By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Microsoft beats google in facebookdeal

dallas said:
babuks said:
I think Google would have been better for Facebook. Surely they called for higher price but their technology is far superior than Bing. Anyhow, I don't think Facebook needs Google like search ability, so Bing is ok.



They can't use google.  Google is a direct competitor to Facebook with their Google+ service, and is closing in on being the #2 social media bc they have the following marketing practices that facebook lacks:

-a google+ tile on ever android smartphone.  People will click on tiles just to try them out, so google+ will grow bc of this

-Google+ threads are listed as part of the google search results for users that are logged into Google.  This will direct non-users into google+ as well as provide users of Google+ a way to search for old threads that they liked.  So, google+ will grow bc of this.

-Integration.  Google+ integrates things like Gmail, youtube (so they can put a youtube video in a google+ thread if they like),  google maps, as well as google play, where people can link to songs, etc

You make me laugh dude.

Google - glass half full! Forever and always...

Everyone else - glass half empty.

It's the same glass.



Around the Network

i have a G+ account, i dont really use it BUT when im on Youtube i have to log in with it and gmail for that matter. i have gmail attached to my outlook anyway but i use youtube all the time.

i dont have anything agaisnt Google though i rahter use Microsoft services since i like them better especially the email client Outlook that is amazing. And i´ve allways had my hotmail account to be my premiere e-mail.

Bing vs Google i couldnt care less. Bing in my country is still BETA and Google is superior here, as for maps, Nokia blows both of them out of water and Nokia is now with MS and soon Bing maps will be Nokia Maps.

SkyDrive is a HUGE help on my Life as well Office.



disolitude said:
dallas said:
babuks said:
I think Google would have been better for Facebook. Surely they called for higher price but their technology is far superior than Bing. Anyhow, I don't think Facebook needs Google like search ability, so Bing is ok.



They can't use google.  Google is a direct competitor to Facebook with their Google+ service, and is closing in on being the #2 social media bc they have the following marketing practices that facebook lacks:

-a google+ tile on ever android smartphone.  People will click on tiles just to try them out, so google+ will grow bc of this

-Google+ threads are listed as part of the google search results for users that are logged into Google.  This will direct non-users into google+ as well as provide users of Google+ a way to search for old threads that they liked.  So, google+ will grow bc of this.

-Integration.  Google+ integrates things like Gmail, youtube (so they can put a youtube video in a google+ thread if they like),  google maps, as well as google play, where people can link to songs, etc

You make me laugh dude.

Google - glass half full! Forever and always...

Everyone else - glass half empty.

It's the same glass.



At least I can back up my beleifs with reasoning.



dallas said:
disolitude said:
dallas said:
babuks said:
I think Google would have been better for Facebook. Surely they called for higher price but their technology is far superior than Bing. Anyhow, I don't think Facebook needs Google like search ability, so Bing is ok.



They can't use google.  Google is a direct competitor to Facebook with their Google+ service, and is closing in on being the #2 social media bc they have the following marketing practices that facebook lacks:

-a google+ tile on ever android smartphone.  People will click on tiles just to try them out, so google+ will grow bc of this

-Google+ threads are listed as part of the google search results for users that are logged into Google.  This will direct non-users into google+ as well as provide users of Google+ a way to search for old threads that they liked.  So, google+ will grow bc of this.

-Integration.  Google+ integrates things like Gmail, youtube (so they can put a youtube video in a google+ thread if they like),  google maps, as well as google play, where people can link to songs, etc

You make me laugh dude.

Google - glass half full! Forever and always...

Everyone else - glass half empty.

It's the same glass.



At least I can back up my beleifs with reasoning.

Not really. 

I don't even know if you have an Android device. Do you use Google for your searches? I don't know... I never see posts from you arguing about features of Android or Google services and why they are better.

With you it's just sales, stock performance, and maket trends. I hardly call those "beliefs".



disolitude said:
dallas said:
disolitude said:
dallas said:
babuks said:
I think Google would have been better for Facebook. Surely they called for higher price but their technology is far superior than Bing. Anyhow, I don't think Facebook needs Google like search ability, so Bing is ok.



They can't use google.  Google is a direct competitor to Facebook with their Google+ service, and is closing in on being the #2 social media bc they have the following marketing practices that facebook lacks:

-a google+ tile on ever android smartphone.  People will click on tiles just to try them out, so google+ will grow bc of this

-Google+ threads are listed as part of the google search results for users that are logged into Google.  This will direct non-users into google+ as well as provide users of Google+ a way to search for old threads that they liked.  So, google+ will grow bc of this.

-Integration.  Google+ integrates things like Gmail, youtube (so they can put a youtube video in a google+ thread if they like),  google maps, as well as google play, where people can link to songs, etc

You make me laugh dude.

Google - glass half full! Forever and always...

Everyone else - glass half empty.

It's the same glass.



