By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - The Ps3 will FINALLY pass the xbox360 at some point,so what,s the big deal?it,s only 2013

sales2099 on 04 January 2013
man-bear-pig said:
It won't catch the 360 next year either. 2014 is when it'll happen.

Pretty unbelievable how Sony went from having 75% marketshare to being in last place for the entire duration of the gen.

Apparantly that isn't politically correct for certain PS3 fans :P

We should say from now on "Pretty unbelievable how Sony went from having 75% marketshare to being in last place for the part of the generation that matters"



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

Around the Network
cookingyourmama on 04 January 2013
sales2099 said:
cookingyourmama said:
sales2099 said:
dsgrue3 said:

I think the difference here is that MS fans are comparing Sony's success of PS2 generation to PS3 generation. Indeed when they are compared, Sony has lost quite a bit.

However, if we only compare based upon PS3 generation, moving into 2nd place is definitely a noteworthy figure.

Your analogies about the race being over are completely absurd and devoid of any logic. This is basically the Wii gasping for breath during an endurance race with no finish line, and the PS3 gaining on 360 with each step while both move swiftly toward the Wii.

Your banned but ill respond to this anyway.

Its not exactly the race being over....its the people not caring that the race is continuing in one years time.

And as proven by the amount of replies and also people posting in this thread, people still care about how many are sold and who finishes above who so your point is moot.

Well I guarantee this bears 0 significance to Nintendo fans, PS3 fans seem to REALLY care, and 360 fans are merely trying to downplay it (and rightfully so IMO).

You do realize that internet commentators are but a vocal minority in the generall mass of Wii/PS3/360. If anything it only proves the vocal minority PS3 fanatics care.

Nope not at all, the reality is a vocal minority of 360 fans are desperately trying to play down the PS3 overtaking the 360 because they can't take the fact their console of choice is going to end up finishing last and on top of that they were so sure for many years that the 360 was going to end up 'beating' the ps3 which makes the ps3 finishing above the 360 even worse.



sunK1D on 04 January 2013
cookingyourmama said:
sales2099 said:
cookingyourmama said:
sales2099 said:
dsgrue3 said:

I think the difference here is that MS fans are comparing Sony's success of PS2 generation to PS3 generation. Indeed when they are compared, Sony has lost quite a bit.

However, if we only compare based upon PS3 generation, moving into 2nd place is definitely a noteworthy figure.

Your analogies about the race being over are completely absurd and devoid of any logic. This is basically the Wii gasping for breath during an endurance race with no finish line, and the PS3 gaining on 360 with each step while both move swiftly toward the Wii.

Your banned but ill respond to this anyway.

Its not exactly the race being over....its the people not caring that the race is continuing in one years time.

And as proven by the amount of replies and also people posting in this thread, people still care about how many are sold and who finishes above who so your point is moot.

Well I guarantee this bears 0 significance to Nintendo fans, PS3 fans seem to REALLY care, and 360 fans are merely trying to downplay it (and rightfully so IMO).

You do realize that internet commentators are but a vocal minority in the generall mass of Wii/PS3/360. If anything it only proves the vocal minority PS3 fanatics care.

Nope not at all, the reality is a vocal minority of 360 fans are desperately trying to play down the PS3 overtaking the 360 because they can't take the fact their console of choice is going to end up finishing last and on top of that they were so sure for many years that the 360 was going to end up 'beating' the ps3 which makes the ps3 finishing above the 360 even worse.

The playstation brand had an obligation to win this generation given their past success, yet it's in last place. Microsoft is the clear winner(took away significant market share from Sony) and Nintendo is the rightful winner(sales). That makes Sony the loser. Rocked your world there.



cookingyourmama on 04 January 2013
sunK1D said:
cookingyourmama said:
sales2099 said:
cookingyourmama said:
sales2099 said:
dsgrue3 said:

I think the difference here is that MS fans are comparing Sony's success of PS2 generation to PS3 generation. Indeed when they are compared, Sony has lost quite a bit.

However, if we only compare based upon PS3 generation, moving into 2nd place is definitely a noteworthy figure.

Your analogies about the race being over are completely absurd and devoid of any logic. This is basically the Wii gasping for breath during an endurance race with no finish line, and the PS3 gaining on 360 with each step while both move swiftly toward the Wii.

Your banned but ill respond to this anyway.

Its not exactly the race being over....its the people not caring that the race is continuing in one years time.

And as proven by the amount of replies and also people posting in this thread, people still care about how many are sold and who finishes above who so your point is moot.

Well I guarantee this bears 0 significance to Nintendo fans, PS3 fans seem to REALLY care, and 360 fans are merely trying to downplay it (and rightfully so IMO).

You do realize that internet commentators are but a vocal minority in the generall mass of Wii/PS3/360. If anything it only proves the vocal minority PS3 fanatics care.

Nope not at all, the reality is a vocal minority of 360 fans are desperately trying to play down the PS3 overtaking the 360 because they can't take the fact their console of choice is going to end up finishing last and on top of that they were so sure for many years that the 360 was going to end up 'beating' the ps3 which makes the ps3 finishing above the 360 even worse.

