By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Community terms that must be used correctly or removed entirely next gen

Mr Khan said:
The casual/hardcore dichotomy should go down the tubes, given what Microsoft seems to be planning, with MS on board it will potentially isolate the Sony fandom (as there are equal signs that Sony is trying to stay the course), and change the terms from a dichotomy to something hopefully more complex.

Sony is trying to stay the course with what exactly?



Around the Network
o_O.Q said:
Mr Khan said:
The casual/hardcore dichotomy should go down the tubes, given what Microsoft seems to be planning, with MS on board it will potentially isolate the Sony fandom (as there are equal signs that Sony is trying to stay the course), and change the terms from a dichotomy to something hopefully more complex.

Sony is trying to stay the course with what exactly?

The PS3 design philosophy and general strategic mentality. The Vita shows that they're still thinking that way, though Vita was certainly launched smarter than the PS3



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Mr Khan said:
o_O.Q said:
Mr Khan said:
The casual/hardcore dichotomy should go down the tubes, given what Microsoft seems to be planning, with MS on board it will potentially isolate the Sony fandom (as there are equal signs that Sony is trying to stay the course), and change the terms from a dichotomy to something hopefully more complex.

Sony is trying to stay the course with what exactly?

The PS3 design philosophy and general strategic mentality. The Vita shows that they're still thinking that way, though Vita was certainly launched smarter than the PS3


i thought the casual/hardcore thing was more connected to software than hardware?



o_O.Q said:
Mr Khan said:
o_O.Q said:
Mr Khan said:
The casual/hardcore dichotomy should go down the tubes, given what Microsoft seems to be planning, with MS on board it will potentially isolate the Sony fandom (as there are equal signs that Sony is trying to stay the course), and change the terms from a dichotomy to something hopefully more complex.

Sony is trying to stay the course with what exactly?

The PS3 design philosophy and general strategic mentality. The Vita shows that they're still thinking that way, though Vita was certainly launched smarter than the PS3


i thought the casual/hardcore thing was more connected to software than hardware?

Sort of. It's about the strategy you pursue with the hardware you offer, as i don't doubt Microsoft's nextbox will be roughly as strong as Sony's machine, but Microsoft is going to put Kinect 2.0 out there face-forward, whereas Sony is going to pitch Orbis in a similar manner as they have with Vita, or so i believe. The point i was trying to make is that with Microsoft being less "Xbox360-ish" it's not going to devolve into a simple "us versus them, hardcore versus casual" mentality, because Microsoft largely will keep things more complex. Nintendo too, to a lesser extent, as i'm sure they're going to make more extensive efforts to make sure they at least stay in the multiplat loop going forward.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Mr Khan said:
o_O.Q said:
Mr Khan said:
o_O.Q said:
Mr Khan said:
The casual/hardcore dichotomy should go down the tubes, given what Microsoft seems to be planning, with MS on board it will potentially isolate the Sony fandom (as there are equal signs that Sony is trying to stay the course), and change the terms from a dichotomy to something hopefully more complex.

Sony is trying to stay the course with what exactly?

The PS3 design philosophy and general strategic mentality. The Vita shows that they're still thinking that way, though Vita was certainly launched smarter than the PS3


i thought the casual/hardcore thing was more connected to software than hardware?

Sort of. It's about the strategy you pursue with the hardware you offer, as i don't doubt Microsoft's nextbox will be roughly as strong as Sony's machine, but Microsoft is going to put Kinect 2.0 out there face-forward, whereas Sony is going to pitch Orbis in a similar manner as they have with Vita, or so i believe. The point i was trying to make is that with Microsoft being less "Xbox360-ish" it's not going to devolve into a simple "us versus them, hardcore versus casual" mentality, because Microsoft largely will keep things more complex. Nintendo too, to a lesser extent, as i'm sure they're going to make more extensive efforts to make sure they at least stay in the multiplat loop going forward.


well we'll see, although i think its a little too early to make statements like that



Around the Network

Most of these terms only came around when Nintendo turned their company around and was successful with the Wii. No one was saying these things last gen when Sony had the weakest console and released their eye "toy". Lets be real here there are definately double standards in this so called fanboy console war. I believe people should be able to say what they want its all entertainment at the end of the day anyway.



Can someone give a short version of the OP?



Nice list. The only problem I have is with the Casual/Hardcore section.

I agree that any game can be played casually or hardcore, but we have different viewpoints on casual and hardcore games. I think it is possible to have casual and hardcore games. I think casual and hardcore define the way the game is played, and the type of gamers that most often play them. I would say a hardcore game is typically much more violent than a casual game. I would say Super Mario Galaxy is a casual game. While it can be played in a hardcore manner, most of the people that play it do so casually. That's why I call it a casual game.

I would say that games that are hardcore try to attract a more mature audience, which goes along with why the games are more violent. I would say hardcore games generally are more complex in nature, requiring more strategic gameplay, planning ahead, or maybe more emotional influence. I would say these things in general describe a hardcore game.



 Been away for a bit, but sneaking back in.

Gaming on: PS4, PC, 3DS. Got a Switch! Mainly to play Smash

Aielyn said:

First point on this is that "casual" does not describe a game. There is no such thing as a "casual game". A game may be played casually, it may be particularly suited to casual play. But any game may be played casually, and any game may be played in a "hardcore" manner. Wii Sports is not a "casual game". Just Dance is only as "casual" as Call of Duty. "Casual" is a description of an attitude with which a person plays a game. Which leads to the second point...

"Casual" does not describe a gamer. People who occasionally play games are not "casual gamers", any more than a person who likes to watch the occasional sporting match is a "casual sports fan". The term "gamer" is one that applies to people who are "fans" of gaming. This includes people who are fans of Farmville just as much as it includes people who are fans of Mass Effect. If you must use a term to describe people who play games occasionally, own just one console, and don't care about major upcoming titles, then the term is "mainstream".


This part I quoted sounds so totally f****ing familiar.

You even use  Call of Duty , Wii Sports and Just Dance lololol

I did the exact same thing!



What people dont understand is that Angry Birds a so called Casual games is nothing else  than the HARDCORE GAMES of the late 80s and early 90s were.

Angry birds is even a little bit more complex than some of those games.  And just because it has NO competitive multiplayer people call it casual  FAIIIL!!!

They also argued that Call of Duty is a hardcore game but just dance is NOT. And when I asked them WHY? BOTH GAMES CAN BE PLAYED EXTENSIVLY AGAINST OTHER PEOPLE SO THEY HAVE COMPETITIVE MODES. They were silent.

You can play EVERY game competitively you could write down your scores or try to reach a higher level or be faster in completing it.
HELL there was the 89 movie The Wizard where Savage played SMB3 against other people  all having seperate NES systems.  YOU CAN MAKE EVERYTHING competive if you want. So EVEERYTTHING IS HARDCORE and MAKES the term HARDCORE USELESS.

There is no CASUAL GAMES or HARDCORE GAMES. The only difference there is is:  ACCESSIBLE GAMES AND NON ACCESSIBLE GAMES.  Some take more time to be played like complex roleplaying games where you have to chose a race class  god haircolor whatever. And then there is stuff like  Mario bros or Tetris etc.

I for myself dont play phone games because they mostly have no story and most of them are not really complex. PLUS I will never pay for any kind of DIGITAL content. Im all for PHYSICAL. But sometimes I play a few free games i have on my phone like Breakout / Alleyway  clones-


So called hardcore gamers cant give anyone a real definiton what hardcore games are. Just let 10 hardcore gamers sit down at a table and let them come up with a definition   and dont give them something to drink before they are done   you will see them die of thirst lol