By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Looks like next xbox is gonna be a good deal less powerful then PS4

Hynad said:
ninjablade said:

i will still stick with with what i said ps3 looks to be a good deal more powerful, here is a post that sums up how i feel

here is a good post from neogaf

I don't think they are trying to compete in the tech arms race with Sony. They apparently spent less of their budget on GPU, 12CUs vs 18. And made some performance sacrifices to the memory system to have the quantity required for heavy non-game functions. I don't think it's a PS2 and Xbox difference in aggregate performance. However in practical terms, I doubt the two will be as closely matched as the PS3/X360 generation. From what we "know", that is stuff DF confirmed through multiple independent sources, PS4 easily seems stronger. I think the burden of proof lies with those people that claim the large difference in GPU logic is overcome by the move DMAs. Seems like space age technology. Maybe MS did have an inside deal with AMD and its GPU tech is a few years ahead, but I doubt it.

yes we a have a developer commenting that they are close, we also had the same thing with wiiu, that developer later changed his tune from more powerful to on par with current gen and released an inferior port called darksiders.


Could you stop bumping your own thread by repeating the same damn biased shit all the time? Please?

And since you keep mentioning that the XBox 360 is your only console this gen, why don't you give us your XBox Live ID? 

jazes321 is my live id and i don't get why i'm being biased, you called biased  in another thread towards microsoft and now i'm biased towards sony, do me a favor and put me on ignore and don't post in my threads, now i'm biased cause i believe the specs and I believe  DF, could the 4 data engine pull off a miracle, maybe but i doubt it.



Around the Network
ninjablade said:
Hynad said:
ninjablade said:

i will still stick with with what i said ps3 looks to be a good deal more powerful, here is a post that sums up how i feel

here is a good post from neogaf

I don't think they are trying to compete in the tech arms race with Sony. They apparently spent less of their budget on GPU, 12CUs vs 18. And made some performance sacrifices to the memory system to have the quantity required for heavy non-game functions. I don't think it's a PS2 and Xbox difference in aggregate performance. However in practical terms, I doubt the two will be as closely matched as the PS3/X360 generation. From what we "know", that is stuff DF confirmed through multiple independent sources, PS4 easily seems stronger. I think the burden of proof lies with those people that claim the large difference in GPU logic is overcome by the move DMAs. Seems like space age technology. Maybe MS did have an inside deal with AMD and its GPU tech is a few years ahead, but I doubt it.

yes we a have a developer commenting that they are close, we also had the same thing with wiiu, that developer later changed his tune from more powerful to on par with current gen and released an inferior port called darksiders.


Could you stop bumping your own thread by repeating the same damn biased shit all the time? Please?

And since you keep mentioning that the XBox 360 is your only console this gen, why don't you give us your XBox Live ID? 

jazes321 is my live id and i don't get why i'm being biased, you called biased  in another thread towards microsoft and now i'm biased towards sony, do me a favor and put me on ignore and don't post in my threads, now i'm biased cause i believe the specs and I believe  DF, could the 4 data engine pull off a miracle, maybe but i doubt it.


No, your shit is biased because you ignore the rumors that go against the ones that you accepted as facts.

News flash, those are rumors. Nothing is concrete as long as no official announcements have been made by the manufacturers.

And you keep bumping your own thread, without having anything to talk about. You keep on posting the same damn stuff all the time.

Oh, and of course, RAM is everything! ¬_¬



Hynad said:
ninjablade said:
Hynad said:
ninjablade said:

i will still stick with with what i said ps3 looks to be a good deal more powerful, here is a post that sums up how i feel

here is a good post from neogaf

I don't think they are trying to compete in the tech arms race with Sony. They apparently spent less of their budget on GPU, 12CUs vs 18. And made some performance sacrifices to the memory system to have the quantity required for heavy non-game functions. I don't think it's a PS2 and Xbox difference in aggregate performance. However in practical terms, I doubt the two will be as closely matched as the PS3/X360 generation. From what we "know", that is stuff DF confirmed through multiple independent sources, PS4 easily seems stronger. I think the burden of proof lies with those people that claim the large difference in GPU logic is overcome by the move DMAs. Seems like space age technology. Maybe MS did have an inside deal with AMD and its GPU tech is a few years ahead, but I doubt it.

yes we a have a developer commenting that they are close, we also had the same thing with wiiu, that developer later changed his tune from more powerful to on par with current gen and released an inferior port called darksiders.


