By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - How do you feel about the performance of the VGChartz mod team?

 

How is the VGChartz mod team doing?

It's doing a great job. 299 32.97%
 
It's doing okay. 143 15.77%
 
It's not doing well. 432 47.63%
 
Total:874
Carl2291 said:

It doesnt matter if people agreed with pezus being moderated or not. It wouldnt matter if you had 100 people who disagree with his moderation.  It doesnt matter what user or group of users disagrees with a moderation. It isnt a democracyIts never been a democracy.

And there you go!  Pointless to talk to you guys.  Your minds are well made up before hand.  Im so done with this thread.  Great spokesmanship for the community




       

Around the Network
JayWood2010 said:

If you dont know what im talking about then you shouldnt even reply. Just makes the comment bloated. And you all can defend that pezus ban ovr and over again. That isnt going to get any more people to agree with you. The community clearly spoke up about this when it happened to which you all ignored. As i said Mods > Users

I may not know the entire story with what happened to pezus and everybody else who left but you carl was a key factor on that choice, and i do know that as a fact.  So to say the mods arent pushing people away, in your words, is rubbish.  It has happened, and it continues to happen.  Hell ive wanted to leav this site because of you guys.  Seece has recently disappeared because of you guys for an example, as well as other things

Let's take this from a different angle because we're getting nowhere right now. 

What is the lesson you wanted the mods to take from the pezus incident? What is it that you wanted corrected?

- Do you feel that posting informal warnings when moderation is being discussed in an unrelated thread is not the way to go?
- Do you disagree with moderating someone who wilfully disobeyed a mod warning?



Signature goes here!

JayWood2010 said:
Carl2291 said:

It doesnt matter if people agreed with pezus being moderated or not. It wouldnt matter if you had 100 people who disagree with his moderation.  It doesnt matter what user or group of users disagrees with a moderation. It isnt a democracyIts never been a democracy.

And there you go!  Pointless to talk to you guys.  Your minds are well made up before hand.  Im so done with this thread.  Great spokesmanship for the community


Do you know what a democracy is? There is no voting here. You dont group together to decide who does and doesnt get banned. You dont group together to argue against a ban, expecting it to be overturned *just because* a group of people disagree with it.

You hold no power this way. No specific number of people hold power. What you DO have is the power to form an actual argument for your case.

Tell us HOW we are wrong on a moderation. Tell us HOW you think we can improve the rule set. Tell us WHY you think pezus shouldnt have been banned. Dont just stroll in here expecting to hold any kind of power or sway because a handfull of people agree with something you say.

You need to actually start forming proper arguments rather than expecting things to be done because "people" disagree with certain actions. My God.

Edit - Here you go, the post I was just looking for - http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6002146 - It isnt a democracy. You accept it or you put forward a proper, well thought out argument for why you want something overturned or changed. Debate it. Dont expect something to be done just because a group of people disagree.



                            

JayWood2010 said:

If you dont know what im talking about then you shouldnt even reply. Just makes the comment bloated. And you all can defend that pezus ban ovr and over again. That isnt going to get any more people to agree with you. The community clearly spoke up about this when it happened to which you all ignored. As i said Mods > Users

I may not know the entire story with what happened to pezus and everybody else who left but you carl was a key factor on that choice, and i do know that as a fact.  So to say the mods arent pushing people away, in your words, is rubbish.  It has happened, and it continues to happen.  Hell ive wanted to leav this site because of you guys.  Seece has recently disappeared because of you guys for an example, as well as other things

What? Seece is still around.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Carl2291 said:
JayWood2010 said:

You need to actually start forming proper arguments rather than expecting things to be done because "people" disagree with certain actions. My God.


People already made an argument, specially with pezus in this very thread. My God.  

ANd numbers has always been one of the greatest arguments in the world.  




       

Around the Network
Carl2291 said:
JayWood2010 said:
Carl2291 said:

It doesnt matter if people agreed with pezus being moderated or not. It wouldnt matter if you had 100 people who disagree with his moderation.  It doesnt matter what user or group of users disagrees with a moderation. It isnt a democracyIts never been a democracy.

