MasterVG71782 said:
greenmedic88 said:
Alright, so here's a question for you: would you rather pay $399 for a Wii U with a 320 or maybe even 250GB HDD, or $299 and the option to use any HDD, inducing any HDD you may already own?
For $100, I'd probably take a 1TB HDD minimum, and likely never have to think about upgrading for the life cycle of the console.
|
Well, we don't know at what price the Wii U will debut, so it could very well come out at $399 with the bare minimum. I'm thinking that most of the costs for the Wii U will most likely come from the GamePad, although there's not enough information really to go off of yet to determine that.
While providing your own means of storage is cheaper, there's no word on exactly if we'll be able to use any old HDD. Nintendo could use a Microsoft and use proprietary drives, which means they could charge whatever they want for extra storage.
|
The GamePad is not a tablet PC; it's a controller with video/data streaming capabilities. There are a lot of missing components that contribute to the overall cost of tablet PCs from SoC, system memory, local storage, etc. etc. that simply are not in the GamePad.
As I alway say, I'll wait until iSuppli does its teardown and BoM assessment upon the Wii U's release, but my guess is that the controller will cost less than $100 to produce and assemble. Possibly as low as $60.
If Nintendo goes the MS route of proprietary formatted/packaged, Xbox branded HDDs, then I think there will be legitimate reason for consumers to complain. While it would be a good idea for them to have Nintendo Wii U brand HDDs available for lesser informed consumers, or even just consumers who want matching external HDDs that go with the Wii U design (nothing wrong with that at all) that can easily be picked up at the same retail outlet where the consoles are sold, the option to use an existing HDD is one that I would imagine most buyers would opt for.