What do you think of Danne and Kantor so far this game? They have done quite a bit of flavour analysis in the game.

Yes, I understand that we might have 4 that COULD kill. However there were only 3 kills, so why did you jump to conclusions with the "4 kills theory" is what I'm getting at. It could be any combination of: mafia, vigilante, or serial killer and there could be more than one mafia faction or more than one serial killer, but we don't know.

I'm glad you have moved on. You constantly say you want to focus on me, but Hatz is the only one who actually is.

Unvote

Vote: Happy

I'll return the favor. Now put the pressure on me!

How do you get "Ned" when I claimed "Eddard"?

Look at my previous posts.

I already have. I've place a pressure vote on you, and explained that you are playing very differently from usual.

You are also much too confident and are fingerpointing people for small mistakes. That's something scum would do because they need to hold onto certainties rather than hypotheses in general. Town is the opposite, all they have is hypothesis.

You have only played one other game with me, so concluding I am playing differently because of that is a little premature. Besides, I already stated I play differently based on the type of role I have.

I am not confident about my theories at all. I am just giving my honest opinions on everyone. It is not that I am only going after people for small mistakes, but my general feeling about them as well. Their posting style, changed over other games, and so on. Yes, all I have is hypothesis which is why I apologized to Hatz if he really is town, but I can't see him being pro town from the way he played so far.

I just love the setting, and I can never turn down any opportunity to discuss it. I apologise if I'm derailing the discussion somewhat, but all of you need to go read those books (or if you absolutely detest books, at least watch the show).

Never mind, I looked up my character again and he is called by different names in the series. Sorry.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4631961

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4632011

The only thing that has changed is that I am now more suspicious of Happy, less suspicious of Danne, and I think Rol could be pro town. I still have no clue about Noctis and Koorpi. Also, I could be dead wrong about Mantle as well.

I have watched many other games of yours, and I can tell you your play style is night and day. Funny thing, I'm not the only one to have noticed. It struck me on your first post.

Hatz played skeptically, and rightly so. I can't go into that again, but if mafiascum's wiki is any indicator, the fakeclaim was a mafia move. (I've already said as much).

I was going to comment on it when you posted, but only to say that I completely agreed with your analysis on how the night kills turned out - I was scrolling through the posts when the day started looking to see if someone else had posted that (your post) before I posted my own ideas, but you beat me to it.

I am quite curious how Wonk and Smeags both turned out vanilla though- I assumed that this was a power game