer of the game. When we get a direct trailer it'll look even better but look at the following screen, even in the poor quality you can see the detail.

looks blurry as heck, i can hardly make out what i'm looking at, i understand its the first impressive looking game on wii u, it must be better then everything else, lol, AC3 looks like it a whole different level graphicly but the framerate is horrible so i can't really compare it but to each his own.

Looks amazing.

It's everything I asked for, Xenoblade with co-op.

This game doesn't really look next generation in my opinion. The opening shot with the player running by the ocean, the water looks like a flat polygon, no waves. The water's edge where it meets the land isn't even a smooth curve, it's very blocky. Later in the trailer with the player fighting in a field filed with bushes the camera does a slight move and the bushes all rotate to face the camera indicating they are simply flat sprites & not modeled in any way. This is the same way the trees were done in Mario 64, or the bushes in Dear Ester, they look good in stills but in motion it's distracting. The part where the player enters the robot and flies off of the mountain top the world seems to be fairly spars aside from the mountains themselves, it makes me wonder how much pop-up there will be when moving around.
Those main three points are why, in my eyes this game doesn't look "nex gen".
It could be a very good game though, but the graphics are just "good for 7th gen" IMHO.

New gif:

the flaws become very apparent once you watch the video in 720p in full screen but you have to understand most nintendo fans are not used currentgen graphics, i imagine if a game, like killzone3, god of war 3 and halo 4 came out on wiiu they would say it looks better then currentgen.

Ninjablade is just trying to annoy the people who came to this thread because they are excited for this game. Comparing it to RDR is laughable. Choose Halo4 or The Last of Us even...but RDR? lol. The world being displayed in X is literally about 10-20X the size, with details in the distance still visible. Those details include realistic mist from waterfalls, grass, moving objects... and it's all done with incredible lighting. The speeder moving over the landscape reminds me of the Attack of the Clones. Everytime I watch this trailer I appreciate the graphical detail more...and it gets me more excited for the game!

how do you know this have you played the game, i think RDR looks much better, i'm sure you will find many with a similer opinion, once direct feed video come out and 720p pics are released you will see all the flaws, that i have already spotted in the video.

Wyrdness said: New gif:

hmm they should add effects of water splashing and dust flying up when the tail swings

would have been a nice detail

I said I was done but you are so ignorant I couldn't resist....

You are saying this image...

have more detail than this?