Could you stop bumping your own thread by repeating the same damn biased shit all the time? Please?

And since you keep mentioning that the XBox 360 is your only console this gen, why don't you give us your XBox Live ID? 

jazes321 is my live id and i don't get why i'm being biased, you called biased  in another thread towards microsoft and now i'm biased towards sony, do me a favor and put me on ignore and don't post in my threads, now i'm biased cause i believe the specs and I believe  DF, could the 4 data engine pull off a miracle, maybe but i doubt it.


No, your shit is biased because you ignore the rumors that go against the ones that you accepted as facts.

News flash, those are rumors. Nothing is concrete as long as no official announcements have been mae by the manufacturers.

i never accepted anything as facts, every insider at neogaf has confirmed both the orbis and durungo specs, should i just ignore them, i'm just very skeptical at the 4 data engines being able to compete with a system thats made for powerful graphics and gaming, while microsoft has different plans just by looking at the specs and ram, anything is still possible but for now its looking like sony will have a more powerful system and for your infromation i have'nt bumped this thread in quite a while, just responding to some people, sorry if that bothers you.



ninjablade said:
Hynad said:
ninjablade said:
Hynad said:
ninjablade said:

i will still stick with with what i said ps3 looks to be a good deal more powerful, here is a post that sums up how i feel

here is a good post from neogaf

I don't think they are trying to compete in the tech arms race with Sony. They apparently spent less of their budget on GPU, 12CUs vs 18. And made some performance sacrifices to the memory system to have the quantity required for heavy non-game functions. I don't think it's a PS2 and Xbox difference in aggregate performance. However in practical terms, I doubt the two will be as closely matched as the PS3/X360 generation. From what we "know", that is stuff DF confirmed through multiple independent sources, PS4 easily seems stronger. I think the burden of proof lies with those people that claim the large difference in GPU logic is overcome by the move DMAs. Seems like space age technology. Maybe MS did have an inside deal with AMD and its GPU tech is a few years ahead, but I doubt it.

yes we a have a developer commenting that they are close, we also had the same thing with wiiu, that developer later changed his tune from more powerful to on par with current gen and released an inferior port called darksiders.


Could you stop bumping your own thread by repeating the same damn biased shit all the time? Please?

And since you keep mentioning that the XBox 360 is your only console this gen, why don't you give us your XBox Live ID? 

jazes321 is my live id and i don't get why i'm being biased, you called biased  in another thread towards microsoft and now i'm biased towards sony, do me a favor and put me on ignore and don't post in my threads, now i'm biased cause i believe the specs and I believe  DF, could the 4 data engine pull off a miracle, maybe but i doubt it.


No, your shit is biased because you ignore the rumors that go against the ones that you accepted as facts.

News flash, those are rumors. Nothing is concrete as long as no official announcements have been mae by the manufacturers.

i never accepted anything as facts, every insider at neogaf has confirmed both the orbis and durungo specs, should i just ignore them, i'm just very skeptical at the 4 data engines being able to compete with a system thats made for powerful graphics and gaming, while microsoft has different plans just by looking at the specs and ram, anything is still possible but for now its looking like sony will have a more powerful system.

So if someone says that he's an insider, on neogaf, you automatically believe him? hmmmm. Interesting.





Pemalite said:
Turkish said:


I hope so. I recently bought a beast game pc with GTX670, so I'm good for atleast a year. When the new GK110s come out, i'll definetly upgrade.

