Random atheist website is taken as fact now? Oh dear. Nothing more need be said.

Sure, fallacy fallacy, let's agree on that and move the  hell on. you logic was incomplete, I called you out on it because you were pretending to be the hocus pocus of logic and that you were able to prove that human homosexuality is natural using logic. I showed that the premise was missing, and I stand by the idea that it is very arguable.

Though you may have a point that you were trying to claim that it is natural, I stand by my criticism of your logic as factual.

When you're at the point where you're refuting the sources given to you that agree with your worldview, you know there's a serious issue.

Regardless, in english, and in life, and in logic, a conclusion is based on a set of premises.

Bo-bye.

Tell me how atheism relates to the authority on logic? Haha, utter nonsense.

I speak from experience in regard to logic. It's a fundamental aspect of my degree.

Fair point in regard to his claim/premise, which was actually that  "Humans display homosexuality". I will concede that, it took entirely too long for either of us to address that.

Doesn't change your strawman, though. His position wasn't "All animals including humans are the same" or whatever you said. 

what is the criticism though?
is it of the word natural?
ok, would you substitute the word typical, then?
It is typical of human species, that gays should exiat.

I think you are just very hesitant to use the word natural. Am i right?

Brilliant picture. I actually got banned from IGN for pointing out that the majority of people who were arguing with me in a thread were just using the fallacy of false cause. The moderators are obviously Hardee's material over there rather then Harvard. 

No prof, I am not hesitant to use anything, I'm just evaluating your logic.

Natural is the ok term, I'm just saying that the premise "that all animals are alike" is faulty. Some species do things that others do not.

And by "the", for those who suffer from reading comprehension paralysis, I mean the one premise that "all animals are alike", above and beyond the premises already present in the logic.

Don't bother aeguing with him - the guy specialises in ignoring the other person and creating his own rules for debate.

I've come to such a realization, haha. I'm just hoping one day he realizes that he has absolutely no idea what he's talking about. Manifests his own premises onto other's as if it's implied? haha, sheer nonsense. 

Some people can't admit when they're wrong, despite direct evidence to the contrary. It's a character flaw.

Those fallacies are committed on vgchartz all the time and the people doing it never realize they are doing it.