sales2099 said:
Aldro said:
sales2099 said:
Aldro said:
sales2099 said:
Aldro said:
Seriously? Sales?
So Wii Sports and Call of Duty are the greatest phenomenons due to sales?
How the hell is this still going on after all these years. Yes, when you love a franchise, you want it to sell well just as much as any fan of a game or company will lick their ass. Im a pro in this regard. But sales by no means says anything about the game if not showing a good marketing campaign. Unless we manage to filter out the word of mouth based upon the sales lmao.
Now if you analyze the games and share your opinion, well then atleast it is rather more personal hence people giving shit about reviews, but hopefully its reviewers who shares similar taste to themselves and not for example Bob from Welikegames who gives every game a 3/10 and only writes a score without any motivation (yes I just made that up).
Wake up fellas. Halo 4 would sell better but that does not make it the better game. The fact that you have to resort to these manners clearly shows a sheer desperation. Albeit one can argue that I show something similar as I am writing this. I choose however to believe that I am doing this because one decent person will see this and go "Fair enough" / "Good point" and thus fullfilling the purpose of a forum -> To share my thoughts.
|
Ive always operated under the one-two punch mentality: sales and meta. When I priase a game for its sales, chances are the meta is very respectable. Every mainline Halo is 90+ anyway so I fail to see your point. Its AAA in quality and sales. Wii Sports is 70's meta and COD is high 80's meta, rendering those examples refutable.
|
So Modern Warfare 2 having 94 Meta has it just as good as Halo 3 and since sold better => IS the better game?
Wow.
|
Halo mainline entries have 90+ quality and sell several millions. It can stand up to any PS3 exclusive like the LO
|
Would you not say that a game above 5 Million in sales is considerd selling "well" and in the end also boils down to own opinion? My point isnt that Halo sells well and is well recieved, my point is that the sales doesnt tell you ANYTHING regarding its quality.
|
If you fully read my last post I said that sales has nothing to do with quality. It is about winner and loser (when compared to another game), what gamers want, the line between running your mouth off on a forum and actually practicing what you preach.
Im sorry if you associated sales with quality because I sure dont.
|
"Im sorry if you associated sales with quality because I sure dont."
Thank you, that's all I was getting at.
I added a thing above, namely:
"Comparing Last of Us and Halo is ridiculous but as I said before Halo will have a ton of content while Last of Us will be played once and be done with"
How is it ridicilous when you don't even know the MP aspect of TLOU?
What says quantity of the content in Halo equals the quality in TLOU?
Yes we've been through this and we know Halo will be a quality title. But how delusional can you be to believe that TLOU doesnt stand a chance because of the wording "content" and "content" alone?
Perhaps TLOU will revolutionize gaming for all we know.
WE CANNOT POSSIBLY KNOW BECAUSE WE HAVE YET TO PLAY THE GAME.
Vice versa applies to Halo 4 albeit we've seen glimpses of that atleast and the game has leaked.