And btw 7970 holding you back? :/


Check my screen Resolution. ;)


Dayuum! Btw I also have a H100, but its very loud. :/



Around the Network
Hynad said:
ninjablade said:
Hynad said:
ninjablade said:
Hynad said:
ninjablade said:

i will still stick with with what i said ps3 looks to be a good deal more powerful, here is a post that sums up how i feel

here is a good post from neogaf

I don't think they are trying to compete in the tech arms race with Sony. They apparently spent less of their budget on GPU, 12CUs vs 18. And made some performance sacrifices to the memory system to have the quantity required for heavy non-game functions. I don't think it's a PS2 and Xbox difference in aggregate performance. However in practical terms, I doubt the two will be as closely matched as the PS3/X360 generation. From what we "know", that is stuff DF confirmed through multiple independent sources, PS4 easily seems stronger. I think the burden of proof lies with those people that claim the large difference in GPU logic is overcome by the move DMAs. Seems like space age technology. Maybe MS did have an inside deal with AMD and its GPU tech is a few years ahead, but I doubt it.

yes we a have a developer commenting that they are close, we also had the same thing with wiiu, that developer later changed his tune from more powerful to on par with current gen and released an inferior port called darksiders.


Could you stop bumping your own thread by repeating the same damn biased shit all the time? Please?

And since you keep mentioning that the XBox 360 is your only console this gen, why don't you give us your XBox Live ID? 

jazes321 is my live id and i don't get why i'm being biased, you called biased  in another thread towards microsoft and now i'm biased towards sony, do me a favor and put me on ignore and don't post in my threads, now i'm biased cause i believe the specs and I believe  DF, could the 4 data engine pull off a miracle, maybe but i doubt it.


No, your shit is biased because you ignore the rumors that go against the ones that you accepted as facts.

News flash, those are rumors. Nothing is concrete as long as no official announcements have been mae by the manufacturers.

i never accepted anything as facts, every insider at neogaf has confirmed both the orbis and durungo specs, should i just ignore them, i'm just very skeptical at the 4 data engines being able to compete with a system thats made for powerful graphics and gaming, while microsoft has different plans just by looking at the specs and ram, anything is still possible but for now its looking like sony will have a more powerful system.

So if someone says that he's an insider, on neogaf, you automatically believe him? hmmmm. Interesting.



yes on neogaf you get banned right away if you make things up, and when you have many people backing them up, i believe it. but the biggest reason i believe it will more powerful is DF article you can always count on them.

proelite  is an insider but he seems to be very pro microsoft and could be doing damage control.



ninjablade said:
Hynad said:
ninjablade said:
Hynad said:
ninjablade said:
Hynad said:
ninjablade said:

i will still stick with with what i said ps3 looks to be a good deal more powerful, here is a post that sums up how i feel

here is a good post from neogaf

I don't think they are trying to compete in the tech arms race with Sony. They apparently spent less of their budget on GPU, 12CUs vs 18. And made some performance sacrifices to the memory system to have the quantity required for heavy non-game functions. I don't think it's a PS2 and Xbox difference in aggregate performance. However in practical terms, I doubt the two will be as closely matched as the PS3/X360 generation. From what we "know", that is stuff DF confirmed through multiple independent sources, PS4 easily seems stronger. I think the burden of proof lies with those people that claim the large difference in GPU logic is overcome by the move DMAs. Seems like space age technology. Maybe MS did have an inside deal with AMD and its GPU tech is a few years ahead, but I doubt it.

yes we a have a developer commenting that they are close, we also had the same thing with wiiu, that developer later changed his tune from more powerful to on par with current gen and released an inferior port called darksiders.


Could you stop bumping your own thread by repeating the same damn biased shit all the time? Please?

And since you keep mentioning that the XBox 360 is your only console this gen, why don't you give us your XBox Live ID? 

jazes321 is my live id and i don't get why i'm being biased, you called biased  in another thread towards microsoft and now i'm biased towards sony, do me a favor and put me on ignore and don't post in my threads, now i'm biased cause i believe the specs and I believe  DF, could the 4 data engine pull off a miracle, maybe but i doubt it.


No, your shit is biased because you ignore the rumors that go against the ones that you accepted as facts.

