theprof00 said: @trucks Allow me to explain. Firts mistake: you saying that ff took a risk in saying for certain that it was not in his pm. We do not know what info a potential mafia may have access to. Null tell. Second mistake: you implying that mario did not make a concrete stance. Mario, by virtue of writing "in the op" as opposed to "in the pm" virtually acknowledges that the ecplanation is not in the pm, otherwise he would have said so. Mario does not want to be in trouble over a trick so abstained from saying pm. Yet again we ont and shouldnt know what info mafia has access to. The two cases are identical, both null tells. Third mistake: the real person to question here is zero who parroted the words "in the op"; this comes off as zero trying to be careful. Yet you make no mention of zero. And then suddenly, after all this talk about "in the op", you actually find an explanation of the map in the op within a very short time frame. This is all extremely suspect. |
1st "mistake": What I'm saying is that there is a scenario where a scum Final-Fan could have gotten in trouble for saying that. I'm not saying Mafia has or doesn't have info, I'm saying it's a possibility that they don't and if that's the case then scum taking a stance about Mario's statement would be a risk (not a huge one but a risk nonetheless).
2nd "mistake": You read way too much into things. Mario saying in the OP instead of PM is just a mistake on his part, he even commented about it here: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4874100
3rd mistake: You might actually have a point about zero repeating OP instead of PM but to me it's outweighed by the rest of his post where he seems like he is genuinely wondering why he didn't get an explanation.
Signature goes here!