Alara317 said: That's one of the problems this thread was meant to address: The fact that religion gets handled with kids gloves. If anyone else was making the same nonsensical claims and were being as dense as some of the people in this thread regarding any other topic, they'd be laughed off the board. But since it's religion, and religion is sacred, it's okay to use faulty arguments since they've been in existence for the better part of a millenium. It's not about your responses not being to my liking, some responses despite disagreeing with my point have been agreeable and mature. Criticising science and evolution and the credibility of the group of most intelligent people on earth is not something that should be tolerated. That's flaming a group (of scientists), which is no worse than me flaming a group (of religious people). I'm also noticing a huge problem with the mods responding negatively to semantics. I can call you ignorant as long as I back it up with explanations as to WHY you're ignorant, but if I use the words stupid, moronic, imbecillic, or any other variation indicating you're less than intelligent, I will get banned, even if you had an IQ of 75 and my claims were entirely true. Now, I'm not saying this about you, but some people in this thread certainly have shown an aggressive dedication to willful ignorance, and I can't think of any way to describe them other than 'flat out stupid'. Not becuase they don't agree with me, but because they can't grasp the simplest ideas regarding logic and rationale. Believe it or not, there is such a thing as a stupid person, modern culture has led us to believe everyone is special; this is a falsehood, not everyone is special. I'll probably be banned for this, based on what I've seen. |
Even if true, calling somone ignorant, stupid, etc isn't really going to get you anywhere...its just not fruitful to discussion. My advice would be, if you truly think someone fits that description and you can't discuss the topic without calling them those names, just don't respond to them. If you really want to debate a point, just leave the name-calling out and focus on the issue. You're actually more likely to get a civil discussion that way.....maybe not change their view but at least enlighten them.
As far as discussing religion,, I wouldn't call it "kid's gloves". The problem is that you're discussing something that is very important to people. The problem is that there's not really another comparable issue in which so many people have strong views. Politics is probably the closest, and believe me, you have to be incredibly careful when discussing politics. For example, I could go on a rant criticizing the FDA and drug-testing trials, but most people could probably care less, even if I unfairly criticized it, because they just do not care enough about the issue. Final word......the age old saying, "know your auidence" is probably the best advice when discussing any issue, religion or otherwise.