disolitude said:
dallas said:
disolitude said:
dallas said:
babuks said:
I think Google would have been better for Facebook. Surely they called for higher price but their technology is far superior than Bing. Anyhow, I don't think Facebook needs Google like search ability, so Bing is ok. |
They can't use google. Google is a direct competitor to Facebook with their Google+ service, and is closing in on being the #2 social media bc they have the following marketing practices that facebook lacks:
-a google+ tile on ever android smartphone. People will click on tiles just to try them out, so google+ will grow bc of this
-Google+ threads are listed as part of the google search results for users that are logged into Google. This will direct non-users into google+ as well as provide users of Google+ a way to search for old threads that they liked. So, google+ will grow bc of this.
-Integration. Google+ integrates things like Gmail, youtube (so they can put a youtube video in a google+ thread if they like), google maps, as well as google play, where people can link to songs, etc
|
You make me laugh dude.
Google - glass half full! Forever and always...
Everyone else - glass half empty.
It's the same glass.
|
At least I can back up my beleifs with reasoning.
|
Not really.
I don't even know if you have an Android device. Do you use Google for your searches? I don't know... I never see posts from you arguing about features of Android or Google services and why they are better.
With you it's just sales, stock performance, and maket trends. I hardly call those "beliefs".
|
I back up my beleifs on the fates of said companies with facts and reasoning about said facts. I'm not really interested in features or whatever, I can mess with that on my own time and as you've said im pretty much only interested in the business side of things.