The playstation brand had an obligation to win this generation given their past success, yet it's in last place. Microsoft is the clear winner(took away significant market share from Sony) and Nintendo is the rightful winner(sales). That makes Sony the loser. Rocked your world there.

Hhhmmm i wonder whos alt. account this could be....... hhhmmmmm *rollseyes*

NO console has ever managed to win 3 generations in a row so nope their is no "obligation". You can try and spin all you want to but it's going to end up Nintendo>Sony>Microsoft wether you like it or not.



sunK1D on 04 January 2013
cookingyourmama said:
sunK1D said:
cookingyourmama said:
sales2099 said:
cookingyourmama said:
sales2099 said:
dsgrue3 said:

I think the difference here is that MS fans are comparing Sony's success of PS2 generation to PS3 generation. Indeed when they are compared, Sony has lost quite a bit.

However, if we only compare based upon PS3 generation, moving into 2nd place is definitely a noteworthy figure.

Your analogies about the race being over are completely absurd and devoid of any logic. This is basically the Wii gasping for breath during an endurance race with no finish line, and the PS3 gaining on 360 with each step while both move swiftly toward the Wii.

Your banned but ill respond to this anyway.

Its not exactly the race being over....its the people not caring that the race is continuing in one years time.

And as proven by the amount of replies and also people posting in this thread, people still care about how many are sold and who finishes above who so your point is moot.

Well I guarantee this bears 0 significance to Nintendo fans, PS3 fans seem to REALLY care, and 360 fans are merely trying to downplay it (and rightfully so IMO).

You do realize that internet commentators are but a vocal minority in the generall mass of Wii/PS3/360. If anything it only proves the vocal minority PS3 fanatics care.

Nope not at all, the reality is a vocal minority of 360 fans are desperately trying to play down the PS3 overtaking the 360 because they can't take the fact their console of choice is going to end up finishing last and on top of that they were so sure for many years that the 360 was going to end up 'beating' the ps3 which makes the ps3 finishing above the 360 even worse.

The playstation brand had an obligation to win this generation given their past success, yet it's in last place. Microsoft is the clear winner(took away significant market share from Sony) and Nintendo is the rightful winner(sales). That makes Sony the loser. Rocked your world there.

Hhhmmm i wonder whos alt. account this could be....... hhhmmmmm *rollseyes*

NO console has ever managed to win 3 generations in a row so nope their is no "obligation". You can try and spin all you want to but it's going to end up Nintendo>Sony>Microsoft wether you like it or not.


blah blah blah is all you got. MS third or not won't change the fact Sony is still the loser this gen all things considered.



Around the Network
cookingyourmama on 04 January 2013
sunK1D said:
cookingyourmama said:
sunK1D said:
cookingyourmama said:
sales2099 said:
cookingyourmama said:
sales2099 said:
dsgrue3 said:

I think the difference here is that MS fans are comparing Sony's success of PS2 generation to PS3 generation. Indeed when they are compared, Sony has lost quite a bit.

However, if we only compare based upon PS3 generation, moving into 2nd place is definitely a noteworthy figure.

Your analogies about the race being over are completely absurd and devoid of any logic. This is basically the Wii gasping for breath during an endurance race with no finish line, and the PS3 gaining on 360 with each step while both move swiftly toward the Wii.

Your banned but ill respond to this anyway.

Its not exactly the race being over....its the people not caring that the race is continuing in one years time.

And as proven by the amount of replies and also people posting in this thread, people still care about how many are sold and who finishes above who so your point is moot.

Well I guarantee this bears 0 significance to Nintendo fans, PS3 fans seem to REALLY care, and 360 fans are merely trying to downplay it (and rightfully so IMO).

You do realize that internet commentators are but a vocal minority in the generall mass of Wii/PS3/360. If anything it only proves the vocal minority PS3 fanatics care.

Nope not at all, the reality is a vocal minority of 360 fans are desperately trying to play down the PS3 overtaking the 360 because they can't take the fact their console of choice is going to end up finishing last and on top of that they were so sure for many years that the 360 was going to end up 'beating' the ps3 which makes the ps3 finishing above the 360 even worse.

The playstation brand had an obligation to win this generation given their past success, yet it's in last place. Microsoft is the clear winner(took away significant market share from Sony) and Nintendo is the rightful winner(sales). That makes Sony the loser. Rocked your world there.

Hhhmmm i wonder whos alt. account this could be....... hhhmmmmm *rollseyes*

NO console has ever managed to win 3 generations in a row so nope their is no "obligation". You can try and spin all you want to but it's going to end up Nintendo>Sony>Microsoft wether you like it or not.


blah blah blah is all you got. MS third or not won't change the fact Sony is still the loser this gen all things considered.

Nope not all in the slightest, what i've said is a FACT, all you have is biased opinions.



sunK1D on 04 January 2013
cookingyourmama said:
sunK1D said:
cookingyourmama said:
sunK1D said:
cookingyourmama said:
sales2099 said:
cookingyourmama said:
sales2099 said:
dsgrue3 said:

I think the difference here is that MS fans are comparing Sony's success of PS2 generation to PS3 generation. Indeed when they are compared, Sony has lost quite a bit.