At least I can back up my beleifs with reasoning.

Not really. 

I don't even know if you have an Android device. Do you use Google for your searches? I don't know... I never see posts from you arguing about features of Android or Google services and why they are better.

With you it's just sales, stock performance, and maket trends. I hardly call those "beliefs".



I back up my beleifs on the fates of said companies with facts and reasoning about said facts.  I'm not really interested in features or whatever, I can mess with that on my own time and as you've said im pretty much only interested in the business side of things.



Around the Network
dallas said:
disolitude said:
dallas said:
disolitude said:
dallas said:
babuks said:
I think Google would have been better for Facebook. Surely they called for higher price but their technology is far superior than Bing. Anyhow, I don't think Facebook needs Google like search ability, so Bing is ok.



They can't use google.  Google is a direct competitor to Facebook with their Google+ service, and is closing in on being the #2 social media bc they have the following marketing practices that facebook lacks:

-a google+ tile on ever android smartphone.  People will click on tiles just to try them out, so google+ will grow bc of this

-Google+ threads are listed as part of the google search results for users that are logged into Google.  This will direct non-users into google+ as well as provide users of Google+ a way to search for old threads that they liked.  So, google+ will grow bc of this.

-Integration.  Google+ integrates things like Gmail, youtube (so they can put a youtube video in a google+ thread if they like),  google maps, as well as google play, where people can link to songs, etc

You make me laugh dude.

Google - glass half full! Forever and always...

Everyone else - glass half empty.

It's the same glass.



At least I can back up my beleifs with reasoning.

Not really. 

I don't even know if you have an Android device. Do you use Google for your searches? I don't know... I never see posts from you arguing about features of Android or Google services and why they are better.

With you it's just sales, stock performance, and maket trends. I hardly call those "beliefs".



I back up my beleifs on the fates of said companies with facts and reasoning about said facts.  I'm not really interested in features or whatever, I can mess with that on my own time and as you've said im pretty much only interested in the business side of things.

Ok, that's fine. You should really put that in your signature though.

A lot of people here are 20 year olds that really enjoy their Microsoft Xbox, phone or PC/Laptop and really don't give a shit about the business side of things. So essentially when you attack microsoft for their business strategy you come off to these people like you insulting their Microsoft products that they really enjoy using...



disolitude said:
dallas said:
disolitude said:
dallas said:
disolitude said:
dallas said:
babuks said:
I think Google would have been better for Facebook. Surely they called for higher price but their technology is far superior than Bing. Anyhow, I don't think Facebook needs Google like search ability, so Bing is ok.



They can't use google.  Google is a direct competitor to Facebook with their Google+ service, and is closing in on being the #2 social media bc they have the following marketing practices that facebook lacks:

-a google+ tile on ever android smartphone.  People will click on tiles just to try them out, so google+ will grow bc of this

-Google+ threads are listed as part of the google search results for users that are logged into Google.  This will direct non-users into google+ as well as provide users of Google+ a way to search for old threads that they liked.  So, google+ will grow bc of this.

-Integration.  Google+ integrates things like Gmail, youtube (so they can put a youtube video in a google+ thread if they like),  google maps, as well as google play, where people can link to songs, etc

You make me laugh dude.

Google - glass half full! Forever and always...

Everyone else - glass half empty.

It's the same glass.



At least I can back up my beleifs with reasoning.

Not really. 

I don't even know if you have an Android device. Do you use Google for your searches? I don't know... I never see posts from you arguing about features of Android or Google services and why they are better.

With you it's just sales, stock performance, and maket trends. I hardly call those "beliefs".



I back up my beleifs on the fates of said companies with facts and reasoning about said facts.  I'm not really interested in features or whatever, I can mess with that on my own time and as you've said im pretty much only interested in the business side of things.

Ok, that's fine. You should really put that in your signature though.

A lot of people here are 20 year olds that really enjoy their Microsoft Xbox, phone or PC/Laptop and really don't give a shit about the business side of things. So essentially when you attack microsoft for their business strategy you come off to these people like you insulting their Microsoft products that they really enjoy using...

That is in my signiture, I referencced a financial analyst didnt I?  If somebody has more than 2 brain cells then they should be able to read between the lines and show me where i've "insulted" anything, please.



Dallas comes in random msft thread: Mfst is bad blaahblah google is bad blahblah. You are getting pretty annoying with your nonstophate try yoga or something.



maximrace said:
Dallas comes in random msft thread: Mfst is bad blaahblah google is bad blahblah. You are getting pretty annoying with your nonstophate try yoga or something.

I'm just upset that I got banned for referencing the CEO of Valve who said that Windows 8 sucks.  A bunch of MSFT fans complained and got me banned, so i'm going to post some bad news and also make sure that I stay within the rules.  Its going to be this way until the mods chill out and stop banning me for silly reasons.



Maybe you aren't getting banned for one thread but because you come hating in every thread ;)