Turkish said:

There is a big difference.:P Unless the 7770 is in crossfire it doesn't even come close to the 7870.

D-Joe said:

I have info and if he try lie to me i can make him disappear forever.

Btw read my edit

Even if the 4GB of GDDR5 is not true, an HD7870 style GPU rumored for PS4 is much more powerful than the ~HD7770 GPU rumored in the 720. Based on #s, it doesn't sound like a big difference, but it's huge (http://www.techspot.com/review/615-far-cry-3-performance/page3.html). These rumors better be false for MS's sake or their console is dead in the water graphically against PS4 long-term.

That would make a difference, but how much of a visible difference at 1080P sitting 10 feet from the screen is the question (can you really tell medium from high settings that far away from the TV?). Still rumors, and I still think the PS4's GPU will not be quite that powerful.

Even if it's clocked slower, a 2.8-3.0ghz 4-core APU APU would mop the floor with a 1.6ghz 8-core CPU. Most game code doesn't land itself well to parallel processing beyond 4 threads. At 50% parallel coding, the difference between 2 similarly powerful 4-core and 8-core CPUs is minimal. The clock speed and instructions per clock would matter more. In that case, for games a fast 4-core CPU >>>> slow 8-core CPU.

I agree with you partially on this, definitely better, but with good optomization the gap might not be as huge as you would think. What if the PS4's CPU ended up clocking in closer to 2.2-2.6GHz?

It's not about games at 4K. It's about multi-media capabilities long-term. If 4K TVs take off in 4-5 years, then PS4 will enjoy a multi-media advantage like PS3 did with BluRay. Since consoles are not used just for games, any advantage in multi-media capabilities in the living room is important.

These consoles will be all about streaming when you talk about multimedia, we are a LOOOOOOOOONNNNG way off from streaming 4k content as a standard, a very, very long way off. If 4k TVs take off in 4-5 years, streaming standards will probably take at least another 4 years to begin to catch up, and most people will still be using 1080p Bluerays anyway, so this would not help much during the coming gen. This is why I don't think it will be a focus, 1080P in 3D at 30-60FPS would be very good IMO.

I didn't say this one, lol.

That's because last generation, the actual components in Wii, PS3 and Xbox 360 were all different. It was a lot more difficult to make the comparison. Since AMD is making GPUs for all of the next gen consoles, you can compare the GPU processing power directly if you know the specs/GPU architecture/generation. The comparison would not be too dissimilar to comparing GPU specs on the PC from AMD's own product stack. For this reason the specs comparison is pretty relevant. For the first time one company is making the GPUs for all 3 next gen consoles.  Also, if 1 console has 8 core AMD Jaguar CPU and the other has a 4-core AMD APU, it's also pretty much a done deal that the APU system has the faster CPU because Jaguars are low-end tablet CPU cores, but AMD's APUs have their high performance (relative to AMD's product stack) CPU cores. 

I hope your infos are right because I expect more from the next-gen.

I don't know PS4,but don't worry for Durango

Also i know why meida copying/repeating each others now...ha.

Well,i'm tired,don't wanna care this "prediction" anymore