There's no blame, if it's that important to someone, then that someone shouldn't buy it or he should choose Vita.

But useless complaining is useless. It's not coming, no matter how much people complain, swear, stop eating, cut yourself. It's not. So instead of complaining, people should either adapt or move on to another system.

It couldn't anyway the touch screen on WiiU is bigger and even more important is 16:9, while the DS touch screen is 4:3

edit: I forgot it has also clickable analog sticks and 2nd shoulder buttons.

then you missed the reason why I even started arguing with milkyjoe. There definitely is blame or rather asking them not to complain. They reasons for complaints are just as valid as anyone elses. They see value in having such an option for games. Thanks to the the ugly cpro, many were speculating/hoping for a 2nd nub in the future iterations of the hardware. They will be obviously feel disappointed.

and also this means that they will either release another Cpro for XL, or abandon future future support for Cpro for 3ds, or support it while not releasing a new one for the XL and alienate some audiences. It really is not a situation that is ideal to anyone

You've gone off the deep end here. Where did I say anything about games like Dark Souls? Dark Souls and others like it are able to find an audience (albeit a niche one) because they're following countless other RPG games on home consoles. I'm not saying games with low sales are worthless, I'm saying there are genres that have never been greatly required on handhelds for handhelds to thrive, and as such their absence isn't going to determine the success or failure of a platform like the 3DS.

The original statement was about a grand total of three games in genres that have had a few moderately successful appearances on handhelds (but nowhere close to the success they've seen on home consoles), and specifically one game from a series that has never appeared on a handheld before.  That's where the Mario on Vita analogy comes in, as you're never going to see it on Vita or any other non-Nintendo platform. Battlefield has proven to be just as likely to be found on any handheld as Mario has to be found anywhere else. So why complain that Battlefield isn't going to work on 3DS when there's nothing to suggest it would be released on the thing even with the perfect control options? Vita has the dual analog option, is there a Battlefield in the works? Nope, or at least, none that we know of, and given the history of the series, it's probable it will stay that way.

That's all I'm saying. I just don't think it's particularly unreasonable to question why it's important that a handheld isn't going to get a game from a series that's never been on a handheld before.

The thing is having more control options is better but they should have put it from the beginning, if the newer version of the console is more capable than the older version, early adopters wold be cheated. This means no game could really utilize the second analog in a very useful manner (like FPS games), at most it could be used to move camera. I haven't played Monster Hunter on 3DS, but on RE:Revelation the second analog is useless.

facepalm, the whole point just flew over your head there

Fact of the matter is there WILL be those who want games like COD, Battlefield, Crisis Core etc on the system. Such games will not work very well without a second nub. People like to have such an option and it's apparent devs do too. You say you aren't but you are focusing on sales here. My point is that stop focusing on sales. There will always be games that are much more suitable for dual nubs/sticks on a handheld. We have seen COD and medal of honor like games on handhelds you know. The psp ones were actually pretty decent too. With a second stick on the psp they would have been even better. This is why so many vita games have worked like a dream thanks to the second stick. This is also why I am more optimisitc about AC Liberations because the second stick is very important to such a game.

That definitely is not all you're saying. The initial post from you said something along the lines of, I hope such things stay away from my handheld and that's not what you want from it. Which is a very narrow minded pov. It's not only about you nor is it only about the most successful franchises in the history of the handheld. It's only about the simple fact that having more options for gameplay is good for gamers and devs alike. This is a fact. So stop running around that. People have every right to say where the fuck is my second nub lol or something like that

And who is the winner mister? the guy that always see the bad about Nintendo sytems? thats the winner for you?

not a big deal
i own Revelations and MGS3D, the first one is perfectly playeble without the CCP, with MGS3D is much more necessary to enjoy it, but its ONE game...being optional is the best choice imo

Been saying the same exact thing about the WIi adn the myraid of 3rd party games that never came, but people still complain to this day, nothing you can do

got a link?? and even if it were true. There was still interest in the game. What people picked it up just cause it was 20 bucks??? If people arent interested there not interested, no matter the price