| chapset said: Nintendo will be doing the same after this gen and the disaster waiting for them with the wii U |
What does Nintendo have to do with Sony selling one of its building?
| chapset said: Nintendo will be doing the same after this gen and the disaster waiting for them with the wii U |
What does Nintendo have to do with Sony selling one of its building?
| Roma said: I have balls u can use they even come with a stick attached to them. you just move it around a bit and white stuff cums out that will tell you the future of anything! |
I was waiting for a clever response. It never came :/

Roma said:
I have balls u can use they even come with a stick attached to them. you just move it around a bit and white stuff cums out that will tell you the future of anything! |
reported, for sexual harassement

![]()
Bet reminder: I bet with Tboned51 that Splatoon won't reach the 1 million shipped mark by the end of 2015. I win if he loses and I lose if I lost.
There on track 2 make a profit, right there is the only part of that article that is important.
This appears good news all around. I don't like Sony, but I don't want to see them go broke either as competition pushes everyone forward. Glad to see they are starting to make some of the hard but necessary decisions at Sony to turn things around.
Nsanity said:
What does Nintendo have to do with Sony selling one of its building? |
It's called the "reverse kowenicki rule". While the original rule allows a user to bring up Sony's financial situation when discussing anything about Microsoft, Nintendo, Sega, Nokia, Krispy Kreme, Sharp, Panasonic, Apple, Samsung, Activision, EA, Best Buy, Amazon, Taco Bell, or Pet Smart, the reverse allows for the, uh, reverse of that. Not to be confused with the Freebird rule or the Doom rule.

| gigaSheik said: Easier to sell buildings than Vitas... |
LMFAO
Yay!!!
| pokoko said: I know people are going to make a big deal about this, but isn't this kind of logical? They're cutting thousands of jobs, especially in the TV division, doesn't it make sense that they would need less space? I would think property consolidation would be an expected aspect of employee downsizing. |
"they would need less space"<-- LOL.. oic and being financially in trouble has nothing to do with it hey.. SDF till the end aye .. not long to go!
Moderated,
-Mr Khan
BluGamer23 said:
"they would need less space"<-- LOL .. SDF till the end aye! .. not long to go! |
What are you talking about? So ... you -don't- think having thousands less employees would require less space? Seriously? You're saying that they should keep property levels the same? That's doesn't even ... I mean, what? Unless I'm misunderstanding you somehow--I hope so. Please, explain how that isn't a logical step.

pokoko said:
What are you talking about? So ... you -don't- think having thousands less employees would require less space? Seriously? You're saying that they should keep property levels the same? That's doesn't even ... I mean, what? Unless I'm misunderstanding you somehow--I hope so. Please, explain how that isn't a logical step. |
Okay, the 10.000 people are in factories. This is an office-building. And Sony sold it to rent it back. They just needed the cash and this was the easiest way to get it even though they need to pay more for it.
Imagine not having GamePass on your console...