So those bombs must have been in the twin towers, yes? I think we've made a break through here. Now watch it all.

You're the only one saying bombs here. No break through since you still believe the ridiculous notion that for some reason thousands were involved in a stupid idiotic plot to rig a building with explosive that dont explode but melt through steel just to fly a plane in it to get the owner and media involved and have the owner decided to demo his own building to the fire department to go to war with iraq but not invade iraq first. And on the side have a missle thats as wide and as big as a plane shot at the most secrative buildings in the united states

it is either the conspiracy theory, or the crappiest skyscrapers the world has ever seen

Actors, military men, al quida, clean up crews, demo crew, politicians,,, ect ect maybe not thousand but quite a lot buddy. but whatever, thats the most insightful comment youll get from me.

http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/how-hot.htm

if fire did not cause the fall, what did?
structural damage, bad design, magic?

If you'd written a book about 911 in 1997,a fiction,the same people who believe the official story now,would criticize you for your stupid,non existing logic.
they would tell you that never in history a skyscraper has collapsed because of fire and that your stupid story has 3 such skycrapers on one single day,and even more ridiculous,that all 3 skyscrapers belong to the same person(larry silversteen),and that it is impossible that larry silversteen has done something very strange-an anti terror attack insurance_that made him a billionaire.(amazing coincidence)
Having dozens of huge buildings surrounding wtc1+2 being heavily damaged but no chance to collaps,but having a building 100yards away,being hit by a few stones collapsing out of sympathy?or was it suicide?
And let larry confess to pull it( and using an extremly cheap excuse (fireman=pull them,pull him.)and still find enough morons to believe this cheap excuse.
And let a handfull of arabs hijack airplanes with boxcutters without being clubbed to death by the passengers within 5minutes(in the USA,land of the brave)
And these arab muslim extremists drinking alcohol,kocaine and visiting strip bars(muslim extremists drinking alcohol and taking cocain-another impossible thing ,like jews being part of a nazi gang,but hey,its just a story. )

having the most expensive air defense system in the world-but completely useless and a president who is sitting in a children classroom refusing to leave this room though his country is under attack.

Noone would believe such a stupid story,as long as it is just fiction :but if it happens in real the people will believe it.
As Hitler said:the bigger the lie,the more people will acceppt the lie.

How about a combination.... GASP!!!! oh my god... you mean.... that it doesn't have to be just one cause? There was structural damage. there was uncontrolled fires. Not only that but building 5 also had a partial collapse from the fires but no one mentions that.

towards the end of one of the videos i posted myles goes into detail how convoluted the theory is and how ridiculous it sounds... the official story at least has science, common sense, logic, witness reports ect ect to back it up

Also, it was more than 3 buildings. Why would the owner be involved? Why would he say pull it to a fireman? Ontop of pulling it mean completely different things... you are really uninformed.

Read the bold please.