News flash, those are rumors. Nothing is concrete as long as no official announcements have been mae by the manufacturers.

i never accepted anything as facts, every insider at neogaf has confirmed both the orbis and durungo specs, should i just ignore them, i'm just very skeptical at the 4 data engines being able to compete with a system thats made for powerful graphics and gaming, while microsoft has different plans just by looking at the specs and ram, anything is still possible but for now its looking like sony will have a more powerful system.

So if someone says that he's an insider, on neogaf, you automatically believe him? hmmmm. Interesting.



yes on neogaf you get banned right away if you make things up, and when you have many people backing them up, i believe it. but the biggest reason i believe it will more powerful is DF article you can always count on them.

proelite  is an insider but he seems to be very pro microsoft and could be doing damage control.

Now your just making that up.



Nsanity said:
ninjablade said:
Hynad said:
ninjablade said:
Hynad said:
ninjablade said:
Hynad said:
ninjablade said:

i will still stick with with what i said ps3 looks to be a good deal more powerful, here is a post that sums up how i feel

here is a good post from neogaf

I don't think they are trying to compete in the tech arms race with Sony. They apparently spent less of their budget on GPU, 12CUs vs 18. And made some performance sacrifices to the memory system to have the quantity required for heavy non-game functions. I don't think it's a PS2 and Xbox difference in aggregate performance. However in practical terms, I doubt the two will be as closely matched as the PS3/X360 generation. From what we "know", that is stuff DF confirmed through multiple independent sources, PS4 easily seems stronger. I think the burden of proof lies with those people that claim the large difference in GPU logic is overcome by the move DMAs. Seems like space age technology. Maybe MS did have an inside deal with AMD and its GPU tech is a few years ahead, but I doubt it.

yes we a have a developer commenting that they are close, we also had the same thing with wiiu, that developer later changed his tune from more powerful to on par with current gen and released an inferior port called darksiders.


Could you stop bumping your own thread by repeating the same damn biased shit all the time? Please?

And since you keep mentioning that the XBox 360 is your only console this gen, why don't you give us your XBox Live ID? 

jazes321 is my live id and i don't get why i'm being biased, you called biased  in another thread towards microsoft and now i'm biased towards sony, do me a favor and put me on ignore and don't post in my threads, now i'm biased cause i believe the specs and I believe  DF, could the 4 data engine pull off a miracle, maybe but i doubt it.


No, your shit is biased because you ignore the rumors that go against the ones that you accepted as facts.

News flash, those are rumors. Nothing is concrete as long as no official announcements have been mae by the manufacturers.

i never accepted anything as facts, every insider at neogaf has confirmed both the orbis and durungo specs, should i just ignore them, i'm just very skeptical at the 4 data engines being able to compete with a system thats made for powerful graphics and gaming, while microsoft has different plans just by looking at the specs and ram, anything is still possible but for now its looking like sony will have a more powerful system.

So if someone says that he's an insider, on neogaf, you automatically believe him? hmmmm. Interesting.



yes on neogaf you get banned right away if you make things up, and when you have many people backing them up, i believe it. but the biggest reason i believe it will more powerful is DF article you can always count on them.

proelite  is an insider but he seems to be very pro microsoft and could be doing damage control.

Now your just making that up.


its in the rules if you claim your an insider and are spreading fud you get banned, wanna bet.



A Ubisoft dev said they are a wash.



Turkish said:


Dayuum! Btw I also have a H100, but its very loud. :/


It's a common problem with the Corsair Hydro coolers pump.
Several ways to fix it however.
1) RMA it.
2) Add a transister into the cable that draws power.
3) Connect it to a fan controller and turn it down untill it stops being noisy.
4) Ditch the Corsair fans and grab some Noctua NF-F12 fans.
5) Profit. :)

Sometimes it might just be an air bubble in the pump or in the hose, so just give it a few light taps on the pump itself and wiggle the hoses a little, mine was incredibly noisy when I first got it, whacked it onto a fan controller, never looked back, was certainly a step back from my old Noctua NH-D14 air cooler in terms of noise, I don't miss the monolothic size though.




www.youtube.com/@Pemalite