| MIA-BUF | 1 |
CIN-KC | 1 |
PHI-WAS | 2 |
JAC-HOU | 2 |
| NYJ-STL | 2 |
CLE-DAL | 2 |
TB-CAR | 1 |
GB-DET | 1 |
| ARI-ATL | 2 |
NO-OAK | 1 |
IND-NE | 2 |
SD-DEN | 2 |
| BAL-PIT | 1 |
DA BEARS | LOSE AGAIN! | CHI-SF | 18-21 |
Who will win the Super Bowl? Part II | |||
| Denver Broncos | 24 | 18.75% | |
| New England Patriots | 14 | 10.94% | |
| Houston Texans | 1 | 0.78% | |
| Baltimore Ravens | 29 | 22.66% | |
| Glasgow Rangers | 3 | 2.34% | |
| Atlanta Falcons | 4 | 3.13% | |
| San Francisco 49ers | 29 | 22.66% | |
| Green Bay Packers | 4 | 3.13% | |
| Seattle Seahawks | 6 | 4.69% | |
| I am a wuss, but I want to see the results. | 12 | 9.38% | |
| Total: | 126 | ||
| MIA-BUF | 1 |
CIN-KC | 1 |
PHI-WAS | 2 |
JAC-HOU | 2 |
| NYJ-STL | 2 |
CLE-DAL | 2 |
TB-CAR | 1 |
GB-DET | 1 |
| ARI-ATL | 2 |
NO-OAK | 1 |
IND-NE | 2 |
SD-DEN | 2 |
| BAL-PIT | 1 |
DA BEARS | LOSE AGAIN! | CHI-SF | 18-21 |
amp316 said:
|
You tell 'em amp, injuries are part of the game. In my opinion, I think the Texans would have won by an even bigger margin if Cutler played the second half,but, who knows.
RolStoppable said:
|
| shak shakarak
|
RolStoppable said:
So-called experts are usually all over teams with high winning records, completely ignoring how these records came to be. Houston and Chicago are good teams, no doubt, but they aren't infallible. Although Houston is definitely a better candidate for the Super Bowl, because the AFC is clearly the weaker conference this season. Also, Chicago is the team in the league that scores the most points on defense by far (meaning they return fumbles and interceptions for touchdowns). If the offense is on their own, the team isn't capable of driving the score up. Much of Chicago's success this season is owed to the defense which either returned turnovers for points or got their offense into good field position through turnovers. |
I actually agree with all of this. The Bears need to get their offense going or they will be in big trouble come playoff time. They are a good team, but you can't consistently beat playoff caliber teams while depending on your defense.
I am going to hold off on my picks for a little while so I can figure out which teams QBs are and aren't playing.
Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD
Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."
"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units." High Voltage CEO - Eric Nofsinger
| MIA-BUF | 2 |
CIN-KC | 1 |
PHI-WAS | 2 |
JAC-HOU | 2 |
| NYJ-STL | 2 |
CLE-DAL | 2 |
TB-CAR | 2 |
GB-DET | 1 |
| ARI-ATL | 2 |
NO-OAK | 1 |
IND-NE | 1 |
SD-DEN | 2 |
| BAL-PIT | 1 |
DA BEARS | LOSE AGAIN! | CHI-SF | 17-10 |
Although, that Chicago prediction is determined on Cutler returning. If he doesn't, then SF will win.
So I was surprised to hear cutler has had 5 concussions since college and is very likely not to play, as concussions get worse the more you have. This is potentially a big lose to the Bears. Still Cutler threw 2 interceptions last game and was slightly out performed by his replacement in both completions and points scored.
I pick Miami this week.
I do not remember a season since the late ninties early 00s were the broncos were easily winning the AFC West. This is a habit that must continue. ![]()

| chocoloco said: So I was surprised to hear cutler has had 5 concussions since college... |
With the Bears' O-line, I'm surprised it's only five.
noname2200 said:
With the Bears' O-line, I'm surprised it's only five. |
Haha... A packers fan ishould not be one to talk of a bad O-line. I think Rodgers had 29 sacks on him, close to number one.
And the most embarrasing self sack of the year!

chocoloco said:
Haha... A packers fan ishould not be one to talk of a bad O-line. I think Rodgers had 29 sacks on him, close to number one.
|
On the contrary, Packers fans are extremely qualified to talk about bad o-lines.