Hah, like when I wrote up a huge post against GoW and posted it right after day started... when GoW had died that night.

Yes it certainly is retarded to make such a point at people who aren't online. However, you were.

my post: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4796648

your post:(in another thread) http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4796651

And we all know how crazy you are about your forum buddy.

But you asked for my suspects. As I said before the night came to an end, anyone not making a choice between the two lynch candidates looks suspect to me. I named FF and Tabaha and then. Offhand, I can't remember anything FF has brought to the game other than trying to push a few people to vote. No town reads nor any scum reads. Nothing that anyone can look back on to compare or contrast with opinions down the line. Tabaha is more a product of replacing in for a Kantor that I didn't feel good about due to lack of participation.(I recall thinking he was mostly a lurker in my GoT round where he was scum) Post-lynch, his reasoning for voting zero isn't good, but I'm not going to blame him for something I asked for. And it could easily be attributed to a newb unsure of what to do. He should definitely be pressed night 2 though.

Re-reading the end of night one though, DT stands out the most to me. First he said "I think we are making a mistake voting no lynch." here and soonafter, once the votes settled, he said "This is going to be a painful night. 2 lynch kills, mafia kill, maybe a vigilante kill, maybe a serial killer kill. " here. The night kills are inconsequential, because they should be expected no matter what. If he were a townie, he's saying we should have a lynch and his vote was on mario so he shouldn't have considered him town. He did say he did not believe zero was scum, but lynching one scum with a town isn't exactly painful. And even if he considered it as such, he could have voted no lynch to save zero. So that line suggests he already knew zero and mario weren't a part of his faction, and he just wanted to seem like a concerned townie.

And yes spurge, I don't care that you've claimed to have a role.(which if you do, you are probably completely in the wrong in what you're trying to do with it. Why don't you claim treestump again and cry about it) When you are around with ~1 hour left and there's a tie between 2 players and you don't make a choice, it says that you're perfectly fine with both of them being lynched. And given the flips, that looks very bad for you.

Erm, this is the kind of thing you should handle through PM reminders.

Impressive votal re-read and analysis. I'm equally impressed between this and prof's analysof Hat's play.

You wouldn't reveal such mistakes if you were scum, even to win townie points, as it would put a fellow scum in danger.

You and prof are now my two top town reads. 

A little more than 4 hours left until I start night again.

you know, 4 hours left is always four hours left, no matter if GMT, MESZ, EDT, JST or something else

Sorry I haven't been on for what feels like an age.

Went to tge football last night (my team WON :D) and Ive not been able to get onto vgc until I cleared my cache...

I'm aware how ironic it is that the one time I move away from a hammer, it results in two town being lynched

Ive noticed youve said this 3-4 times now. About Mead.

Is there any reason for this?

This post is justifying why you are off track with your accusations of me. As i said, I think we are making a mistake voting no lynch, because  we needed a lynch to get some information, be it to find a scum, or as simple as just help cracking the DRM. By voting no-lynch, the information we would have got would have been the one that the Mafia would have given us, rather then what we as  a collected town wanted to find out. At the time I -along with many others- were very suspcious about Mario because he was playing badly etc. I did not consider him town, and rather then no-lynch I wanted Mario lynched. That's why I said we are making a mistake with no lynch. 

 However I considered Zero to be almost certainly Town. He went against Mario's point about his role, and it was likely that he was Cop or Doctor because of this, as i thought Mario was mafia and fakeclaiming. I did not want Zero to be lynched because of this. Lynching one scum and a town power role cop/doctor in my eyes Is painful, because it could quite easily be just Mario. If I had removed my vote from Mario and voted no-lynch then Mario would have been saved -i thought he was scum- and voting no lynch would have still got just Zero lynched or it would have been no-lynch. Which I have already justified is a bad idea. 

So no. As I was stuck between either getting Zero lynched and Zero and Mario lynched, it was going to be a painful night.

If you want someone to be suspicious of look at Radish. He unvoted Zero and didn't vote anyone else, creating the whole situation. As a serial killer he would want as many people to be killed as possible. On top of that, whether he is Vigilante or Serial Killer, he has stated several times he does not know who he is going to vote for, and is just blind firing, which is likely to kill another town, as there are more towns then 3rd party and Mafia combined.