It really is a very objective, well-constructed article. I couldn't argue with the listed positive or negatives. This is a good read for anyone on the fence.
"Sony has only been in the games business for three console cycles yet the Vita feels like it was crafted by the most experienced hardware designers in the world. This is the PlayStation manufacturer's greatest work yet."
I couldn't agree with that line more. The Vita is by far the best gaming hardware I've ever owned. I was almost shocked by how much I like the console itself; I really wasn't expecting that. It's an actual delight to hold and fiddle around with.
The article gives the Vita low marks for its browser and certain secondary online functions, though I'll just have to take its word for that, as I haven' tried out any of that and really have no interest in using the Vita to check facebook or twitter. It definitely does need more productivity apps, however. That's really something I'd like to see more of.
As far as I can see, the biggest negative the Vita has is the cost of the memory cards. That's the part that feels lame. I won't even quibble with the cost of the console itself, I think it's worth that, but the added on cost is extremely prohibitive. Old PSP titles need to be dropped in price, as well, though I don't know if that's Sony's call or not.
I also agree with the article that the Vita has both quality and quantity when it comes to games. People who say has it has little to offer in that regard are flat-out wrong. Add in PS+, which is almost a necessity for a Vita owner, and there is plenty to play.