And there you go!  Pointless to talk to you guys.  Your minds are well made up before hand.  Im so done with this thread.  Great spokesmanship for the community


Do you know what a democracy is? There is no voting here. You dont group together to decide who does and doesnt get banned. You dont group together to argue against a ban, expecting it to be overturned *just because* a group of people disagree with it.

You hold no power this way. No specific number of people hold power. What you DO have is the power to form an actual argument for your case.

Tell us HOW we are wrong on a moderation. Tell us HOW you think we can improve the rule set. Tell us WHY you think pezus shouldnt have been banned. Dont just stroll in here expecting to hold any kind of power or sway because a handfull of people agree with something you say.

You need to actually start forming proper arguments rather than expecting things to be done because "people" disagree with certain actions. My God.

To be fair, it's a democracy inasmuch as any voluntary congregation is a democracy: if leadership (like at a church or a club or a website like this one) starts acting inappropriately, folks will vote by diminishing their participation or leaving outright. That is the implicit check against abuses of power on our end.

The degree to which it's correct for jaywood to invoke that in this context, now, is a bit more questionable. Aside from the Vizioneck migration (where the losses were less than originally estimated) we haven't had more than the same outflow of users that's been going on for the past 4 years or so, with the same study influx of newbies, some who stay on.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Mr Khan said:

To be fair, it's a democracy inasmuch as any voluntary congregation is a democracy: if leadership (like at a church or a club or a website like this one) starts acting inappropriately, folks will vote by diminishing their participation or leaving outright. That is the implicit check against abuses of power on our end.

The degree to which it's correct for jaywood to invoke that in this context, now, is a bit more questionable. Aside from the Vizioneck migration (where the losses were less than originally estimated) we haven't had more than the same outflow of users that's been going on for the past 4 years or so, with the same study influx of newbies, some who stay on.


Oh, certainly. Im not arguing against that. Every user has the right to leave at any time if they feel that the "leadership" is acting inappropriately to send a message (Though the Vizioneck case wasnt solely down to problems with the "leadership" here). The point Im making is that when arguing a case against a moderation, there isnt a vote. There isnt action because a number of people think it was wrong. Its never been that way. There has to be a suitable argument that isnt "X number of people think it was a bad moderation".

JayWood2010 said:

People already made an argument, specially with pezus in this very thread. My God.

ANd numbers has always been one of the greatest arguments in the world.  


Tell us your argument.

Tell us why you think pezus shouldnt have been moderated for directly ignoring the warning in the post he quoted, telling him to move moderation talk away from that thread and into the designated areas (This thread, pm, etc.).

We have been very patient in this matter but now it's time to state it plainly, what made pezus' ban unjustified? How should similar situations be handled?



                            

Woooweee. This thread is on fire again.

Just wanted to say this to motivate the mods a bit after the last few pages!

Keep going mods you guys are doing good work, even though it is not always perceived that way.
Sometimes mistakes are made (it's possible), but from what I've seen it either gets rectified or you guys learn from it. It can even be argued over PM's which is awesome.
It can't be easy trying to do as much as you can in your free time for this website, because damn you guys are actually giving up free time to make sure this community does not get filled with crap. I appreciate it and I am pretty sure a lot of other people do as well!

Also I want more gifs in my sig haha



PSN ID: clemens-nl                                                                                                                

Carl2291 said:

We have been very patient in this matter but now it's time to state it plainly


I can honestly say i get sick of your condescending attitude.

Its simple, he asked a fucking question.  If you guys dont want people to ask questions publicly then dont post it in a thread for people to see publicly, take it to PM. 

In fact it isnt even a rule he cant do that.  So ill post the rules below and you can go ahead and point out the rule that was broken.  Go ahead, ive been waiting patiently here,  but its time for you to state it plainly what rule he actually broke

  1. Moderation on VGChartz. VGChartz uses a progressive moderation system. This means that repeats of the same offense will often result in harsher penalties, starting with a warning and working up. Generally permanent bans are only handed out for extreme rule breaking, a whole lot of repeat offenses of the same rule, or actions that threaten the site’s ability to function. However, the administrators and moderators reserve the right to permanently ban your account at any time if they feel you are a threat to the site. This will only be done through a consensus among the moderating staff. Brand new accounts (less than 200 posts) that do nothing but troll or spam will also be permanently banned immediately, at the discretion of the individual moderator. You are subject to moderation for breaking any of the following forum rules in addition to anything in the Terms of Use.