However, if we only compare based upon PS3 generation, moving into 2nd place is definitely a noteworthy figure.

Your analogies about the race being over are completely absurd and devoid of any logic. This is basically the Wii gasping for breath during an endurance race with no finish line, and the PS3 gaining on 360 with each step while both move swiftly toward the Wii.

Your banned but ill respond to this anyway.

Its not exactly the race being over....its the people not caring that the race is continuing in one years time.

And as proven by the amount of replies and also people posting in this thread, people still care about how many are sold and who finishes above who so your point is moot.

Well I guarantee this bears 0 significance to Nintendo fans, PS3 fans seem to REALLY care, and 360 fans are merely trying to downplay it (and rightfully so IMO).

You do realize that internet commentators are but a vocal minority in the generall mass of Wii/PS3/360. If anything it only proves the vocal minority PS3 fanatics care.

Nope not at all, the reality is a vocal minority of 360 fans are desperately trying to play down the PS3 overtaking the 360 because they can't take the fact their console of choice is going to end up finishing last and on top of that they were so sure for many years that the 360 was going to end up 'beating' the ps3 which makes the ps3 finishing above the 360 even worse.

The playstation brand had an obligation to win this generation given their past success, yet it's in last place. Microsoft is the clear winner(took away significant market share from Sony) and Nintendo is the rightful winner(sales). That makes Sony the loser. Rocked your world there.

Hhhmmm i wonder whos alt. account this could be....... hhhmmmmm *rollseyes*

NO console has ever managed to win 3 generations in a row so nope their is no "obligation". You can try and spin all you want to but it's going to end up Nintendo>Sony>Microsoft wether you like it or not.


blah blah blah is all you got. MS third or not won't change the fact Sony is still the loser this gen all things considered.

Nope not all in the slightest, what i've said is a FACT, all you have is biased opinions.

Blah blah blah coming out of your mouth again.



cookingyourmama on 04 January 2013
sunK1D said:
cookingyourmama said:
sunK1D said:
cookingyourmama said:
sunK1D said:
cookingyourmama said:
sales2099 said:
cookingyourmama said:
sales2099 said:
dsgrue3 said:

I think the difference here is that MS fans are comparing Sony's success of PS2 generation to PS3 generation. Indeed when they are compared, Sony has lost quite a bit.

However, if we only compare based upon PS3 generation, moving into 2nd place is definitely a noteworthy figure.

Your analogies about the race being over are completely absurd and devoid of any logic. This is basically the Wii gasping for breath during an endurance race with no finish line, and the PS3 gaining on 360 with each step while both move swiftly toward the Wii.

Your banned but ill respond to this anyway.

Its not exactly the race being over....its the people not caring that the race is continuing in one years time.

And as proven by the amount of replies and also people posting in this thread, people still care about how many are sold and who finishes above who so your point is moot.

Well I guarantee this bears 0 significance to Nintendo fans, PS3 fans seem to REALLY care, and 360 fans are merely trying to downplay it (and rightfully so IMO).

You do realize that internet commentators are but a vocal minority in the generall mass of Wii/PS3/360. If anything it only proves the vocal minority PS3 fanatics care.

Nope not at all, the reality is a vocal minority of 360 fans are desperately trying to play down the PS3 overtaking the 360 because they can't take the fact their console of choice is going to end up finishing last and on top of that they were so sure for many years that the 360 was going to end up 'beating' the ps3 which makes the ps3 finishing above the 360 even worse.

The playstation brand had an obligation to win this generation given their past success, yet it's in last place. Microsoft is the clear winner(took away significant market share from Sony) and Nintendo is the rightful winner(sales). That makes Sony the loser. Rocked your world there.

Hhhmmm i wonder whos alt. account this could be....... hhhmmmmm *rollseyes*

NO console has ever managed to win 3 generations in a row so nope their is no "obligation". You can try and spin all you want to but it's going to end up Nintendo>Sony>Microsoft wether you like it or not.


blah blah blah is all you got. MS third or not won't change the fact Sony is still the loser this gen all things considered.

Nope not all in the slightest, what i've said is a FACT, all you have is biased opinions.

Blah blah blah coming out of your mouth again.

Nope.



SWORDFISH_84 on 04 January 2013

When did this happen!!!
In your dreams maybe...



PsicloneX on 04 January 2013

Nope not at all, the reality is a vocal minority of 360 fans are desperately trying to play down the PS3 overtaking the 360 because they can't take the fact their console of choice is going to end up finishing last and on top of that they were so sure for many years that the 360 was going to end up 'beating' the ps3 which makes the ps3 finishing above the 360 even worse.

This quote right here is just not right.i am a 360 fan and i always knew the ps3 would eventually overtake the 360 in the end but no-one knew/expected it to take this longgggggggg,so in reality when it does overtake the 360 it won,t be such of a bang like when you pop a balloon but more like when you let the air slowly out.
just my opinion.



Don,t be Fanboys,Be Gamefans,Play games 4ever...GAME ON(msn)