Christie vs Clinton | |||
| Clinton by a landslide | 21 | 45.65% | |
| Clinton squeaks by | 18 | 39.13% | |
| Christie by a landslide | 1 | 2.17% | |
| Christie squeaks by | 6 | 13.04% | |
| Total: | 46 | ||
TadpoleJackson said:
Huckabee was runner up in 2008 ;) |
not really, Romney was still 2nd in the popular vote and he dropped out like a month before Huckabee. Romney also took more states. The only reason Huckabee had six more delegates is he stayed in it longer than romney.
Kantor said:
Christie doesn't look normal-fat though, he looks aristocrat-fat. And that won't go over well. |
what is the difference between normal-fat and aristocrat-fat? is normal fat skinnier?
gergroy said:
what is the difference between normal-fat and aristocrat-fat? is normal fat skinnier? |
A little bit. But the big difference is in facial expression. He doesn't look fat and jovial. He looks fat and miserable.
(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective 
A Hillary Clinton/Elizabeth Warren combo could be deadly.
Bill Richardson is another qualified candidate for the Democratic Party.
On the Republican side, we could see Sarah Palin going after the nomination.
Chris Christie has an appeal problem. His weight alone will not suit that well because people could associate it with lacking proper self-discipline (lol).
What the Republican party needs, to even consider winning in 2016, is a moderate Republican who leans more liberal on social issues but leans conservative on economic issues.
A Hillary Clinton/Elizabeth Warren combo could be deadly.
Bill Richardson is another qualified candidate for the Democratic Party.
On the Republican side, we could see Sarah Palin going after the nomination.
Chris Christie has an appeal problem. His weight alone will not suit that well because people could associate it with lacking proper self-discipline (lol).
What the Republican party needs, to even consider winning in 2016, is a moderate Republican who leans more liberal on social issues but leans conservative on economic issues.
Kantor said:
A little bit. But the big difference is in facial expression. He doesn't look fat and jovial. He looks fat and miserable. |
so... a normal fat person is happy and aristocrat fat people are miserable? Personally, I would think it would be the other way around.
| gergroy said: not really, Romney was still 2nd in the popular vote and he dropped out like a month before Huckabee. Romney also took more states. The only reason Huckabee had six more delegates is he stayed in it longer than romney. |
vgc ate my giant post :( Oh well. I'll try to recreate it, well some of it.
By the time Huckabee started gaining momentum Romney was on his way out. After his loss on Super Tuesday Romney's steam was gone. I doubt he'd have won anymore states even if he stayed in. :P
Wooh, one line!
| dany612 said: A Hillary Clinton/Elizabeth Warren combo could be deadly. Bill Richardson is another qualified candidate for the Democratic Party. |
That's a horrible choice for a running mate. We don't even know if she will win her election this year. They need people with more experience, not a newbie who won't even be finished with her first term
TadpoleJackson said:
By the time Huckabee started gaining momentum Romney was on his way out. After his loss on Super Tuesday Romney's steam was gone. I doubt he'd have won anymore states even if he stayed in. :P Wooh, one line!
That's a horrible choice for a running mate. We don't even know if she will win her election this year. They need people with more experience, not a newbie who won't even be finished with her first term |
*cough* Obama *cough*
gergroy said:
|
^ haha good one.
| gergroy said:
|
Haha, but he was endorsed by Oprah! :P
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