  2. New Users. Because new users have not yet shown a commitment to civil discourse, moderators will look more harshly upon them (and upon prolific rule-breakers) than established users with relatively clear moderation histories. If you are a long-time member of the site, it is easy to tell the difference between a light-hearted, humorous post, and a genuine piece of flamebait. This distinction is far less clear when you are a new user, so we advise caution.

  3. Thread titles must be work safe, descriptive and on topic. Keep the language in thread titles clean. We don't restrict language usage in posts, but thread titles are a different matter. Whatever luridly foul things you wish to say about Luigi, you can find a work safe euphemism for the title. Also, letter substitution fools nobody, but strings of unpronounceable symbols are acceptable. Now for the descriptive and on topic bit. It's very simple - use the thread title to sum up or describe what you are saying in your post.

    Do not use the title as a deceptive hook to lure people in. Do not post something useless like "How do I..." and put the question in the post. Use a game's full name rather than just an abbreviation of it. Starcraft instead of SC. Star Control 2 instead of SC2. Soul Calibur 3 instead of SC3. SimCity 4 instead of SC4. Abbreviations mean different things to different people, so Be Specific. Also, be careful about using the word "official”. Do not simply declare your thread official by fiat. Threads are only "official" if a moderator says so. In a decision between two threads on the same topic, the thread with the clearest thread title will take priority over the thread with a more obscure topic, even if the latter is posted first.

    Threads should not be aimed at one user (or moderator) in particular, especially not to call them out or insult them. If you want to talk to one user, send them a wall post, or a private message if it is more private.

  4. Avoid thread duplication. As a general rule, moderators allow a good latitude for threads on closely related subjects. However, at a moderator's discretion, threads may be consolidated if they are not sufficiently distinct from other active threads. To help avoid having your thread locked, always review the thread titles on the’ Hot Topics' page of gamrConnect before posting. If you are going to post a subject that is similar to that of an ongoing discussion, take great care to ensure that your thread topic and post body both clearly show how your thread differs from the others out there.

  5. Avatars. All Avatars must be safe for work. This means that they should not be overtly sexual (this includes blatantly sexualised poses), grotesque or graphically violent in nature. As a general guide, ask yourself whether you would see something like that in a PG-rated movie. There are children here, and people who are working, and there is no way for them to hide your obscene avatar. If in doubt, don’t use it. Avatars must not troll or flame (or violate any of the rules laid out for posts, especially 10, 11 and 13). Whether or not an avatar is appropriate is subject to moderator approval. Avatars may be removed by the Lead Moderator (axumblade) or Deputy Lead Moderator (Kantor) if they violate these rules.

  6. Signatures. Signatures must not be excessively long. GIFs contained within signatures must not exceed 1MB. Like avatars, signatures must contain no graphic violence or sexual/NSFW content, and must also be free from flashing lights and other discomfort-inducing GIFs. Quotes in signatures are subject to the approval of the quoted member. You must remove a quote of a member from your signature if they ask you to do so. Every rule applying to posts (especially 10, 11 and 13) also applies to signatures. All content in a signature is subject to moderator approval. Failure to comply with these standards will result in moderator action. Signatures may be removed by the Lead Moderator (axumblade) or Deputy Lead Moderator (Kantor) if they violate these rules.

  7. Work safe content. Some suggestive content is allowed, within limits, but it must be clearly marked before the image appears. Any content of this kind should go in NSFW Discussion. If your topic contains any NSFW material, this should be indicated in the title. If it’s in a post, it needs to be marked, and you must post a link rather than embedding the image unless you are in an appropriately marked thread. We aren’t trying to stop you from having fun, but people of all ages view this site, as well as people at work, so please keep your content appropriate and clearly marked. Pornographic content is never allowed, and the posting of such content will be treated as a very serious offence. All judgments on work safe content will be at the discretion of the moderator. Your avatar must be work safe - see Rule 5.

