By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - New Monolith Soft Game - Codenamed "X" - In-game footage!

irstupid on 23 January 2013
Tarumon said:
chriscox1121 said:
It does have a next gen look to it after watching it again. The backdrop is one of the biggest standouts. What does this say about square?


They should rename themselves Square Eunichs?  They need to revie the FF franchise with gameplay.....


WHY revive FF games.  FF games aren't anything special.  Each new game is a new story, new world, new characters.  What makes a game with FF in the title better than Xenoblade?

Just think of this game as the new FF game.  Or what makes the words Final Fantasy, make the game better to you?



Around the Network
ninjablade on 23 January 2013
osed125 said:
ninjablade said:
Wyrdness said:
osed125 said:
ninjablade said:
zero129 said:

No, just no. As someone who has played RDR i can honestly say it doesnt look as good as this game. First RDR isnt even running in 720P on the PS3, it has alot of jaggies. And just doesnt look no where near as smooth or good as Xenoblade 2 so stop kidding yourself..

thanks you for explaining but i'm talking about the 360 verion which does run 720p and looks amazing, you can't deny DDR has more detail, much better lighting and amazing draw distance, and way more things going on, can X2 look better maybe, but i can see it so far from 1 minut of blurry gameplay footage, is the iq perfect, is the framerate smooth i don't yet, so you are the one being biased, lol.

Wow, just...wow...

I know right, RDR doesn't even match up to other current gen games graphically on the PS3 and 360.

http://24.media.tumblr.com/7b0ef7c1225e9730324cb61f9c585da7/tumblr_mfsy2hTZN61qzqt8do4_250.gif

Holy sh*t man that tree looks amazing!!


listen i'm just calling it like it is,RDR has way more detail, much better lighting, that makes the game look better to me, now granted i need to see more of X2 before i make a final judgment, i'm not amazed so far, the game looks great graphicly and gameplay wise, i just don't think its amzing lookin better then 360/ps3 games.



Play4Fun on 23 January 2013
ninjablade said:
Wyrdness said:
osed125 said:
ninjablade said:
zero129 said:

No, just no. As someone who has played RDR i can honestly say it doesnt look as good as this game. First RDR isnt even running in 720P on the PS3, it has alot of jaggies. And just doesnt look no where near as smooth or good as Xenoblade 2 so stop kidding yourself..

thanks you for explaining but i'm talking about the 360 verion which does run 720p and looks amazing, you can't deny DDR has more detail, much better lighting and amazing draw distance, and way more things going on, can X2 look better maybe, but i can see it so far from 1 minut of blurry gameplay footage, is the iq perfect, is the framerate smooth i don't yet, so you are the one being biased, lol.

Wow, just...wow...

I know right, RDR doesn't even match up to other current gen games graphically on the PS3 and 360.

http://24.media.tumblr.com/7b0ef7c1225e9730324cb61f9c585da7/tumblr_mfsy2hTZN61qzqt8do4_250.gif


(Don't know where to find a bigger RDR GIF so...)

Still, c'mon son. Stop this.



ishiki on 23 January 2013

I don't really like color Pallette and it looks washed out (possibly partially from youtube). Xenoblade was better in this reguard. 

Everything else looks pretty amazing though. Witcher 2, and Skyrim PC still look quite a bit better though, but consolewise it's probably the top from a technical perspective. I like the colors and architecture a lot more in xenoblade. But we've only seen snippets so far. The story's what I'd want to know more, because the story in xenoblade was the worst in the xeno series by far imo. So hopefully they fix that.



osed125 on 23 January 2013
Play4Fun said:
ninjablade said:
Wyrdness said:
osed125 said:
ninjablade said:
zero129 said:

No, just no. As someone who has played RDR i can honestly say it doesnt look as good as this game. First RDR isnt even running in 720P on the PS3, it has alot of jaggies. And just doesnt look no where near as smooth or good as Xenoblade 2 so stop kidding yourself..

thanks you for explaining but i'm talking about the 360 verion which does run 720p and looks amazing, you can't deny DDR has more detail, much better lighting and amazing draw distance, and way more things going on, can X2 look better maybe, but i can see it so far from 1 minut of blurry gameplay footage, is the iq perfect, is the framerate smooth i don't yet, so you are the one being biased, lol.

