AndrewWK said:
|
Yes, for sure. A sequel to Dante's Inferno is confirmed to be in development (so strongly hinted by the developer about one year ago that it was basically a confirmation). The name is just my personal guess though.
AndrewWK said:
|
Yes, for sure. A sequel to Dante's Inferno is confirmed to be in development (so strongly hinted by the developer about one year ago that it was basically a confirmation). The name is just my personal guess though.
| ClassicGamingWizzz said: Dragon age 3 This gamescom is already better than E3 for me ![]() |
dito 
Slimebeast said:
Yes, for sure. A sequel to Dante's Inferno is confirmed to be in development (so strongly hinted by the developer about one year ago that it was basically a confirmation). The name is just my personal guess though. |
I couldn't get past the first level of Dante's Inferno because it felt like a mediocre copycat of God of War. It was a terrible shame because I really wanted to like that game. I bought it even after being massively let down by the demo. I really should try and complete it.
If they are making a sequel, I hope they don't feel inclined to imitate God of War again :/
As for Dragon Age, is it OK to play the second before the first ? Story-wise I mean...
Time between DAo and DA2 was short, this time DA3 is taking a while, making changes probably but will be good to get it. Just hope they remove that stupid dialog wheel.
Hmm, pie.
GodOfWar_3ever said:
I couldn't get past the first level of Dante's Inferno because it felt like a mediocre copycat of God of War. It was a terrible shame because I really wanted to like that game. I bought it even after being massively let down by the demo. I really should try and complete it. If they are making a sequel, I hope they don't feel inclined to imitate God of War again :/ As for Dragon Age, is it OK to play the second before the first ? Story-wise I mean... |
I agree, you should give Dante's Inferno a second chance. It is a blatant copycat of God of War but it's not mediocre by any means, apart from perhaps the graphics. The demo level put me off too, it was a boring level. But the game overall has fantastic atmosphere, feels dark and evil and has a story I loved.
It's certainly okay to play DA2 without having played Origins. It's a great game and the story is completely separate from Origins.
huiii said:
http://live-event.ea.com/gamescom/index.php?q=pk-us so does sony: http://gamescom.eu.playstation.com/ don't know about capcom and ubisoft though.... |
you know when they start according to GMT??
Being in 3rd place never felt so good
zgamer5 said:
|


huiii said:
these are the local times ((germany) i think thats GTM +1) so GTM woul be england right? that would mean its 1 hour earlier for you.
not to sure on that though you might want to convert it yourself to check
Edit: also the sony one s got a coutdoun and the EA one starts 2 hours earlier, it might be easier that way (EA starts in about 10 minutes).
|
thanks! ea almost stared, can't wait.
Being in 3rd place never felt so good
| GodOfWar_3ever said: I couldn't get past the first level of Dante's Inferno because it felt like a mediocre copycat of God of War. It was a terrible shame because I really wanted to like that game. I bought it even after being massively let down by the demo. I really should try and complete it. If they are making a sequel, I hope they don't feel inclined to imitate God of War again :/ As for Dragon Age, is it OK to play the second before the first ? Story-wise I mean... |
You should play Origins first, altough the second has little to do with Origins but still you might get confused sometimes.
@Pezus stop trolling DA 2.... please