By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - What Occupy movement understood and most don't.

leatherhat on 12 December 2012
badgenome said:
EdHieron said:

I'd really like to see you prove that all as you're doing is throwing out worthless and brainwashed Rightist taling points in the face of real evidence, but guess what, it's not important.  Your side lost.  And from now on it's always going to be that way.  So, do you know what DX  (HHH and Sean Michaels) used to say to do?  That's what you need to do.

LMFAO. What are you, 12?

Because your lord and savior Obama beat that stiff Romney, you automatically win all arguments from here on out even though you have no idea what the hell you're talking about?


You lost dude get over it.



ǝןdɯıs ʇı dǝǝʞ oʇ ǝʞıן ı ʍouʞ noʎ 

Ask me about being an elitist jerk

Time for hype

Around the Network
badgenome on 12 December 2012
leatherhat said:

You lost dude get over it.

I know, man. My guy wasn't even on the ballot. I had to write him in. I super lost.



Mazty on 12 December 2012
dsgrue3 said:
Mazty said:

I used those memes because I can't take this debate seriously. I don't think you grasp the level of education I've had on this subject. Then, for someone who has had none to try and argue what I've heard first hand from professors and read for myself is frankly laughable. 
Your following comment proves just what I mean:

"Our contribution is about 0.3% to the greenhouse effect in regard to CO2. In other words, negligible."

You know this to be a negliable amount how?  You don't. You have literally come to a completely arbitrary conclusion. You also clearly didn't read the paper. C13 means we can, and have, measured human impact on the atmospheric compostition. That was originally a point up for debate, but due to said evidence, it no longer is. We have changed the atmosphere. Fact. 
This is what I mean...You make references to a time when oxygen was incredibly low as if it has some relevance. Having to drag you through a high school and colledge education is not my job:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geological_history_of_oxygen
You hadn't heard of some of the most important ice cores in the global warming debate, and yet feel you are adequately equipped to discuss this topic?

Please, just stop talking. You literally do not know what you are talking about. Where exactly have you been educated on global warming? And why on earth do you think you are educated in the matter enough that you can just dismiss what peer reviewed acclaimed scientists discover?

You seem rather flustered. Showcases your lack of formal debate skills.

Again, you fail to provide a single credible source for you statements and continue to use ad hominem and straw man arguments instead. Bravo.

Haven't addressed a single point of mine, either. Very impressive.

Also, learn to spell college. It contains no "d". Strikingly obvious you have no argument or source, merely another shill for climate change mindlessly providing nothing of substance and instead attacking me instead of addressing evidence.

Again, the ice cores pertain to climate change, not anthropogenic climate change. Thus, irrelevant.

So again I ask,  for the last time. Do you have evidence of anthropogenic climate change or no?


Flustered? Lol no I just know when someone is talking balls. You can claim I don't know how to debate but you're the one who clearly doesn't have the appropriate knowledge on the topic you're talking about.

How were the sources I provided not credible? Work sourced by peer reviewed articles = best proof possible. Bravo. 

I addressed every point of yours. Comparing the CO2 levels during the Cambrian period to the Holocene makes no sense. 12.5% O2 vs 20%. 

Because being pedantic over spelling clearly shows your argument to be invaluable. 
You didn't read the paper. It clearly shows that humans have increased the CO2 level, otherwise how else did Carbon 13 end up in the atmosphere? Magic? 

I have evidence but you simply refused to read it. 



leatherhat on 12 December 2012
badgenome said:
leatherhat said:

You lost dude get over it.

I know, man. My guy wasn't even on the ballot. I had to write him in. I super lost.


Mine too, and as we all know this was the last election they were gonna have. 



ǝןdɯıs ʇı dǝǝʞ oʇ ǝʞıן ı ʍouʞ noʎ 

Ask me about being an elitist jerk

Time for hype

badgenome on 12 December 2012
leatherhat said:

Mine too, and as we all know this was the last election they were gonna have. 

Crazy right wingers and crazy left wingers (but I repeat myself) agree: Obama is going to declare martial law and become president for life.



Around the Network
leatherhat on 12 December 2012
badgenome said:
leatherhat said:

Mine too, and as we all know this was the last election they were gonna have. 

