| theprof00 said:
what spevial pleadinh? how am i moving the goalposts? i was saying that humans having gay populations was natural. It is a fact that we have gay populations, and that all animals have gay population. I only mis-explained it later when i was sayimg humans are animals and animals are gay. You're right though, my first premise was different , it changed when i was trying to explain to you logically how it makes sense and ended up with a conclusion that didn't follow from the premise, but here you are a victim of fallacy fallacy, because it does actually follow that it is natural for humans to be gay since it is proven that all animals(includong humans) ahave gay populations. that was my original point, as you seem to agree. You just chose to ignore this. "just because something was argued incorrectly fdoesn't mean it is wrong" |
Sure, fallacy fallacy, let's agree on that and move the hell on. you logic was incomplete, I called you out on it because you were pretending to be the hocus pocus of logic and that you were able to prove that human homosexuality is natural using logic. I showed that the premise was missing, and I stand by the idea that it is very arguable.
Though you may have a point that you were trying to claim that it is natural, I stand by my criticism of your logic as factual.
