Anti-US? O_o That's new. You just having grudge against me for whatever I did to you. Don't be, if I was mean, I'm sorry :D

It's My Lai, just a tip of the iceberg of your atrocities in Veitnam. They don't teach you that in school? Shame.

My points are:
- Posting pictures in attempt to get emotional reactions instead of arguments is wrong.
- Atrocities do happen more or less often  regardless, especially in war conflicts. But the essential difference between, say, you, despite how common said atrocities might be (like in Vietnam), how desperately an army command is trying to conceal these facts, how laughable court decisions in regard to people who committed war crimes could be etc., and Nazis or Brits - is the latter ones did happen to put into practice a policy of purposeful genocide and other various mistreatment, which were planned and approved by high-ranked authorities (well, more or less, there're some questionable decisions I could think of, like bombings of certain German cities and nuclear bombings of Japan during WW2).

//Though honestly all of you, imperialists, do have one thing in common throughout the history - so called white man guilt - and in all seriosness I find it strange to discuss things like who killed less untermenschen, as if it makes the winner of such a contest morally superior.

Anti-US? O_o That's new. You just having grudge against me for whatever I did to you. Don't be, if I was mean, I'm sorry :D

It's My Lai, just a tip of the iceberg of your atrocities in Veitnam. They don't teach you that in school? Shame.

My points are:
- Posting pictures in attempt to get emotional reactions instead of arguments is wrong.
- Atrocities do happen more or less often  regardless, especially in war conflicts. But the essential difference between, say, you, despite how common said atrocities might be (like in Vietnam), how desperately an army command is trying to conceal these facts, how laughable court decisions in regard to people who committed war crimes could be etc., and Nazis or Brits - is the latter ones did happen to put into practice a policy of purposeful genocide and other various mistreatment, which were planned and approved by high-ranked authorities (well, more or less, there're some questionable decisions I could think of, like bombings of certain German cities and nuclear bombings of Japan during WW2).

//Though honestly all of you, imperialists, do have one thing in common throughout the history - so called white man guilt - and in all seriosness I find it strange to discuss things like who killed less untermenschen, as if it makes the winner of such a contest morally superior.

Griffin said:

You should not bring up the nuclear bombings of Japan, since they saved more lives then they killed.

Thank you, I'm perfectly aware of what official historiography thinks about it, and consider this a typical "common place" that everybody think it is, while it's not (e.g. Napoleon was short). I beleive if not due to the nuclear deterrence there could have been other nuclear bombings, which would be postfactum and hypocritically explained somehow as a good thing. Anyway the subject was discussed already here, on VGC.

@MrBubbles, who would have thought? Well, that was my assumption. Probably, Canadian, as if it makes a lot of difference for me :D

Just throw an H-bomb there to wipe everything and then, rebuild everything from 0.

did you even look at the pictures i posted? and you still want to call them nazis?  

well in that case i apologize.  i did not realize you were mentally deficient when i first spoke so harshly to you.  i would never treat someone like you in such a way. 

So your proposing the American government commit genocide? 

Again, you resort to insults during a discussion. If you don't agree with someone's views, that's about the most childish way to show so. And those pictures, I think, I've a thousand times before. No need to keep recycling them in order to reinforce your emotionally fuelled arguements. They simply do NOT work.