Wow, just...wow...

I know right, RDR doesn't even match up to other current gen games graphically on the PS3 and 360.

http://24.media.tumblr.com/7b0ef7c1225e9730324cb61f9c585da7/tumblr_mfsy2hTZN61qzqt8do4_250.gif

(Don't know where to find a bigger RDR GIF so...)

Still, c'mon son. Stop this.

He's a lost cause, let him live in his crazy world.



Nintendo and PC gamer

Around the Network
Wyrdness on 23 January 2013
ninjablade said:

http://24.media.tumblr.com/7b0ef7c1225e9730324cb61f9c585da7/tumblr_mfsy2hTZN61qzqt8do4_250.gif


ROFL.

 

" target="_blank" class="link">http://24.media.tumblr.com/7b0ef7c1225e9730324cb61f9c585da7/tumblr_mfsy2hTZN61qzqt8do4_250.gif[/img]


 

 

 

 



ninjablade on 23 January 2013
Play4Fun said:
ninjablade said:
Wyrdness said:
osed125 said:
ninjablade said:
zero129 said:

No, just no. As someone who has played RDR i can honestly say it doesnt look as good as this game. First RDR isnt even running in 720P on the PS3, it has alot of jaggies. And just doesnt look no where near as smooth or good as Xenoblade 2 so stop kidding yourself..

thanks you for explaining but i'm talking about the 360 verion which does run 720p and looks amazing, you can't deny DDR has more detail, much better lighting and amazing draw distance, and way more things going on, can X2 look better maybe, but i can see it so far from 1 minut of blurry gameplay footage, is the iq perfect, is the framerate smooth i don't yet, so you are the one being biased, lol.

Wow, just...wow...

I know right, RDR doesn't even match up to other current gen games graphically on the PS3 and 360.

http://24.media.tumblr.com/7b0ef7c1225e9730324cb61f9c585da7/tumblr_mfsy2hTZN61qzqt8do4_250.gif


(Don't know where to find a bigger RDR GIF so...)

Still, c'mon son. Stop this.


"[ img ]http://i.imgur.com/eMPOG.jpg"[ /img ]

 

"[ img ]" and a closing tag "[ /img ]"



forest-spirit on 23 January 2013

Monolith Soft was serious about becoming the Bethesda of Japan. Can not wait!



Ji99saw on 23 January 2013

That was actually pretty underwhelming it looks extremely generic and cookie cutter , no wonder JRPGs are in trouble when they all look the same. As far as draw distances go it fails because it has no architecture on the ground to render so it's literally one big blank sand box but people are gushing over it. I agree with ninja RDR looks far superior in terms of technical execution with various objects, trees,weather,buildings and more all while having great draw distances and scenery (now I want to play RDR). I would also add I think The Witcher 2 destroys this game in terms of graphics also to be honest.



Without order nothing can exist - without chaos nothing can evolve.

"I don't debate, I just give you that work"- Ji99saw

Tarumon on 23 January 2013
irstupid said:
Tarumon said:
chriscox1121 said:
It does have a next gen look to it after watching it again. The backdrop is one of the biggest standouts. What does this say about square?


They should rename themselves Square Eunichs?  They need to revie the FF franchise with gameplay.....


WHY revive FF games.  FF games aren't anything special.  Each new game is a new story, new world, new characters.  What makes a game with FF in the title better than Xenoblade?

Just think of this game as the new FF game.  Or what makes the words Final Fantasy, make the game better to you?


This game is the next Xenoblade.  FF is special to me just like Zelda is special to me.  Appreciating new IPs does not conflict with fondness and appreciation for old franchises.