By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - 2nd debate, who won? Obama or Romney?

 

Who won the 2nd debate?

President Barack Obama 299 57.72%
 
Governor MItt Romney 149 28.76%
 
Nobody/tie 70 13.51%
 
Total:518
gergroy on 16 October 2012
Kasz216 said:
chapset said:
in before blaming the media for Romney defeat tonight

Worth noting...  "In before" posts are against forum rules.


I did not know that, but I also would never do that... :)



Around the Network
killerzX on 16 October 2012
Izo said:
killerzX said:
the_dengle said:
killerzX said:


exactly so you agree with me. he didnt call it an act of terror. he said acts of terror wont shake our resolve" soo, he just saying acts of terror wont shake us. he wasnt calling the bengazi thing a terrorist attack.

You are being ridiculous. Why would he suddenly bring up acts of terror if he did not consider the attack itself an act of terror? It would be a total non sequitur. Like talking about the embassy attack and suddenly saying, "and the deer population in the tristate area is completely out of control." You expect us to believe that he simply felt like making a point about acts of terror even though he didn't think the situation had anything to do with terror? Stop being dumb. You can dislike Obama as much as you want, but at least be honest with yourself about the words coming out of the guy's mouth.

read my post with his entire speech. it answers your questions. and makes more sense than your claim. you claim doesnt make sense because the days after this speech he denyed it being an act of terror. he blamed the video.

It does not matter, the other side wont care. They know Romney was trying to peg him on the fact that he blamed a video. All that matters is that the point he was making (which was correct) will be swept under the rug because the moderator stopped the point he was making. I cannot wait untill after the electon.

that was another point of mine, its not her job to do "fact checking" shes a moderator.



killerzX on 16 October 2012
theprof00 said:
Are you not going to respond to what I said killerx?

what did you say?



Max King of the Wild on 16 October 2012

I think the problem with Obamas speech is that even if he believed that it was a demonstration it is still considered an "act of terror." I think he used it in this sense. I don't think when he said "acts of terror" he was meaning it in the sense that we would relate to a terrorist attack... if this makes any sense



theprof00 on 16 October 2012
killerzX said:
theprof00 said:
Are you not going to respond to what I said killerx?

what did you say?
theprof00 said:
killerzX said:


me, a republican?

What?

I didn't say crazy republican. I said crazy republicans all think the worst" soo, I was just saying Republicans hate Obama. I wasn't calling you a crazy republican.


Maybe it just went over your head.



Around the Network
gergroy on 16 October 2012
drkohler said:
Wow... did I just hear Wolf Blitzer saying:
"There are about 8% more republicans in this poll than in our usual poll"
while CNN showed Obama 46% vs Romney 39% winning the debate in the background.
Then Blitzer's conclusion was "So this is basically a draw!".
Is this guy mathematically challenged or just stupid?


well, it is a scientific poll of DEBATE WATCHERS.  People that watch debates are not going to have the same demographics as a typical registered voter demographic.  For the intents of the poll, there is nothing wrong here.  It is just that greater percentage of republicans watch the debates.  Since old people skew republican, it isn't that hard to get...



killerzX on 16 October 2012
theprof00 said:
killerzX said:
theprof00 said:
Are you not going to respond to what I said killerx?

what did you say?
theprof00 said:
killerzX said:


me, a republican?

What?

I didn't say crazy republican. I said crazy republicans all think the worst" soo, I was just saying Republicans hate Obama. I wasn't calling you a crazy republican.


Maybe it just went over your head.


oh. i didnt think it was something that needed a reponse. of course republicans dotn like obama. You call them crazy. i disagree with that.

and im glad you arent calling me a crazy republican.



chocoloco on 16 October 2012
kitler53 said:

so i just wanted to post how impressively worked up my wife is on the "binders full of women" statement.  she posted this to her facebook...





gergroy on 16 October 2012
Max King of the Wild said:
I think the problem with Obamas speech is that even if he believed that it was a demonstration it is still considered an "act of terror." I think he used it in this sense. I don't think when he said "acts of terror" he was meaning it in the sense that we would relate to a terrorist attack... if this makes any sense


I think in Obama's mind, it was a demonstration that turned into a spontaneous act of terror.  As such, he didn't really think of it as a terrorist attack, but still an act of terror.  If that makes sense...



killerzX on 16 October 2012

Oh here's something BIg. Candy Crowly just admitted she was WRONG. in correcting Romney. She admitted that.

I know accept your apologies.