By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dallas said:
disolitude said:
dallas said:
babuks said:
I think Google would have been better for Facebook. Surely they called for higher price but their technology is far superior than Bing. Anyhow, I don't think Facebook needs Google like search ability, so Bing is ok.



They can't use google.  Google is a direct competitor to Facebook with their Google+ service, and is closing in on being the #2 social media bc they have the following marketing practices that facebook lacks:

-a google+ tile on ever android smartphone.  People will click on tiles just to try them out, so google+ will grow bc of this

-Google+ threads are listed as part of the google search results for users that are logged into Google.  This will direct non-users into google+ as well as provide users of Google+ a way to search for old threads that they liked.  So, google+ will grow bc of this.

-Integration.  Google+ integrates things like Gmail, youtube (so they can put a youtube video in a google+ thread if they like),  google maps, as well as google play, where people can link to songs, etc

You make me laugh dude.

Google - glass half full! Forever and always...

Everyone else - glass half empty.

It's the same glass.



At least I can back up my beleifs with reasoning.

Not really. 

I don't even know if you have an Android device. Do you use Google for your searches? I don't know... I never see posts from you arguing about features of Android or Google services and why they are better.

With you it's just sales, stock performance, and maket trends. I hardly call those "beliefs".