Crazy right wingers and crazy left wingers (but I repeat myself) agree: Obama is going to declare martial law and become president for life.


And the world will know peace 



ǝןdɯıs ʇı dǝǝʞ oʇ ǝʞıן ı ʍouʞ noʎ 

Ask me about being an elitist jerk

Time for hype

spaceguy on 12 December 2012
badgenome said:
EdHieron said:


I hit the page and this is the first thing I see. LOL  WTF......



EdHieron on 12 December 2012
badgenome said:
EdHieron said:

I'd really like to see you prove that all as you're doing is throwing out worthless and brainwashed Rightist taling points in the face of real evidence, but guess what, it's not important.  Your side lost.  And from now on it's always going to be that way.  So, do you know what DX  (HHH and Sean Michaels) used to say to do?  That's what you need to do.

LMFAO. What are you, 12?

Because your lord and savior Obama beat that stiff Romney, you automatically win all arguments from here on out even though you have no idea what the hell you're talking about?


I know perfectly well what I'm talking about.  Christianity is the greatest force for evil the world has ever seen.  Mitt Romney is a member of a very secretive and dangerous cult.  And if you Right Wing Christ, Money, and Ayn Rand cultists can't beat a black man with a name like Barack Hussein Obama after four years of the vilest smear campaign in the history of American poliics ( or at least since the McCarthy era), how do you really hope to get things to go your way in the future?

~Mod Edit~

This post has been moderated.

-Smeags



mrstickball on 12 December 2012
EdHieron said:
mrstickball said:

 

Hitler and the SS murdered approximately 40% of all Christian pastors and preists of churches during World War 2. One of Germany's greatest tactics was to murder all Christian leaders when they occupied a new nation. Anyone that disagreed with the Nazi regime were promptly killed.

Deitrich Boehnhoffer is a prime example of that.

 

 

 

Here is a list of the people that the Nazis are said to be most responsible for killing.

"The Nazi's killed over 11 million Jews, 'gypsies', disabled, Poles, Soviet civilians, homosexuals, Communists. If you add in the 3.3 million Soviet prisoners of war killed in German camps the total is much higher."
(http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_people_did_the_Nazis_kill)

Do you see mass numbers of Christians being singled out?

Also, the only country where Christians were singled out to be in Nazi concentration camps was Poland.  And the vast majority of Christians that the Nazis were considered to be responsible for killing were killed not because of their Christianity but because they were enemy combatants ( http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110829171617AAc6Dxf ).


So just because he didn't single them out means they were a Christian theocracy?

Go do some research on World War 2 and actual accounts of ministers and civilians during German occupations. They butchered a lot of Christian ministers simply for being Christian. Just because your numbers doesn't single them out doesn't mean they weren't targeted.



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.

spaceguy on 12 December 2012
EdHieron said:
badgenome said:
EdHieron said:

I'd really like to see you prove that all as you're doing is throwing out worthless and brainwashed Rightist taling points in the face of real evidence, but guess what, it's not important.  Your side lost.  And from now on it's always going to be that way.  So, do you know what DX  (HHH and Sean Michaels) used to say to do?  That's what you need to do.

LMFAO. What are you, 12?

Because your lord and savior Obama beat that stiff Romney, you automatically win all arguments from here on out even though you have no idea what the hell you're talking about?


I know perfectly well what I'm talking about.  Christianity is the greatest force for evil the world has ever seen.  Mitt Romney is a member of a very secretive and dangerous cult.  And if you Right Wing Christ, Money, and Ayn Rand cultists can't beat a black man with a name like Barack Hussein Obama after four years of the vilest smear campaign in the history of American poliics ( or at least since the McCarthy era), how do you really hope to get things to go your way in the future?

He does have a good point. The house had 500,000 votes more for democrates and the only reason republicans won the house was because of jury mandering by the republcans. Thats why you seen the senate gain seats. They where expected to lose seats. This was a big upset by the republicans. They should have had this in the bag and they didn't.

The majority of the republican party is old and dieing off.People under 30 are overwhelmingly progressive. In the years to come the U.S. will move fast to the left and to progressive values and that also mean removing the corporate democrates.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/08/house-candidates-votes_n_2096978.html