Izo said:
killerzX said:
the_dengle said:
killerzX said:
exactly so you agree with me. he didnt call it an act of terror. he said acts of terror wont shake our resolve" soo, he just saying acts of terror wont shake us. he wasnt calling the bengazi thing a terrorist attack.
|
You are being ridiculous. Why would he suddenly bring up acts of terror if he did not consider the attack itself an act of terror? It would be a total non sequitur. Like talking about the embassy attack and suddenly saying, "and the deer population in the tristate area is completely out of control." You expect us to believe that he simply felt like making a point about acts of terror even though he didn't think the situation had anything to do with terror? Stop being dumb. You can dislike Obama as much as you want, but at least be honest with yourself about the words coming out of the guy's mouth.
|
read my post with his entire speech. it answers your questions. and makes more sense than your claim. you claim doesnt make sense because the days after this speech he denyed it being an act of terror. he blamed the video.
|
It does not matter, the other side wont care. They know Romney was trying to peg him on the fact that he blamed a video. All that matters is that the point he was making (which was correct) will be swept under the rug because the moderator stopped the point he was making. I cannot wait untill after the electon.
|
that was another point of mine, its not her job to do "fact checking" shes a moderator.