  8. Substance. Content is king. Threads lacking content can and will be locked. Some tips to keep you and your posts out of trouble:
    • Poster Above You and voting threads require moderator approval. If you do not have it, the thread will be locked, and if you are a repeat offender, you will be moderated. Note that an approved thread may still be locked by the Lead or Deputy Lead Moderator.
    • Do not post just a link. Links have context - expound upon that context. For example, Mario Piano Videos. Post a link, but also give some background on what the link is to. Try to avoid simply copy and pasting the article to which you are linking.
    • Do not post only that Item A sucks, or that Item B is better than Item C. Give reasons why, post links to documented problems, of screenshots, or whatever you can. Similarly, do not reply to other posters with "you're wrong", or worse, “you’re an idiot/troll/fanboy.” Explain why you disagree, and perhaps point to the correct answer.
    • No "In Before The Lock" (IBTL) posts. Repeat offenders will be warned, and disciplinary action will be taken if those warnings are not heeded.
    • No spoilers in threads which are not clearly marked for them in the title. If you are in a non-spoiler thread, mark your spoilers by highlighting the text, selecting the “styles” drop-down menu, and choosing “Spoiler”. Be sensible here. The plot twist in Empire Strikes Back is not a spoiler. The plot twist in BioShock is.
    • Keep posts on topic as much as possible. Threads do sometimes naturally transition into other discussions, but coming in and posting about a completely different topic in order to start arguments is not okay. Stay on topic, and if you have something different to talk about make your own topic.


  9. Spamming. Spam, or multiple short replies in a row without any substance, is not allowed. Explain and justify your opinions. If you have nothing to add to a topic, then go to another topic and post in there instead. Similarly, even if it's well defended, repeating your opinion about a console or game multiple times is also spamming.

  10. Flamebait and trolling. Posts or signatures slamming a particular platform without basis - be it a specific console, macs, windows, or anything similar - will not be tolerated. This applies to specific games as well as consoles.
    • You always have the right to express your opinion, as long as it is relevant to the thread topic, and you do so in a civil manner, justifying what you say. If you want to discuss something other than the thread topic, make your own thread.
    • The forums are here for gamers of all persuasions, so unless you're in a thread specifically geared towards platform comparison/discussion, keep your anti-platform comments out of the thread. Note that there is a difference between having a reasonable argument in the correct thread and trolling.
    • Similarly, do not create threads, posts or signatures just to bait people of a specific fan group. Bait threads will be locked and you will be moderated for them. If you spend a lot of time making hit-and-run negative threads or posts about a specific platform you will also be moderated at the discretion of the moderators.


  11. Website criticism. Do not attack the website without basis. Reasonable debate based on facts is acceptable, but repeated attacks and negative comments about the website and its staff will not be tolerated. People are here to discuss games and sales, and doing nothing but attacking the site is disruptive to those who are trying to participate in a discussion.

  12. Multiple accounts. Creating a new account will result in it being permanently disabled. If you would like to make a new account, let a moderator know so that they can ban the old account. When you are banned you are expected to serve the ban. Repeatedly creating new accounts to dodge a ban will result in the lengthening of the ban and, in extreme circumstances, a permanent ban for all accounts (both present and in the future). Relatives or others sharing the same IP may have separate accounts, but any bans imposed on one may be imposed on the other in order to prevent ban dodging.

  13. Insults and flaming. Attacking other users for any reason is never acceptable.
    • Do not insult someone's religion, race, sex, sexuality, nationality, political beliefs, or gaming preferences. Debate is encouraged, as is civil disagreement, but respect the beliefs and opinions of others.
    • Similarly, do not insult without justification any group of people, be it a religious group, political group, or anything of that sort.
    • Don’t use slurs (gay, f*ggot, n*gger, etc) as insults, even if you’re not using them maliciously.
    • Do not personally insult other users. This includes calling them fanboys or trolls.
    • Report it when another user insults you instead of insulting them back. If they report you and no one reported their post, guess which one of you gets banned? The moderators do not have time to read every post in a thread, so they will often miss things that are not reported.
    • In general try to treat other users with respect and courtesy. We understand debates get heated, but don’t lose yourself in them. Remember you can’t continue the debate if you’re banned, so be respectful to your fellow forum members.


