By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Are you Democrat or Republican?? Take the Quiz.

Lol, took the political compass test and im pretty much smack dab in the middle.
Left/right = .12
Libertarian/authoritarian = -.05



Around the Network
sc94597 said:

Just took the test, I'm more conservative than most Republicans. 

93% Republican 25% Democratic

the2real4mafol said:

This test is flawed, what if you are left of democrat or right of republican?

I tried the first test from quizfarm and i'm very surprised. I sided with democrats at 59% but apparently i also side with 54% of Republicans. WTF?

You'd likely be a moderate then. Neither a liberal democrat nor a conservative republican. You'd choose a party based on the important policies of the time. It's not really surprising either, most people in the U.S (at least) are moderates or align better with a third party on most issues (except many issues aren't contested.)

I'm far more left wing than that, well thats at least what i though anyway.

I just tried Political compass and it agrees with me

And got to quiz said I was 11% republican and 86% democrat. I guess that first test was just bad



Xbox One, PS4 and Switch (+ Many Retro Consoles)

'When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called the people's stick'- Mikhail Bakunin

Prediction: Switch will sell better than Wii U Lifetime Sales by Jan 1st 2018

i'm surprised at the little difference between Obama and Romney, that is actually little difference according to the chart



Xbox One, PS4 and Switch (+ Many Retro Consoles)

'When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called the people's stick'- Mikhail Bakunin

Prediction: Switch will sell better than Wii U Lifetime Sales by Jan 1st 2018

79% republican and 13% democrat. Some of these questions, i just dont know how there is 2 answers possible. An illegal citizen DOES NOT DESERVE SS, why? Because they dont pay taxes mother fucker!



Michael-5 said:

I think no handguns => less murders, like in Japan or Korea. A rifle does everything a handgun does fine, it protects your house, can be used for hunting, and can fit in an average American car no problem, it's already portable enough. You don't need to take a gun with you into Wal-Mart because you have your reasons.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasty_generalization



Around the Network
the2real4mafol said:

 

i'm surprised at the little difference between Obama and Romney, that is actually little difference according to the chart

 


Like I said, most topics are restricted in American (and European) politics. Hence they tend to remain in the Authoritarian Right. The U.S doesn't have a true left, and even Obama isn't socialist he's just trying to appease the poor with a welfare-state (which isn't anywhere near socialism.) Most normal people (non politicians) on the otherhand, don't even approach the Authoritarian Right. 



sc94597 said:
Michael-5 said:

I think no handguns => less murders, like in Japan or Korea. A rifle does everything a handgun does fine, it protects your house, can be used for hunting, and can fit in an average American car no problem, it's already portable enough. You don't need to take a gun with you into Wal-Mart because you have your reasons.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasty_generalization

LOL, I'm just saying there is no need for Handguns. Whatever someones reason is to own a handgun, it's less important then potentially a human life. It might not make a difference in the USA, but it would probably cut 30/100 homicides a year out in Toronto, and that's just swell.

I also said "I think" It's opinion.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

cloud1161 said:

http://quizfarm.com/quizzes/politics/politicalsciencedr/are-you-a-republican-or-democrat/  take this quiz to see if you are really belong to the party you say you do.  Your results may surprise you.  Please post the results and state whether or not they agreed with what you call yourself.

For instance, I actually called myself on the border or the two parties but found out I am 75% Republican and 29% Democrat.  Not sure why the total percent adds to 104 though.

Here is another one http://www.gotoquiz.com/republican_or_democrat_1

I scored 86% Republican and 38% Democrat.

 

 

UGH.  It seems like yet again people have chosen to nitpick the shit out of a post.  People, it is just  a damn survey.  Get over yourselves.

 

OK I took the political compass test and here are the results.

 

So I am closer to neutral according to this.  

Here is the link for others to test :  http://www.politicalcompass.org/test

The last quiz I would say is the most accurate (described me a Libertarian Anarchist / with sligh left leaning economic tendencies.) 



-- Nothing is nicer than seeing your PS3 on an HDTV through an HDMI cable for the first time.

Michael-5 said:
sc94597 said:
Michael-5 said:

I think no handguns => less murders, like in Japan or Korea. A rifle does everything a handgun does fine, it protects your house, can be used for hunting, and can fit in an average American car no problem, it's already portable enough. You don't need to take a gun with you into Wal-Mart because you have your reasons.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasty_generalization

LOL, I'm just saying there is no need for Handguns. Whatever someones reason is to own a handgun, it's less important then potentially a human life. It might not make a difference in the USA, but it would probably cut 30/100 homicides a year out in Toronto, and that's just swell.

I also said "I think" It's opinion.

In that case, Toronto is yours to do with how you wish and my land how I (and my fellow people) wish.  In the United States a handgun ban would devastate the elderly (who can't hold rifles or shotgun for whichever reason) and the weak (who would be harmed by the recoil.)  These are the most vulnerable people to criminals. Furthermore, concealed carry deters criminals. Hence, I would not support any type of gun prohibition in Pennsylvania, as there is no significant data that verifies a correlation between homicides and gun prohibition for all contexts. Nicely, my state legislators and representatives agree, as do the majority of fellow Pennsylvanians. As for gun control, as long as it's reasonable and effective, it's welcomed otherwise why waste one's time, tax dollars, and privacy on it? 



Michael-5 said:
sc94597 said:
Michael-5 said:

I think no handguns => less murders, like in Japan or Korea. A rifle does everything a handgun does fine, it protects your house, can be used for hunting, and can fit in an average American car no problem, it's already portable enough. You don't need to take a gun with you into Wal-Mart because you have your reasons.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasty_generalization

LOL, I'm just saying there is no need for Handguns. Whatever someones reason is to own a handgun, it's less important then potentially a human life. It might not make a difference in the USA, but it would probably cut 30/100 homicides a year out in Toronto, and that's just swell.

I also said "I think" It's opinion.

I think you need to research the impact of prohibition in American Culture then revist your assumption. Taking away a service or good that is desired by the people will result in far more insidious group of people creating a market for that service or good which ensures that only non-law biding citizens will seek out said service or good. You'd probably see a rise in violent hand gun crimes as a result of the people that would buy and sell them, much like alcohol, drugs, and prostitution. 

There are many other sociological reasons for violent crimes in society that are a result of the direction we have progressed as a culture, but we will never examine them because it requires that we take responsiblity for society rather than government doing so.



-- Nothing is nicer than seeing your PS3 on an HDTV through an HDMI cable for the first time.