I totally agree with this post!

I may as well compile a small list of suspicions.

Spurge still makes me slightly uneasy, though admittedly there's little to back this up.

Korppi's absence is worrying.

FF's vote of supermario128 is still a little suspicious to me.

Smeags' last two comments have been unrelated to Mafia, so he's been in the thread, but not really contributing.

Noctis appears to find everything hilarious for no apparent reason. Not really a scum tell, but...odd.

Ive been thinking the same thing! But I dont really know yet how the houses will play in into this. As far as I know (this is only based on my name and role) I dont see an obvious connection between my name and role. Id say that there would have been far better characters to this role. So there might not be an apperant connection between name and role.

But it would be interesting to see if if theres a connection between houses and alignments...

Im off to bed now gents and ladies. See ya tomorrow!

I know you wanted me to just give you my thoughts on mantle defending but I also took the liberty of looking at both Mantle and Kantor defending you since you can't distinguish the the two cases.

This is what happened. I was expressing how lovely it would be to lynch Pezus or Radish for falling into Rol's trap. Kantor comes along and lists you with the people who fell for the trap as well. After getting the link of your slip up, and before I even respond to it, Kantor defends your mistake for reasons YOU listed in the your post itself. Now personally, I don't find that type of defending suspicious because 1) Kantor was the one who mentioned you fell into the trap when I was completely oblivious to that fact. I don't understand why he would even bring it up if his intention wasn't to grill you for it.I don't get a scum vibe at all from it. and 2)he didn't go out of his way to defend (no acting) he just restated that you were on the phone and deprived of sleep.Honestly, you should be more suspicious of me for ignoring your gay parade 3 hour of sleep phone posting excuse. 

Ok Mantle. This was... pretty early in the game when he defended you. It actually took me a while to find it because I didn't think it was in the first  couple dozen posts of the game. Overlooked by me because I was focusing on Spurge's "I don't wanna derp read my PM" post. Anyways, here: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4621953

and my opinion about it  (thanks to recent discoveries) is that he had completely no idea what the term "revenge vote" meant in the game of mafia. That said, his reason to FoS mario was a reasonable one. Lets not forget mario FoS' the two people arguing : me and Spurge. How does that work anyway? Usually two people arguing implies one of them is town and the other is scum, or they are both townys bickering. What 2 dumb scum would argue in the beginning of the game? I hate that. Mario also FoS 2 people last who were arguing. That fucking blows my mind... he was scum last game he did that.

Anyways.Sidetracked. Now, the part the puts mantle in how water was his assumption that you were town and likely have a strong role, which makes no sense. Why would one assume so much 30 posts in the game? It felt forced. Other players did the exact same kind of vote, why he singled you out is puzzling.

A light bulb just went out in my head... prof, I swear to god if this was some scheme for me to come the realization that you and Mantle are siblings as a sick trolling joke because of my bad luck with sibling roles, I'm going to march in that gay parade using you as my fabulous new pair of boots!

Bingo. It's sniffing for townie points imho, I don't like it. Also, discussion that distracts from lynching scum is worse than silence, I find. @hatmoza. I am. @Rol. I already told town my stance on SM128's request (repeated by Insomniac). I don't reply to traps against townsfolk. But since there is ill will among us... I am town.

I'm not the same - I genuinely read every post carefully, looking for opportunities to ask questions and generally be a nuisance, but I couldn't find much - as you can see, I did make some comments about things. I'll continue to do this tomorrow, and hopefully as the game gets a bit more heated up then there will be more things to talk about, rather than at the moment which is just a mash-up of claims, comments about last round and other things which I can't think of anything to question on. HOWEVER, this Prof vs Hatmosa thing looks really interesting, and I'll insert opinions etc. about that when I get the chance to read it (just saw Hatmosa's most recent post, and it looks like a big one - I'll look at it tomorrow); don't see the repetition of the word "tomorrow" as me trying to delay any activity -I'm back to school tomorrow, and I don't want to be tired :(

Hatmoza, I don't like how you would assume that scum wouldn't bicker in-thread. That's awefully shady of you considering scum have as prime intent to blend with town during daytime. If you're trying to mislead town, that was a nice shot. Otherwise, smart scum would rather argue to appear non-affiliated.

Can't you read? hatmoza said " I do give you credit for adding the "probably" to avoid generalizing" and then you go on to say "I like how you completely ignore the word "probably". lol". He didn't ignore it at all, also "probably scum" implies "a good chance of being scum" so yes you did say you consider people who didn't answer your question to be scum.

I've got under 300 posts on this website, and a post/day count of 1.3. Even when I am logged in on this site, I'm never exactly... exuberant to partake in most conversations. Which is admittedly a shit characteristic to possess in a Mafia game because it makes you look scummy and doesn't help the Town at all, but it's no worse than forcing it out when you don't have anything to add and ending up sounding like scum, I suppose.

But anyway, I'm still quite new to online Mafia (as you can no doubt tell), and it's still day 1. Give it time.