| spurgeonryan said:
|
You can say the same thing about Coke, which only has seen slight ingredient changes throughout the years. There is nothing wrong about that either :P
| spurgeonryan said:
|
You can say the same thing about Coke, which only has seen slight ingredient changes throughout the years. There is nothing wrong about that either :P
Yearly releases should be way cheaper, like 40$
people paying 60$ every year for a roster update, or a new 5h campaign is insane and stupid
No I dont see anything wrong with it. If its what people want then why not give it to them. People pass judgement with their wallets.
spurgeonryan said:
True. I still buy coke too! Great example.
They changed it once and it was horrible. Pepso also made clear pepsi before, but they decided that it was not working.
EA is doing good right now so they must know what they are doing. |
Give it a month.
spurgeonryan said:
|
Haha, no, not really, but they can always go lower!
As long as a "sequel" doesn't only offer additional maps it's not wrong to do the same over and over. I don't know about all sports games but the soccer games really change (at least every two years). They try to do better but sometimes fail, that's how life goes.
If they don't come up with new things they could easily go the DLC way, though. New maps, new/updated teams or whatever every year when the core game is stable and fun. People should just be careful and not blindly buy everything. When it's a rip-off the companies kind of deserve to suffer from bad sales so they do better next time and don't treat their customers like sheep.
only the man with the gun forcing you to buy it every year is wrong...







Face the future.. Gamecenter ID: nikkom_nl (oh no he didn't!!)
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
