By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Mass Effect Trilogy being released on PS3 Dec. 4

Just what the title says. No mention of when ME1 will be ready for DL, but we can assume same day. it will cost 15 dollars. 

On a personal note, was going to get the set day 1 for PS3 (or PC possibly) but all versions are kinda gimped with missing DLC. For instance NONE of them will have ME3 DLC. PC and 360 versions are missing just about all ME2 DLC. 360 version has no DLC for ME1, and so on. IGN has a complete list of what is where: http://www.ign.com/wikis/mass-effect-trilogy

With this in mind, im seriously considering just rebuying ME2 and getting the other two seperate. I'll compare prices later. 

oh and 360/PC version will be out in 5 days



Around the Network

Damn it, for me it's the other way around. The only version I own is ME2 which already includes all the DLC.

I feel ripped off.

But on the other hand. How important is DLC really? Not very important. For Dragon Age Origins I played most of the DLC but they all were weak (except for Awakening). And for Dragon Age II I didn't play any of the DLC.



More importantly, the ME1 on the PS3 version, is it really not included on the disc?

That's a huge problem for me as my HDD is already packed. I hate downloads.

EDIT: seems I'm safe. It's on the Blue ray disc. I misunderstood the OP.



sounds like waiting for the ultimate trilogy



“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”

- George Orwell, ‘1984’

Slimebeast said:
Damn it, for me it's the other way around. The only version I own is ME2 which already includes all the DLC.

I feel ripped off.

But on the other hand. How important is DLC really? Not very important. For Dragon Age Origins I played most of the DLC but they all were weak (except for Awakening). And for Dragon Age II I didn't play any of the DLC.

If you already have the ME2 DLC then you'd only need to buy the ME1 and ME3 DLC. That said, I should have known EA would pull this crap. I can understand leaving the DLC out of ME3, but their is no excuse for ME1 and ME2 not to include all the DLC.



Around the Network
Darc Requiem said:
Slimebeast said:
Damn it, for me it's the other way around. The only version I own is ME2 which already includes all the DLC.

I feel ripped off.

But on the other hand. How important is DLC really? Not very important. For Dragon Age Origins I played most of the DLC but they all were weak (except for Awakening). And for Dragon Age II I didn't play any of the DLC.

If you already have the ME2 DLC then you'd you only need to buy the ME1 and ME3 DLC. That said, I should have know EA would plus this crap. I can understand leaving the DLC out of ME3, but their is no excuse for ME1 and ME2 not to include all the DLC.

yeah its a bunch of BS, the PS3 ME1 comes with one of them. But its all crap. I bought all DLC for ME2, but I dont know