By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - What innovation do you hope to see more of next gen?

Dr.Grass said:
Irrespective of whether it is a good business model to follow in the current climate or not, I would be very happy if Sony just sticks with delivering a bleeding-edge piece of tech with a ton of unique games.

Just don't be as *retarded* again and overlook something as fundamental as RAM. If they put in a 1GB ram then we would've seen a lot more from PS3.

Also, not putting an over-complicated, stupidly powerful leading to severely bottlenecked CPU that costs billions upon billions to develop and manufacture would help.

It just seems so easy now, doesn't it?

Put in practically the same CPU that was in the 360, double the RAM and you've got a more capable system that's cheaper than the one you had with the CELL. Imagine that happened...



Around the Network

Smoother frame rate, less pop-in, more colorful games, better checkpoints, or smarter built in systems to bring you back in the game, faster loadtimes for when you die.



Andrespetmonkey said:
Dr.Grass said:
Irrespective of whether it is a good business model to follow in the current climate or not, I would be very happy if Sony just sticks with delivering a bleeding-edge piece of tech with a ton of unique games.

Just don't be as *retarded* again and overlook something as fundamental as RAM. If they put in a 1GB ram then we would've seen a lot more from PS3.

Also, not putting an over-complicated, stupidly powerful leading to severely bottlenecked CPU that costs billions upon billions to develop and manufacture would help.

It just seems so easy now, doesn't it?

Put in practically the same CPU that was in the 360, double the RAM and you've got a more capable system that's cheaper than the one you had with the CELL. Imagine that happened...


So you're also brave enough to admit that you just want a stupidly powerful next gen showcase?



Utilization of mobile platforms.

I want my game console to be my full media/web/smart hub (hopefully Android based).

Also, have you seen Google's new Nexus Q? Fucking bad ass and it would be great if consoles did this as well.



I never noticed it until about a month ago but loading times. I never really play pc games and after playing mass effect 2 and 3 on ps3 I played mass effect 1 on pc and the loading on the normandy etc was instant, now when I go back to the ps3 on all games it bugs me.



Around the Network

Physics, A.I. and animation.



bouzane said:
New innovative ideas for "core" games and less gimmicky garbage please.


And to add to my post, games of all types for gamers of all types and not just self-entitled core/hardcore gamers.



Dr.Grass said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
Dr.Grass said:
Irrespective of whether it is a good business model to follow in the current climate or not, I would be very happy if Sony just sticks with delivering a bleeding-edge piece of tech with a ton of unique games.

Just don't be as *retarded* again and overlook something as fundamental as RAM. If they put in a 1GB ram then we would've seen a lot more from PS3.

Also, not putting an over-complicated, stupidly powerful leading to severely bottlenecked CPU that costs billions upon billions to develop and manufacture would help.

It just seems so easy now, doesn't it?

Put in practically the same CPU that was in the 360, double the RAM and you've got a more capable system that's cheaper than the one you had with the CELL. Imagine that happened...


So you're also brave enough to admit that you just want a stupidly powerful next gen showcase?

Yes, just do it... responsibly? like 360 did this gen. Practically as capable as PS3, and what, $100 cheaper at launch?



I want better physics in games. I want games to be as close to real life as possible when interacting with objects.



more buttons, better grapix and sex!




    R.I.P Mr Iwata :'(