  14. Quality of Language. Make an effort to type in full words and sentences. Put a space after punctuation and capitalise the start of sentences. You’re not writing a text message, and you are not in any hurry. It is very easy to tell the difference between a non-native speaker (who is more than welcome here) and somebody who is simply not making any effort to be coherent. You won’t be moderated for using text speak, but it certainly won’t endear you to other users. Similarly, use paragraphs and line breaks, because nobody wants to read an enormous wall of text.

  15. Do not post links to or requests for copyrighted content. This is pretty well black and white - posting links to, or requests for, copyrighted content can and will get you banned. Copyrighted material includes, but is not limited to: copies of games, ROMs of console games (not including wholly from scratch creations, subject to any licenses said creations may have), and leaked versions of not-yet-released games, even ones that will be freely available in the future. Just because you've got your hot little digital hands on a leaked copy of the Half Life 3 open beta a few years/decades/centuries early, doesn't mean that you can share it here. The same goes for movies, unless they are hosted on a reputable video website. Feel free to defend and discuss piracy in general, but don’t use the forums as a means of sharing pirated content.

  16. Reporting Content. If you think a thread or post needs moderator attention then you can let us know by clicking "report this post" and telling us what the problem is. If things need to go further, send a PM to any of our fine moderators. Naturally, we as moderators do not read every post in every thread, and appreciate a helpful head's up from readers when something untoward is going on. If you have a problem with a moderator, send that moderator a private message, and if you are still dissatisfied, send a private message to axumblade, the Lead Moderator. If you are banned and cannot login, email mods@vgchartz.com with your issue and you will get a response from the Lead Moderator. Do not post these issues in the forums, outside of moderator-sanctioned threads, or on the moderator’s wall - doing so may result in moderation action against you.



       

JayWood2010 said:

I can honestly say i get sick of your condescending attitude.

Its simple, he asked a fucking question.  If you guys dont want people to ask questions publicly then dont post it in a thread for people to see publicly, take it to PM. 

In fact it isnt even a rule he cant do that.  So ill post the rules below and you can go ahead and point out the rule that was broken.  Go ahead, ive been waiting patiently here,  but its time for you to state it plainly what rule he actually broke

-snip-

Did you actually read the rules before you posted them? Look at Rule 16.

"Reporting Content. If you think a thread or post needs moderator attention then you can let us know by clicking "report this post" and telling us what the problem is. If things need to go further, send a PM to any of our fine moderators. Naturally, we as moderators do not read every post in every thread, and appreciate a helpful head's up from readers when something untoward is going on. If you have a problem with a moderator, send that moderator a private message, and if you are still dissatisfied, send a private message to axumblade, the Lead Moderator. If you are banned and cannot login, email mods@vgchartz.com with your issue and you will get a response from the Lead Moderator. Do not post these issues in the forums, outside of moderator-sanctioned threads, or on the moderator’s wall - doing so may result in moderation action against you."

Furthermore...

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=160420&page=1

trasharmdsister12 said:

1. We've been patient and open and have allowed open constructive criticism of the mod team. We feel it was best to give users the opportunity to discuss these things and help us get better. What we've found in recent months is that some have taken this liberty too far and complain and whine about every little thing we do and don't do to the point of simply trying to goad us. From this point on mod criticism in any public form will not be allowed with a few exceptions. We have a dedicated mod performance thread where we've allowed users to come in and reasonably state their case publicly if they feel it sets a new precedent and what not. We have a monthly ban thread where rules of discussion are specifically laid out. These are the ONLY public forums for mod criticism we will allow from now on. Anything in the form of threads, posts, wall posts, wall comments, article comments, game page comments, etc. will no longer be welcome. As always, you are free to PM the mod in question (or one of the other mods) to bring an issue or criticism to light. Public criticism will be moderated. This has always been a rule but now the mod team feel it's time to get strict on this as we've really just had enough with some users' antics. 

Also ask yourself this question before thinking the mod team is out to get you. What do we get from picking on you? Besides angry PMs and public slandering resulting in reduced enjoyment of the site and the occasional mild headache of dealing with these things, what do we receive? If you can come up with a good reason I'd certainly like to hear it. 


And here, to prove that you (and pezus) actually knew about the thread and ruling - http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5358620 - You both posted in it.