Jay520 said:
I don't think limp wrists and lisps should be grouped the same as the way you dress. In some cases, limp wrists and lisps aren't a result of learned behavior. For example, difficulty speaking can be the result of a disorder in a person's motor cortex, that regulates voluntary muscles (which could occur because of head trauma or they could simply be born that way). In that case, it could simply be due to the physical state of a person's brain. I don't think people develop limp wrists or lisps as a result of what they experience. I have no way of knowing though. As for the second bolded statement, there's probably a lot of truth to that statement. But, it's a two-way street. There's an input (external stimuli), and the brain processes that stimuli. Both the brain and the external are ultimately the sole factors in how a person thinks/acts. Where you and I probably differ is the fact that I don't believe most people's brain function differs in any major way. In any case though, I don't think we can prove whether brain function or external stimuli is the bigger factor (it probably varies from person to person anyway). I personally doubt that people are born predisposed to specific tendencies, at least in any major way, but that's just my own opinion. |
I guess I should have specified it as the "Gay lisp" and "Gay limp wrist", as in social demeanor and not one that is obviously caused by some defect.
As for the second Paragraph: You could look at it either way. We are actually a lot more alike than we like to believe...because social structures pride us on being individuals yet conforming to the norm. Labels are the problem. Men and Women, where guys have testicles women have ovaries, where women have boobs men have a chest(and are actually capable of secreting milk if their hormones dictate it). We are one and the same with suttle differences. It is no wonder that homaphrodites exist. And knowing that they do I find it easily to believe that a person can have the mind of a woman and the body of a man(transexuals) and that a person can have an array of varying sexuality.
Outward stimuli also can influence our eating habits but It will never go dictate our genetic desire to eat when hungry. I've learned that someone's sexual preference is a constant, never seems to change. If it directly be dictated by outward forces people could actually be "Ex-Gay". But all of my study has proven that apparently once you go gay(at whatever degree they are), you never go back...and I can't believe something that isn't genetic yet influenced would be that way. This is not to be confused with someone's actual level of sexual preference of being more bisexual in nature and going back and forth between the two. That is not quitting gaydom and becoming straight, that is you like both and freely choose between the two. To believe otherwise is to say with enough conditioning therapy one can be switched to either or and I don't believe that is true for me or anyone else.
The fact that 2 kids born in the same home, raised the same way and still one is hetero, the other homo. Or the fact that some areas of the world are so blatantly hostile to gays that they are threatened with tortures and death such as anal gluing(they inject a paste up the anus that hardens and makes it impossible to deficate without tearing your anus inside out which leads to a slow and excruciating death) yet STILL homosexuality prevails as a supposed "sub/con choice". If anything that would force someone to subconsciously surpress those feelings. Yet sexual desires are almost uncontrollable in that aspect. We like what we like sexually(as far as him or her) and that never seems to change.


![]()
Greatness Awaits
PSN:Forevercloud (looking for Soul Sacrifice Partners!!!)









